I'm not for Hillary of at all, but I can't stand watching the train wreck of her trying to attack Barack on the speech thing and the supporter who couldn't name a policy. When you're getting booed, you have to stop.

I'm also not sure that Hillary knew that the guy who couldn't answer the question about Obama's record (Kirk Watson) represents Austin.

It's over and Hillary knows it. That last answer and speech from her was as good as a concession/ defeat statement.

Hah. What did she say?

That was a great ending speech by Hillary.
It was almost like she copied one of Obama's speeches.

She actually copied one of John Edwards speeches :p She has been doing that a lot.

There do seem to be some indications that she will bow out gracefully if she doesn't win Texas and Ohio. Color me pleasantly surprised.

She mentioned the incident, how she thought it was funny that one of Obama's supporters couldn't note any of his accomplishments.

It's hard to debate Obama. I mean, anytime you want to question his lack of experience, or the number of times he's pressed the wrong button, or failed to vote yes or no, or shady business dealings, or lying about using drugs and his childhood to sale more books, or being creative with his speeches, he totally avoids it.

He's apparently unlike every politican before him, great and shite, whom have had to answer for their questionable behaviour.

Instead, Obama will say something like "I'm not here for the same old patty cake games, I'm here to take about the issues." What's great is that he'll then follow that up WITHOUT exactly talking about the issues. He'll give some inspirational speech and the masses fawn. Or he'll sneeze and they go "ahhhhhhhhhhh."

It really is a cult of personality. It's fun to look at.

Samewise. I actually found it admirable how she refrained from making certain attacks when opportunity allowed -- I could almost sense her holding back in fear of feeding punch lines to McCain. Very magnanimous; color me surprised as well.

That’s not the case at all. I signed an agreement not to campaign in Michigan and Florida. Now, the DNC made the determination that they would not seat the delegates, but I was not party to that. I think it’s important for the DNC to ask itself, Is this really in the best interest of our eventual nominee? We do not want to be disenfranchising Michigan and Florida. We have to try to carry both of those states. I’d love to carry Texas, but it’s usually not in the electoral calculation for the Democratic nominee. Florida and Michigan are. Therefore, the people of those two states disregarded adamantly the DNC’s decision that they would not seat the delegates. They came out and voted. If they had been influenced by the DNC, despite the fact that there was very little campaigning, if any, they would have stayed home. But they wanted their voices heard. More than 2 million people came out. I mean, it was record turnout for a primary. Florida, in particular, is sensitive to being disenfranchised because of what happened to them in the last elections. I have said that I would ask my delegates to vote to seat.

Just as loudly as Obama supporters talk crap about Hillary, I do the same about Obama. Regardless, I'm happy with either in the White House... just moreso Hillary.