Author |
Message |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
It's not that the movie is getting bad reviews, it's that the movie is being panned as boring and talky. And it's 2.5 hours long, so I'm definitely willing to believe it. Boring and talky is definitely bad for a blockbuster.
It will still open HUGE, though.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 9:46 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
Jon Lyrik wrote: It's not that the movie is getting bad reviews, it's that the movie is being panned as boring and talky. And it's 2.5 hours long, so I'm definitely willing to believe it. Boring and talky is definitely bad for a blockbuster.
It will still open HUGE, though.
But you have to look at it like this as well. These peopel viewing the movie are not it's fans. Here is an example:
Watching the Hostel DVD, Joe Roth said that when they screened the film for the yeoman before it was released, and the reaction afterwards was tepid at best. Most people in the test screening said that it wasn't that great of a film and that it would not play well to an audience. Then Roth asked the same audience if they thought that a "horror" audience would enjoy it. The majoirty of that same audience said "YES". The point is that the right audience will enjoy it and clearly critics are not that audience. Every critic (6 of them now) that has seen the movie and read the book, all enjoyed it. That's my point. Why would I care what someonme thinks that really had no desire to see it in the first place? All I care about is my opinion and perhaps those that also enjoyedw the book. My level of anticipation for this film, while not on the level of say SITH, is about high as it has been for any other film.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 9:59 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
baumer72 wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: It's not that the movie is getting bad reviews, it's that the movie is being panned as boring and talky. And it's 2.5 hours long, so I'm definitely willing to believe it. Boring and talky is definitely bad for a blockbuster.
It will still open HUGE, though. But you have to look at it like this as well. These peopel viewing the movie are not it's fans. Here is an example:
Watching the Hostel DVD, Joe Roth said that when they screened the film for the yeoman before it was released, and the reaction afterwards was tepid at best. Most people in the test screening said that it wasn't that great of a film and that it would not play well to an audience. Then Roth asked the same audience if they thought that a "horror" audience would enjoy it. The majoirty of that same audience said "YES". The point is that the right audience will enjoy it and clearly critics are not that audience. Every critic (6 of them now) that has seen the movie and read the book, all enjoyed it. That's my point. Why would I care what someonme thinks that really had no desire to see it in the first place? All I care about is my opinion and perhaps those that also enjoyedw the book. My level of anticipation for this film, while not on the level of say SITH, is about high as it has been for any other film.
i'm not arguing against you but this is something to think about.
do you think the people behind da vinci thought the critics would like it? I think they did, else why would they open it at Cannes?
Or is that a norm?
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:03 am |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
I don't understand why people are getting so defensive and still actively wanting this film to succeed. Surely we should rise up when Hollywood throws its shit at us, not just sit back and eat it.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:05 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Snrub wrote: I don't understand why people are getting so defensive and still actively wanting this film to succeed. Surely we should rise up when Hollywood throws its shit at us, not just sit back and eat it.
with a fork and knife mind you
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:07 am |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
baumer72 wrote: These peopel viewing the movie are not it's fans.
Fans don't carry a movie's legs, either.
Of course, maybe the public will like it and it will edge out $300 million. Certainly it's possible, public reaction to the film itself hasn't happened yet. We'll see for sure this weekend. But I'm not too optimistic on how the average person will react if it's indeed a boring movie. But personally, I want it to make as much as possible to upset the Catholic Church and especially those nuts in India who want the movie banned and are willing to use violence in demonstrations because of it.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:18 am |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
Oh, and my predictions as of now:
90/250
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:20 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
I've been in contact with 2 of the movie reviewers who have panned the film over at RT. i remmeber talking to them before the film itself came out and they mentioned how they'd been dying to see the film. From what i could gather, they hadn't read the books but were very interested in the film.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:23 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
bABA... you are such a little girl!
Where is the brave bABA we used to know!!! Da Vinci will open to at least 75 mil, and it will get a multiplier of at least 2.8.
That's what? 210 mil gauranteed? That's a minimum
So, naysayers are stupid.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:40 am |
|
 |
critch
Speed Racer
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 10:36 am Posts: 124
|
Remember Hannibal? 75/175. This film is being well publicized as being boring, and once it exhausts it's fanbase, probably in it's opening week, it'll drop like a stone, especially with actual action movies being released in the weeks ahead.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:49 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
critch wrote: Remember Hannibal? 75/175. This film is being well publicized as being boring, and once it exhausts it's fanbase, probably in it's opening week, it'll drop like a stone, especially with actual action movies being released in the weeks ahead. Hmm... critch wrote: Anyone remember Hannibal? I remember Hannibal.
