Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 8:30 am



Reply to topic  [ 1270 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 51  Next
 The Contenders II 
Author Message
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Vareity on Letters From Iwo Jima and Jeffrey Wells' piece.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:43 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
Gunslinger wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
yoshue wrote:
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.


Yup, just as expected. :shades:


It's just one man's opinion. ;) The critic at FOX News gave it a positive review.


Oooooh, Fox News. I can't wait until you mention when Larry King calls it "The best film about the CIA ever made!"


And I can't wait until you act as if the opinion of a fairly insignificant award season blogger with delusions of grandeur is enough to bury a major motion picture. Wait, you already did. ;)

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:54 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Gunslinger wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Gunslinger wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
yoshue wrote:
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.


Yup, just as expected. :shades:


It's just one man's opinion. ;) The critic at FOX News gave it a positive review.


Oooooh, Fox News. I can't wait until you mention when Larry King calls it "The best film about the CIA ever made!"


And I can't wait until you act as if the opinion of a fairly insignificant award season blogger with delusions of grandeur is enough to bury a major motion picture. Wait, you already did. ;)


There were PLENTY of reasons to bury The Good Sheperd long before we heard Tapley's opinion. He just confirmed everything that could have possibly gone wrong from the trailer.


Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:00 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Shitty start for Pursuit - 40% http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/pursuit_of_happyness/

Rotten from both Variety and HR.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:53 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Happyness, except for Will Smith, is out of the major categories, I'm thinking.


Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:36 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
Happyness, except for Will Smith, is out of the major categories, I'm thinking.


Agreed, and it'll need to see a big upturn in reviews for him to win.


Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:37 am
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
This may just be me being stupid... but doesn't the fact that Iwo Jima's almost entirely in Japanese make it more a foreign language picture nominee than BP?


Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:58 am
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
Academy rules for Foreign Language Film make only Foreign-made films eligible.

So a foreign language film like Letters or Apocalypto, made in the U.S., are not eligible.

Or so I understand.

_________________
k


Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:55 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Awards Czar Jon wrote:
dolcevita wrote:

No I Didn't. You're only as memorable as your last film. Iwo Jima is going to open small and drop theatres just as quick as Flags. People are just not even going to bother showing up. Its going to have zero momentum. Zero.


Please, you think WB is going to release it wide? They're planning a limited release to build momentum...


Hmmm. I didn't think of that. Guess I always assumed its Eastwood, and would open wide (north of 800 theatres).


Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:13 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Kris Tapley on Letters.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
That is very high praise to say the least.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:03 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Shitty start for Pursuit - 40% http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/pursuit_of_happyness/

Rotten from both Variety and HR.


As I expected.

I was baffled to see why people thought it was a Picture contender. The Oscars may historically love sap, but it has to be proven sap, which this isn't.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:33 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
That is very high praise to say the least.


Agreed. It reads more like a four star review than a three and a half.

I don't mind if Iwo Jima gets nominated, I just really fucking hope it doesn't win. I can only assume Eastwood has some bizarre vendetta against Scorsese.


Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Especially given that he gave a film like Flags which he didnt particually think was great, 3 stars.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:32 pm
Profile
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Sun Ra wrote:
Killuminati510 wrote:
Shitty start for Pursuit - 40% http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/pursuit_of_happyness/

Rotten from both Variety and HR.


As I expected.

I was baffled to see why people thought it was a Picture contender. The Oscars may historically love sap, but it has to be proven sap, which this isn't.


Sort of reminds me of I Am Sam's reception where people were expecting it to be a contender


Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:10 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Some NSFC links for upcoming movies:

Children of Men
Curse of the Golden Flower
Dreamgirls
The Good German
The Good Shepherd
Letters From Iwo Jima
Notes on a Scandal
Pan's Labyrinth
Perfume: The Story of a Murderer
Rocky Balboa
Venus

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Profile WWW
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Especially given that he gave a film like Flags which he didnt particually think was great, 3 stars.


