Author |
Message |
Tuukka
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am Posts: 1830 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Thegun wrote: One final thing, I kind of always loved the Helicopter bit in the trailer thinking how cool it would be, but thinking about it, McClane is against a Helicopter in three of the four films, and the 2nd finale takes place on the wing of a plane. A running theme, much like the big rig chase in a Terminator film.
I don't remember right now, but was there an elevator scene in DH2? Because the three other movies in the series have an important action scene that happens in an elevator.
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:54 pm |
|
 |
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm Posts: 8202
|
Tuukka wrote: Thegun wrote: One final thing, I kind of always loved the Helicopter bit in the trailer thinking how cool it would be, but thinking about it, McClane is against a Helicopter in three of the four films, and the 2nd finale takes place on the wing of a plane. A running theme, much like the big rig chase in a Terminator film. I don't remember right now, but was there an elevator scene in DH2? Because the three other movies in the series have an important action scene that happens in an elevator.
nope there was no elevator scene in DH2. There was one in DH3 but it was meh.
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:41 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Um, so I was totally surprised by this. I didn't expect to enjoy it as much as I did, especially because of all the praise it has received. But it was great. The best Die Hard maybe.
B+
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:00 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Magnus wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: F+
Didn't work at all. I don't even know what the + is for, I guess Bruce???  it was virtually unwatchable. Im all for dumb action films but this one was way too dumb.
Leave him behind. He's to damaged to bring with us... 
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:12 pm |
|
 |
Tuukka
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am Posts: 1830 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: The whole bit about how it was so shocking Gabriel reversed both traffic flows in the tunnel...you're all a bunch a killers, what's so shocking about that? You just turned all the stoplights green for fucksake, car crashes don't tickle.
They were not killers. They were just non-violent computer geeks. A few scenes earlier they even ask Gabriel what all the guns are for. For them the tunnel scene was the moment where the line from a "computer game" to an intentional murder was crossed.
The guy operating the traffic didn't want to commit murder.
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:25 pm |
|
 |
Tuukka
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am Posts: 1830 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Tuukka wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: The whole bit about how it was so shocking Gabriel reversed both traffic flows in the tunnel...you're all a bunch a killers, what's so shocking about that? You just turned all the stoplights green for fucksake, car crashes don't tickle. They were not killers. They were just non-violent computer geeks. A few scenes earlier they even ask Gabriel what all the guns are for. For them the tunnel scene was the moment where the line from a "computer game" to an intentional murder was crossed. There was one guy that asked. I do believe Maggie had killed before. She didnt suddenly learned how to karate kick and shoot a gun.
Maggie wasn't shocked by that moment. Only the guy operating the traffic was hesitating, from what I can recall. Was that really the same guy who joined Gabriel in the end? I actually had a hard time separating the hackers from each other, so I don't remember.
It does sound kinda strange thought, that a very minor moment like that crippled the film for you. One of the henchmen - a non-violent hacker geek - hesitated to personally commit murder, and that is a major flaw? Some people don't like to get their hands personally dirty, he was probably one of those people.
Last edited by Tuukka on Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:44 pm |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Magnus wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: I'm done with sequels, no more please. I'm beggin' you Hollywood. The thing is if that if they stop sequels, they will just make more look-alikes. Which honestly are even worse than sequels most of the time. Honestly, if they called Live Free or Die Hard something else, removed all references to John, I would have still disliked it but maybe a D- instead of the F+. Was I the only one that totally knew it was a model of the Capitol building that was going to be blown up on the broadcast? It didnt even look real on screen, I would think government officals would have known the difference as well. Also, I hated the scene where John tosses the guy down the stairs, then shoots the gun off into the corner to give the impression to Gabriel that he killed him. John would NEVER do that. This is the same guy that killed a baddie, dressed him up like Santa, and wrote a funny joke and hung it on the corpse. He's borderline psychotic. 
The thing that really bothered me was how easily McClane & son hopped around from state to state despite all fucking traffic networks being shut down. The roads are all just totally empty... Really?
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:20 pm |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
It was better then anything directed by Lens Wiseman had a right to be.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:43 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: F+
Didn't work at all. I don't even know what the + is for, I guess Bruce???
Not even for Maggie Q? 