65/175.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Thu May 18, 2006 10:55 am |
|
 |
Kenspy
Into the fray
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:09 pm Posts: 1874
|
Taking into account tracking and the 2.5 hour run-time...
OW: $64 million
Total: $160m - $176m (2.5 - 2.75)
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:17 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Kenspy wrote: Taking into account tracking and the 2.5 hour run-time...
OW: $64 million Total: $160m - $176m (2.5 - 2.75)
an excellent prediction. one i whole heartedly support.
new poster of the day
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:25 pm |
|
 |
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
bABALINA wrote: Kenspy wrote: Taking into account tracking and the 2.5 hour run-time...
OW: $64 million Total: $160m - $176m (2.5 - 2.75) an excellent prediction. one i whole heartedly support. new poster of the day
Except that tracking has DVC at $80M+.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:33 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Rolling Thunder wrote: bABALINA wrote: Kenspy wrote: Taking into account tracking and the 2.5 hour run-time...
OW: $64 million Total: $160m - $176m (2.5 - 2.75) an excellent prediction. one i whole heartedly support. new poster of the day Except that tracking has DVC at $80M+.
and this time around, the tracking is wrong
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:46 pm |
|
 |
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
bABALINA wrote: Rolling Thunder wrote: bABALINA wrote: Kenspy wrote: Taking into account tracking and the 2.5 hour run-time...
OW: $64 million Total: $160m - $176m (2.5 - 2.75) an excellent prediction. one i whole heartedly support. new poster of the day Except that tracking has DVC at $80M+. and this time around, the tracking is wrong
I agree. This is probably a hard film to track. I'd say they are low by about a good $5-10M. 
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:48 pm |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
bABALINA wrote: and this time around, the tracking is wrong
But sellouts has shown it to have already sold out a few shows already, pretty rare for flicks aimed at adults. Even if it drops like the Village on sat, it will still make more than 65 million just by using the sold out show projections
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:49 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Rolling Thunder wrote: bABALINA wrote: Rolling Thunder wrote: bABALINA wrote: Kenspy wrote: Taking into account tracking and the 2.5 hour run-time...
OW: $64 million Total: $160m - $176m (2.5 - 2.75) an excellent prediction. one i whole heartedly support. new poster of the day Except that tracking has DVC at $80M+. and this time around, the tracking is wrong I agree. This is probably a hard film to track. I'd say they are low by about a good $5-10M. 
heh .... you know the 'low' is the new 'high'.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 12:50 pm |
|
 |
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
This weekend will be interesting. 
_________________
|
Thu May 18, 2006 1:52 pm |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I am asking myself whether those who predict an opening below $70 million even care to take a look at the obvious signs and numbers.
Which ones?
I don't think it's any different than Day After Tomorrow or Pearl Harbor or Passion of the Christ..
_________________ Best Actress 2008
|
Thu May 18, 2006 2:08 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
bABA, exactly who is saying that "midnight showings will be huge" when the film doesn't have midnight showings?
|
Thu May 18, 2006 3:48 pm |
|
 |
Bryan_smith
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm Posts: 2120
|
Rod wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: I am asking myself whether those who predict an opening below $70 million even care to take a look at the obvious signs and numbers. Which ones?  I don't think it's any different than Day After Tomorrow or Pearl Harbor or Passion of the Christ..
LOL, you just listed three movies that had completely different runs... Day after Tomorrow surprised then fell hard. Pearl Harbour disappointed in its opening, but had decent enough legs to cross 200 million. Passion od the Christ opened huge and then had amazing legs...
so, which one do you think Da Vinci will be?
_________________ spaces.msn.com/members/metropolis19
|
Thu May 18, 2006 4:04 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Zingaling wrote: bABA, exactly who is saying that "midnight showings will be huge" when the film doesn't have midnight showings?
no mood to trace back ... but its been mentioned .. on multiple occasions now. there are just too many threads to keep track of things ... but i do remember one of the comments where someone mentioned how da vinci's midnight show tracking is already tracking so well and another person who stated how da vinci is receiving more midnight screenings than some other films from yesteryears and shit.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 4:05 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Yeah, I remember who you're talking about. The person mentioned 2:00AM and 4:00AM showings and stuff. I don't know about all that, but there are no midnight shows for TDVC. If there were, it would drop on Saturday.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 4:11 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Zingaling wrote: Yeah, I remember who you're talking about. The person mentioned 2:00AM and 4:00AM showings and stuff. I don't know about all that, but there are no midnight shows for TDVC. If there were, it would drop on Saturday.
that was misterglass. but no .. that wasn't the one i was refering to.
|
Thu May 18, 2006 4:19 pm |
|
|