Actually I think Tapley is psychologically incapable of ever giving an Eastwood movie a higher/equal rating to that of a Scorsese film. I found his praise for Letters genuinely surprising considering his usual condescending, ignorant & pompous attitude towards Eastwood. Could it be even Tapley's growing up a bit?


Last edited by the limey on Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:25 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
the limey wrote:
Killuminati510 wrote:
Especially given that he gave a film like Flags which he didnt particually think was great, 3 stars.


Actually I think Tapley is psychologically incapable of ever giving an Eastwood movie a higher/equal rating to that of a Scorsese film. I found his praise for Letters I genuinely surprising considering his usual condescending, ignorant & pompous attitude towards Eastwood. Could it be even Tapley's growing up a bit?


I think that at least partially balances out those who are incapable of giving an Eastwood movie a bad grade. Kirk Honeycutt from THR shows that quite clearly in his Letters review, where in his last paragraph he admitted the film is slow, but then immediately said "may be part of Eastwood's strategy", showing more willingness to give him the benefit of the doubt than he probably would have to a lesser director.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:37 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Well Tapley is very much behind Letters with the way he's been campaigning for it the past week.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:54 pm
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
xiayun wrote:
I think that at least partially balances out those who are incapable of giving an Eastwood movie a bad grade.


Then I await your list of critics who gave good reviews to the likes of Firefox & The Rookie with interest ... oh, wait a minute ...


Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:54 pm
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
the limey wrote:
xiayun wrote:
I think that at least partially balances out those who are incapable of giving an Eastwood movie a bad grade.


Then I await your list of critics who gave good reviews to the likes of Firefox & The Rookie with interest ... oh, wait a minute ...


Eastwood didn't make The Rookie which had some great reviews. And Firefox deserved all the hate it got. But more importantly, Clint Eastwood wasn't always considered this incredible director, that's a more recent development.


Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:23 pm
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
the limey wrote:
xiayun wrote:
I think that at least partially balances out those who are incapable of giving an Eastwood movie a bad grade.


Then I await your list of critics who gave good reviews to the likes of Firefox & The Rookie with interest ... oh, wait a minute ...


MovieDude wrote:
Eastwood didn't make The Rookie which had some great reviews.


You must be thinking of some other movie! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100514/

MovieDude wrote:
And Firefox deserved all the hate it got. But more importantly, Clint Eastwood wasn't always considered this incredible director, that's a more recent development.


Eastwood's directorial talent was evident from his first couple of movies - both Play Misty for Me & High Plains Drifter stand up extremely well, the latter especially so. The Outlaw Josey Wales made TIME magazine's 10 Best list, drew an incredible rave from Orson Welles & routinely ranks amongst his top films, yet that was made in '75. Eastwood's had a varied career - as has any director with as sizable body of work as his - but he's kept trying different things & in the process he's gotten better & better. But the talent was always there so to suggest that Eastwood suddenly became this great director post-Blood Work, as if all of his previous work counted for nothing, is downright ludicrous. Such a view no doubt offers small crumbs of comfort to those who'd presumably prefer damnation rather than have to admit that Eastwood was anything other than some actor pretending to be a director but for everybody else Eastwood as director was a major talent right from the start.


Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:01 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40240
Post 
The latest BOF Oscar article:

http://www.teenbachelorproductions.com/ ... pdate.html

Brian and I will be dual covering the awards this year. :)

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:21 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Well Pursuit should be gettng atleast one nod come Oscars.

Seal should be getting a best song nod for his song from Pursuit of Happyness "Father's Way" obviously will lose to one of the three Dreamgirls songs, unless theres a split.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:38 am
Profile
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5811
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Well Pursuit should be gettng atleast one nod come Oscars.

Seal should be getting a best song nod for his song from Pursuit of Happyness "Father's Way" obviously will lose to one of the three Dreamgirls songs, unless theres a split.


His song wasn't particularly memorable and the song competition is so fierce that year that I has a shot at getting in. Score is more likely (as well as Actor and Supporting Actress).


Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:18 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 1270 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 51  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.