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:49 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
kamaldhamal2007 wrote: Tuukka wrote: Thegun wrote: One final thing, I kind of always loved the Helicopter bit in the trailer thinking how cool it would be, but thinking about it, McClane is against a Helicopter in three of the four films, and the 2nd finale takes place on the wing of a plane. A running theme, much like the big rig chase in a Terminator film. I don't remember right now, but was there an elevator scene in DH2? Because the three other movies in the series have an important action scene that happens in an elevator. nope there was no elevator scene in DH2. There was one in DH3 but it was meh.
Please, the elevator scene in 3 was kick ass "Anyone see the lottery last night...I got the tickets right here bang bang bang" That was an intense scene. There is an elevator in 2, but its only thing is when McClane is denied access.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:17 pm |
|
 |
JURiNG
ef star star kay
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:45 pm Posts: 3016 Location: Cairo, Egypt
|
I watched it again..
still the same, loads of gunshots (although it gave me wtf feeling sometime), incredible action sequences..
everything else.. meh
B-
EDIT: Ok, B.. 
_________________
Last edited by JURiNG on Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:40 pm |
|
 |
liesse00
Commander Coo Coo Bananas
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 10:45 am Posts: 585 Location: North Central Illinois
|
B- Good action, I just can't get into these Die Hard films
_________________Last FMTwitter
|
Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:45 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
great stuff
|
Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:42 am |
|
 |
yearsago
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:20 pm Posts: 491 Location: seattle
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: But then he did a wink thing as in "yeah, I'm in on this" and left the room when the rest of the hackers were killed. Hmmm.
He was trying to warn the other guy. not winking 'yeah I am in on this'
|
Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:55 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
I really did not like this. Then again, I'm not a fan of non-talking Robot/Pirate/Superhero action films. It had a few good moments though.
Overall, the story was weak, the action repetitive, and Bruce's character played out.
C-/D+
|
Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:47 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
I wish it was funnier (Die Hards 1-3 are some of the funniest movies I know, raising action-movie-hero-tough-guy-speak to a profane artform); seriously, the dialogue was really, really weak. And McClane kept calling everyone 'jerk off,' which was pathetic. I also wish that set piece between the truck and the jet was not in the movie. It blew. And Kevin Smith sucks at life.
Despite that, I did like the film. The action really was well shot and exciting. I had fun. Bruce Willis pummeling the shit out of that 'dumb Asian hooker bitch' was misogynistic action filmmaking done right. As was the subsequent cracking wise about her untimely death.
But I don't know what brain hemmorhage is causing some of you to think this is as good (or better!) than any of the originals.
_________________ k
|
Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:59 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
yoshue wrote: I wish it was funnier (Die Hards 1-3 are some of the funniest movies I know, raising action-movie-hero-tough-guy-speak to a profane artform); seriously, the dialogue was really, really weak. And McClane kept calling everyone 'jerk off,' which was pathetic. I also wish that set piece between the truck and the jet was not in the movie. It blew. And Kevin Smith sucks at life.
Despite that, I did like the film. The action really was well shot and exciting. I had fun. Bruce Willis pummeling the shit out of that 'dumb Asian hooker bitch' was misogynistic action filmmaking done right. As was the subsequent cracking wise about her untimely death.
But I don't know what brain hemmorhage is causing some of you to think this is as good (or better!) than any of the originals.
The Jerk offs were easily dubbed most of the time. The unrated will have a new gateway of great curses from John McClane
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:00 pm |
|
 |
Mesjarch
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am Posts: 2388 Location: Poland
|
Easily one of the best summer movies so far this year.
B+
|
Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:40 pm |
|
 |
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm Posts: 8202
|
This summers best flicks are Transformers (A+) and Live free or Die hard (A)
|
Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:22 pm |
|
 |
2001
Another You
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am Posts: 4556
|
I've never seen any of the Die Hard movies and this one wasn't on my "to see" List either, but the traiLer Left me with some interest and the comments on this forum got me excited hoping that it wiLL be as great as my most anticipated fiLm of 2006, M:i:3. And it didn't faiL to Live up with my expectations. From the intruiging storyLine, cars crashing at heLicopters, and ridicuLous one-Liners by Bruce WiLLis, this was just one of the two or three fiLms I've seen in 2007 that never stops from entertaining. Bruce WiLLis gives his best performance since Sin City as 57-year-oLd major ass-kicker better-than-Superman John McLane.
