Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 1:28 pm



Reply to topic  [ 1270 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 ... 51  Next
 The Contenders II 
Author Message
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
yoshue wrote:
Upon closer inspection of Tapley's updated predictions, it appears he now has Letter From Iwo Jima pegged for nine nominations. Must have left an impression.

I don't see how Flags/Letters vote splitting is not a problem though. Flags, as much as I didn't care for it, had passionate support. This whole Eastwood situation unsettles me.


No, he did a sweeping change toward Iwo Jima two weeks ago. He still hasn't seen it yet.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:13 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
After watching it today I can safely declare "Breaking & Entering" not to be a contender for any awards


Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:38 pm
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.

_________________
k


Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:06 pm
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
Well, that makes me feel better about only having Jolie in my predicts (Who I think I'm gonna drop for Thompson).


Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:20 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40244
Post 
Dreamgirls only has a 6.8 average so far... uh oh. Doesn't seem like the reviews are pointing it out to be that special, this is not Chicago.

...




:shout: :shout: :shout:

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:27 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
J-Bot Jiggler 5 wrote:
Dreamgirls only has a 6.8 average so far... uh oh. Doesn't seem like the reviews are pointing it out to be that special, this is not Chicago.

...




:shout: :shout: :shout:


Ummm

The movie doesn't come out until Christmas, so there's still plenty of time for more reviews to come in...


Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:31 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
yoshue wrote:
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.


Yup, just as expected. :shades:


Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:54 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Thats actually better then what I expected to hear, "killer third act."

I was sure the whole movie would be one big snooze but that has got me curious, might not be all that bad. Always better to end with a bang, then start with one.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:04 am
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
This was posted on Oscarwatch:

The Lives of Others, the German Foreign Language entry may in fact be one of 2006's very best offerings. If enough people see it, it could end up expanding beyond its foreign language category (it will most certainly be nominated) to perhaps screenplay (as Anne Thompson is predicting) and original score. If it were up to me, the actors would be nominated, especially Ulrich Mühe as the interrogator who grows a heart as a result of his surveillance of writer/actress couple. The Lives of Others tackles such weighty subject matter as freedom of speech, the primal need for human contact, creative inspiration, love, art - and, of course, the chokehold of fear when the truth threatens to bring down a misguided (shall we say) government.

The Lives of Others is a real threat to Volver for Foreign Language - it reminds me of when Amelie was up against No Man's Land. Volver is a wonderful film though it isn't Almodovar's best. It already beat Volver at the Euro Oscars and will likely be the champion at the 79th. Just a heads up, Oscarwatchers.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:04 am
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Thats actually better then what I expected to hear, "killer third act."

I was sure the whole movie would be one big snooze but that has got me curious, might not be all that bad. Always better to end with a bang, then start with one.


Yeah that part did get me curious, but enough to see it in theaters? Maybe if this was September, but I don't know how I'll get around to it with so much product out around then.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:11 am
Profile
The French Dutch Boy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 10266
Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
Post 
Levy wrote:
This was posted on Oscarwatch:

The Lives of Others, the German Foreign Language entry may in fact be one of 2006's very best offerings. If enough people see it, it could end up expanding beyond its foreign language category (it will most certainly be nominated) to perhaps screenplay (as Anne Thompson is predicting) and original score. If it were up to me, the actors would be nominated, especially Ulrich Mühe as the interrogator who grows a heart as a result of his surveillance of writer/actress couple. The Lives of Others tackles such weighty subject matter as freedom of speech, the primal need for human contact, creative inspiration, love, art - and, of course, the chokehold of fear when the truth threatens to bring down a misguided (shall we say) government.

The Lives of Others is a real threat to Volver for Foreign Language - it reminds me of when Amelie was up against No Man's Land. Volver is a wonderful film though it isn't Almodovar's best. It already beat Volver at the Euro Oscars and will likely be the champion at the 79th. Just a heads up, Oscarwatchers.


