Author |
Message |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40592
|
It's definitley a deliciously batshit finale... In a good way kind of, but then again not really. It's too much. I'll be shocked if this is all true and they actually go through with it, but who knows.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Tue May 15, 2007 2:53 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: And it's clear now, more than ever before, that there was never an end game when the series started and they were always winging it. You can't freestyle a television series, this isn't Def Jam's Poetry Slam.
I think the exact opposite. It's clear now, more than ever before, that there is an end game when the series started and they rarely winged it.
|
Tue May 15, 2007 8:04 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40592
|
So I guess if that spoil run-through is true, then potentially that means...
The island story will continue until the end of the series I presume(the island IS Lost), but individual character by episode flash forwards will replace the flashbacks, setting up some mystery of the castaways being cursed after leaving the island or something of the sort.
A brilliant move if its true that I never saw coming, works even moreso with the fact that the flashbacks were getting redundant, we know everything about the castaways at this point, this opens up a lot of mystery doors.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed May 16, 2007 3:48 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Shack Your Booty, Love wrote: So I guess if that spoil run-through is true, then potentially that means...
The island story will continue until the end of the series I presume(the island IS Lost), but individual character by episode flash forwards will replace the flashbacks, setting up some mystery of the castaways being cursed after leaving the island or something of the sort.
A brilliant move if its true that I never saw coming, works even moreso with the fact that the flashbacks were getting redundant, we know everything about the castaways at this point, this opens up a lot of mystery doors.
That would actually be a brilliant move.
Unfortunately, it's one I doubt they'll make.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 3:53 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Michael Ausellio commented that next week's season finale is so crazy and full of shit going down, he refuses to reveal anything about it. Awesome.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 4:56 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: And Roo, you're way off base my friend. Way off.
No my friend! You just refuse to believe. 
|
Wed May 16, 2007 8:11 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
No. I know what happens.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 8:18 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: You seem like a reasonable person. Not taking away from the incredible work the Lost team did in season 1 but there's no way they mapped out Episode 1 all the way through to the season 3 finale. It just seems nearly impossible to me.
The direction and vibe as of late reeks of tampering and tinkering based on ratings and network memos and general panic.
I believe the following:
1. The producers have said that they have a plan through the end of the series. I believe this plan is not like Heroes' plan (where the producer has mapped out every single episode in a season) but more like Battlestar Galactica's plan (where there is a roadmap with specific plot points, but there is flexibility built into certain timelines). I believe this because I see things in Season 1 (and 2, which I still like a lot... the only elongated section of this I didn't like was Season 3 up until the Episode 7 break) which are thematically coming back into play.
2. I do believe that Lost has been "sped up" a bit for faster storylines and more resolutions. I think this is a reality of a show like this in a market like this. I believe they have had to make adjustments based on actors (like Mistereko and Michael) that haven't always been the best for the show. But that's the economy of filmmaking, which I'm sure someone like you can respect.
3. I don't believe that the spoilers (which Shack posted is the same as I read) necessarily indicate one thing or another. I think the interpretation is rather open ended and in light of what's happening to Desmond at the moment, premature.
4. I'm all about huge show shake ups... Battlestar's Season 3 is an example... it was very left field but allowed the show to really stretch, and Lost has not disappointed me except for once since Not In Portland (I didn't like the Bai Ling Jack flashback episode). I have no reason to think that this won't continue on into Season 4.
5. The producers have been constant on the ideas that they would not address things like the monster until the end of the series, and Jacob in Season 4, and Rousseau in Season 4, and I don't think that what I see from the spoilers necessarily changes that.
6. I think the spoilers will be more... passive? I think the show will start working somewhat from both ends, reaching a central point. I don't mind really, as long as it remains interesting.
7. People have been predicting that ever since the end of the first Season that the format of the show would change (less flashbacks, etc. etc. etc.) but it hasn't yet.
8. Both previous seasons have ended in similar ways. While it's definately shocking and an advancement, I don't necessarily think it's going to lead to different results... maybe just more clarification on why they can't... you know.
9. If someone like you is unhappy with the show on a fairly consistent basis, I don't see why you wouldn't be more excited by the potential here (although that wasn't really the issue). This may be one of the most left-field Season finales in the history of television, and if they pull it off, all the better for them.
Last edited by roo on Wed May 16, 2007 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 8:34 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
Hehehehe. I say enjoy the ride. It sounds like one hell of an episode
(And ABC wouldn't let them fuck it up too much, especially because they probably let some higher ups at ABC tell them where it was going).
|
Wed May 16, 2007 8:38 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
Libs wrote: Michael Ausellio commented that next week's season finale is so crazy and full of shit going down, he refuses to reveal anything about it. Awesome.