A
|
Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:16 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
I was thoroughly impressed, but that's only because the action scenes were unlike anything I'd seen before. Truly, my mouth was gaping a lot of the time. Luckily, the rest of the movie's not that far behind. The script has some weak spots, but it's mostly solid, and the acting is surprisingly decent. Bruce is Bruce, of course, but Justin Long is pretty funny and Timothy Olyphant is a great villain. The editing a.k.a. censorship bothered me a bit, especially the trademark line, but there's enough snappy dialogue to overcome it. The action was great, but it got to be a bit much by the end of it, especially the truck + jet bit. The climactic scene is aces, though. Not as good as 1 or 3, but miles ahead of 2.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:11 am |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
I'm so glad loyalfromlondon is alive.
|
Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:12 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
Thegun wrote: yoshue wrote: I wish it was funnier (Die Hards 1-3 are some of the funniest movies I know, raising action-movie-hero-tough-guy-speak to a profane artform); seriously, the dialogue was really, really weak. And McClane kept calling everyone 'jerk off,' which was pathetic. I also wish that set piece between the truck and the jet was not in the movie. It blew. And Kevin Smith sucks at life.
Despite that, I did like the film. The action really was well shot and exciting. I had fun. Bruce Willis pummeling the shit out of that 'dumb Asian hooker bitch' was misogynistic action filmmaking done right. As was the subsequent cracking wise about her untimely death.
But I don't know what brain hemmorhage is causing some of you to think this is as good (or better!) than any of the originals. The Jerk offs were easily dubbed most of the time. The unrated will have a new gateway of great curses from John McClane
Weren't they shooting for a PG-13 while filming the movie? I don't think the unrated version is going to have as many new swear words as you think.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:51 am |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
Squeeks wrote: Thegun wrote: yoshue wrote: I wish it was funnier (Die Hards 1-3 are some of the funniest movies I know, raising action-movie-hero-tough-guy-speak to a profane artform); seriously, the dialogue was really, really weak. And McClane kept calling everyone 'jerk off,' which was pathetic. I also wish that set piece between the truck and the jet was not in the movie. It blew. And Kevin Smith sucks at life.
Despite that, I did like the film. The action really was well shot and exciting. I had fun. Bruce Willis pummeling the shit out of that 'dumb Asian hooker bitch' was misogynistic action filmmaking done right. As was the subsequent cracking wise about her untimely death.
But I don't know what brain hemmorhage is causing some of you to think this is as good (or better!) than any of the originals. The Jerk offs were easily dubbed most of the time. The unrated will have a new gateway of great curses from John McClane Weren't they shooting for a PG-13 while filming the movie? I don't think the unrated version is going to have as many new swear words as you think.
No, it was intended as an R up until a couple of months or so ago.
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:56 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
A-
There are two complaints I've got with this film and I'll get them right out of the way before I proceed with all the good stuff. For one, the final showdown was a bit too simple and low-key for my taste. It worked for the first Die Hard film because it came across far more dramatic. Worked not so well in this one, though I must say the "line" worked very well in the context of the ending afterall, heh.
For another (and this is certainly a bigger one)....don't get me wrong. It was a fantastic action movie and the best since Casino Royale (and M:I-3 before that)...but it simply didn't feel like a Die Hard movie. Something was lacking and I can't put my finger on it. It didn't have the same kind of charme/humor. There was humor and it was fun and all, but it was just different.
However, I am judging it on its own merits and for that it was damn entertaining. The running time was perfect and I never felt bored, not even for a second. To my huge surprise, Justin Long made for a decent sidekick to John McClane (though I was certainly missing the chemistry Willis had with Jackson in the third film). Mary E. Winstead was surprisingly good as McClane's sassy daughter. I laughed at her line to Long towards the end of the film. Then...Willis...he was, of course, perfect for a role, though, once again, it did not feel too much like John McClane, but he was still an excellent action hero. The villains, I was not really disappointed with like some of you were. Timothy Olyphant was solid and Maggie Q kicked ass as did the one unstoppable henchman.
The PG-13 rating didn't hurt it too much as it was certainly the most brutal and violent PG-13 movie I have ever seen. Plenty of action...and, boy, was that action awesome! Some of the action setpieces were one of the most exciting I have seen in years. I also liked that they didn't rely too much on CG effects.
On the whole, a very effective, entertaining and well-made actioner. Bring on Die Hard 5!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:40 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|