It feels like every German film I've seen or heard about ends up being really good. I like the Germans.

Peace,
Mike.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:47 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11028
Post 
Amelie was robbed.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:05 pm
Profile WWW
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
Image


Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:10 pm
Profile WWW
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5812
Post 
Excellent poster. I wonder whose idea it was to purposely not have Clint Eastwood's name on there.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:49 pm
Profile WWW
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
alex young wrote:
Excellent poster. I wonder whose idea it was to purposely not have Clint Eastwood's name on there.


You mean right where it says 'Letters from Iwo Jima - A Clint Eastwood Film'? :lol:


Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:20 pm
Profile WWW
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5812
Post 
the limey wrote:
alex young wrote:
Excellent poster. I wonder whose idea it was to purposely not have Clint Eastwood's name on there.


You mean right where it says 'Letters from Iwo Jima - A Clint Eastwood Film'? :lol:


haha i missed that, i guess i just saw the "from the director of " on the top


Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:27 pm
Profile WWW
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
Kris Tapley is now predicting Iwo Jima as the Best Picture upsetter at the Oscars. Methinks he's just trying to kick up dust and make it seem like this is the BIG JANUARY SURPRISE. The problem is, no one knows what the BIG JANUARY SURPRISE is until, well, JANUARY.

And Lives of Others might be a smart prediction for Screenplay. The branch loves foreign films.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:02 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Iwo Jima isn't even getting nominated, more or less winning. Gosling on the other hand, is really a dark horse for a nom at least, which is news to me.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11028
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
Iwo Jima isn't even getting nominated, more or less winning.


You spoke to soon..


Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:42 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
neo_wolf wrote:
dolcevita wrote:
Iwo Jima isn't even getting nominated, more or less winning.


You spoke to soon..


No I Didn't. You're only as memorable as your last film. Iwo Jima is going to open small and drop theatres just as quick as Flags. People are just not even going to bother showing up. Its going to have zero momentum. Zero.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
dolcevita wrote:
Iwo Jima isn't even getting nominated, more or less winning.


You spoke to soon..


No I Didn't. You're only as memorable as your last film. Iwo Jima is going to open small and drop theatres just as quick as Flags. People are just not even going to bother showing up. Its going to have zero momentum. Zero.


Please, you think WB is going to release it wide? They're planning a limited release to build momentum.

But it ain't winning Picture, that's for sure. Th only BP winner to win the NBR was American Beauty, a major awards steamroller.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:57 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
yoshue wrote:
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.


Yup, just as expected. :shades:


It's just one man's opinion. ;) The critic at FOX News gave it a positive review.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:56 am
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Gunslinger wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
yoshue wrote:
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.


Yup, just as expected. :shades:


It's just one man's opinion. ;) The critic at FOX News gave it a positive review.


Oooooh, Fox News. I can't wait until you mention when Larry King calls it "The best film about the CIA ever made!"


Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:05 am
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
yoshue wrote:
Tapley weighs in on Good Shephard...for the most part:

Quote:
The two films everyone is waiting to hear about...

David Poland is hinting all over the place via blog entries and Gurus of Gold chart updates about his opinion on one film. The other one...well...I haven't been told I'm under embargo, but regardless, that doesn't mean I'm dying to write a full review and kill the film in question.

However, as a mover and shaker in this year's awards race, it's done for. Big ideas it has in spades, but at what feels like three hours long (I believe it's two hours forty minutes), the convolution tears at the seams of one's patience. A killer third act that seems to be another film entirely wasn't enough to save it. Drop it from your lists...

That's really all I care to say about it right now. And all of this doesn't mean the studio doesn't still have the best film of the year elsewhere in their stable to push for awards success (if they so choose).


As expected.


That "best film of the year elsewhere in their stable" he's talking about is undoubtedly Children of Men.

The Good Shepard sucking is the best news ever.


Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:20 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
The Lives of Others debuts on metacritic.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:14 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 1270 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 ... 51  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.