I think the finale will make you very happy. You especially.
But yes, I'd venture to guess that I don't believe a television series has ever had a Season finale like this. I'd like to watch TV series that have "mid-series" finales that have the potential to have this much impact.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 8:41 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
I thought that episode was in A+ territory until the very end...when Charlie didn't die.
The whole thing would've been incredibly poignant and fitting if, you know...he had died. Like he was supposed to.
Awesome to see Bernard and Rose again
Can't wait for next week
|
Wed May 16, 2007 11:03 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Great seeing Rose and Bernard again.
Sort of a non episode. I guess a 3 hour finale is more appropiate.
why isn't jack dead yet?
|
Wed May 16, 2007 11:05 pm |
|
 |
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm Posts: 11808 Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
I was kinda ready for Charlie to die after all that buildup, he really didn't have to hit Desmond, kinda odd "last" movie for him. Isn't that the base Jack and Juliet were at in the beginning of this season?? How did Jack not remember opening a door for it to bust open with water?
|
Wed May 16, 2007 11:06 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
Libs wrote: I thought that episode was in A+ territory until the very end...when Charlie didn't die.
Oh my dear. Remember how I said you would really love the finale?
|
Wed May 16, 2007 11:16 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
If they kill Charlie, they probably want to do it in the Finale. They want to put in the season finalle. Overall, it was a great episode, can't wait for next week.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 11:30 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Another awesome episode. I cannot freakin' wait for the finale. It's gonna be kick ass!!
And Charlie better die, although I was feeling a bit sorry for him after that #1 memory/"I love you" to the baby.
|
Wed May 16, 2007 11:38 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
I did feel very sorry for Charlie, especially the scene with him and Hurley that was a sad moment. Actually if he is going to die I am liking how they are writing his end.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 12:10 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
That was so far and away Charlie's best episode ever. If he does indeed die next week (Considering the hype they've been building up to with a finale massacre or whatever), I might actually be a little sad, which is kinda shocking.
Overall, great build-up episode. I still don't completely trust Elizabeth/Jack for whatever reason though.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 1:52 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
Positive* Jon wrote: That was so far and away Charlie's best episode ever. If he does indeed die next week (Considering the hype they've been building up to with a finale massacre or whatever), I might actually be a little sad, which is kinda shocking.
Me too :'(
My thinking, and I havent read any spoilers or anything, is that the base will somehow be flooded, and he'll still die doing the same thing Desmond had a vision of.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:00 am |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
Another great episode.
The structure of the flashbacks was a bit different.
Instead of being the negative events of someone's life, it ends up being all the positive ones.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:10 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
It was a very good episode. I kind of now hope Charlie doesn't die. Though I haven't hated him nearly as much as others here.
Jack is much worse.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:20 am |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
I liked Charlie up until he went crazy in season 2, but I think I will feel kinda sad if he dies now.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:29 am |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
A soso episode saved by the twist at the end. Charlie's mission made no logical sense. Just because Desmond saw Claire being rescued if Charlie died, doesn't mean that she'd never be rescued. For all Charlie knew if he'd broken the path of events, she might have been rescued two weeks later. It was just too stupid and had no emotional weight. And if he loved Claire so much he'd tell her all about it and not make major decisions that affect her future behind her back.
But the twist at the end saved it for me. It looks like maybe that's where all the fertile women are hiding? Or is it just a Wives of the NRA convention? I don't really want to know what it is till next week.
I was annoyed by Jack being back in charge this episode. Who the hell is he? Everything was so much more interesting when Sawyer was the sort-of leader.
It was watchable and pleasant, I just didn't buy into the central idea that this was something he should do or that it was even so noble.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:59 am |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
|
Thu May 17, 2007 3:18 am |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
Some other random thoughts I forgot to mention:
- Dom M. did a good job.
- When Charlie got in the hatch at the end, it seemed like Juliet might possibly have been lying and if she's lying about that then what else is she holding back?
- That mugging Charlie broke up was really strange. They hid the mugger's face and he behaved kind of odd. I wonder if it will come back in play later in someone else's flashback. Or maybe it was just a bad bit-part actor.
- I was impressed by the period feel of the learning to swim flashback. A lot of effort went into that short scene.
Squee wrote: My thinking, and I havent read any spoilers or anything, is that the base will somehow be flooded, and he'll still die doing the same thing Desmond had a vision of. Same here.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 9:58 am |
|
|