Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 3:49 pm



Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 YES! Edward Norton to play The Incredible Hulk 
Author Message
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
can't look forward to any hulk adaptation because i think remaking a film 5 years after the first of a 'defunked' franchise is retarded on levels unimaginable.


How's this any different than restarting the BATMAN franchise after Joel Schumacher fucked up??? How long was that inbetween his films before Nolan's??? :-k This sounds like damn good casting bringing Norton in..


Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:29 am
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote:
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
can't look forward to any hulk adaptation because i think remaking a film 5 years after the first of a 'defunked' franchise is retarded on levels unimaginable.


How's this any different than restarting the BATMAN franchise after Joel Schumacher fucked up??? How long was that inbetween his films before Nolan's??? :-k This sounds like damn good casting bringing Norton in..


9 years. not 6. and BnR was the 4th film. so you weren't making the same film again.

the restart (remake) for Batman took 16 years, not 9. this isn't about when the last story in teh franchise was released, its about when the same story was told last time.

its just stupid. Ang Lee's Hulk was a classic though people don't like it which is fine. Just keep going with that franchise, even with new directors and actors. Thats fine. Just don't restart it.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:33 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote:
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
can't look forward to any hulk adaptation because i think remaking a film 5 years after the first of a 'defunked' franchise is retarded on levels unimaginable.


How's this any different than restarting the BATMAN franchise after Joel Schumacher fucked up??? How long was that inbetween his films before Nolan's??? :-k This sounds like damn good casting bringing Norton in..


9 years. not 6. and BnR was the 4th film. so you weren't making the same film again.

the restart (remake) for Batman took 16 years, not 9. this isn't about when the last story in teh franchise was released, its about when the same story was told last time.

its just stupid. Ang Lee's Hulk was a classic though people don't like it which is fine. Just keep going with that franchise, even with new directors and actors. Thats fine. Just don't restart it.


Based on it's piss poor domestic take, Universal Studios and the general concensus feels otherwise.. The HULK had ALOT of potential going for it to be as big as SPIDERMAN if it were done properly and in the end, people just didn't embrace it, so your left with the only other alternative: A Reboot.. And whether it was 9 year or 6 years, the BATMAN franchise hit rock bottom and they knew it to.. Otherwise Schumacher would've done BEGINS, nipples on the batsuit and all..


Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:41 am
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
you once again, bring up completely irrelevant stuff.

it doesn't matter how good the hulk film will be; it'll still bomb cause people won't accept another one. Only the fans will.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:06 am
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21904
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
I dont think anyone is denying Norton's Talent, I mean any movie is lucky to have him, but its just so crazy that he's the new Hulk, its almost destined to fail.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:36 am
Profile
Forum General

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 8202
Post 
this wesbite is owned by WB.

ya i said it becasue all here talking crap that hulk will fail are nothing but employees of wb and hence have to support all DC crap. What do u guys have other than superman and batman??? NOTHING!! all are D rate characters whose movies are gonna be utter shit.

how much do u guys get paid for supporting the WB&DC crap??

only WB vertigo comics are good. Superman sucks and batman is watchable but not visually cool.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:41 am
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
kamaldhamal2007 wrote:
this wesbite is owned by WB.

ya i said it becasue all here talking crap that hulk will fail are nothing but employees of wb and hence have to support all DC crap. What do u guys have other than superman and batman??? NOTHING!! all are D rate characters whose movies are gonna be utter shit.

how much do u guys get paid for supporting the WB&DC crap??

only WB vertigo comics are good. Superman sucks and batman is watchable but not visually cool.


there is only one person on this entire site that cares about DC vs Marvel

and thats you.

now go back and cuddle with your Rawhide Kid stuff toy.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:47 am
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21904
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
kamaldhamal2007 wrote:
this wesbite is owned by WB.

ya i said it becasue all here talking crap that hulk will fail are nothing but employees of wb and hence have to support all DC crap. What do u guys have other than superman and batman??? NOTHING!! all are D rate characters whose movies are gonna be utter shit.

how much do u guys get paid for supporting the WB&DC crap??

only WB vertigo comics are good. Superman sucks and batman is watchable but not visually cool.


Wow, you finally unlocked our secret. Your right, we do get paid off monthly. Whats your excuse for being a bitch?

Fuck Marvel vs. DC, its like comparing Anal Sex with Frontal Sex, either way your fucked, and their are fans of both, but not necessarily one or the other.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:09 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
you once again, bring up completely irrelevant stuff.

it doesn't matter how good the hulk film will be; it'll still bomb cause people won't accept another one. Only the fans will.


If they went with a Bruce Jones storyline having Bruce Banner on the run like The Fugitive and doing some sort of S.H.I.E.L.D Storyline, the audience might buy into it, BUT, 4 things will need to happen to make this work:

1. No Nick Nolte.. Not now.. Not ever again no matter how good an actor he is..

2. Use a real bodybuilder and use today's CGI Technology to superimpose his size so you have something that looks real and is real instead of a 100% Effect like the last time..

3. 3X The action instead of making it a Greek tragedy and being all about Hulk having daddy issues..

4. Make it Rated-R and intense..


Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:35 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21904
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote:
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
you once again, bring up completely irrelevant stuff.

it doesn't matter how good the hulk film will be; it'll still bomb cause people won't accept another one. Only the fans will.


If they went with a Bruce Jones storyline having Bruce Banner on the run like The Fugitive and doing some sort of S.H.I.E.L.D Storyline, the audience might buy into it, BUT, 4 things will need to happen to make this work:

1. No Nick Nolte.. Not now.. Not ever again no matter how good an actor he is..

2. Use a real bodybuilder and use today's CGI Technology to superimpose his size so you have something that looks real and is real instead of a 100% Effect like the last time..

3. 3X The action instead of making it a Greek tragedy and being all about Hulk having daddy issues..

4. Make it Rated-R and intense..


While I agree with all of them, #4 would kill its chances at being a success even more than it has going against it already. It's budget will most likely be 150 million or so. Would you make a comic book movie that's previous film had the worst multiplier of all time for a 60+ opener and make it R. Because of the last movie, the general movie audience will be very much turned off without it being R. I think they'd want it as accessible as possible.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:46 pm
Profile
Forum General

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 8202
Post 
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote:
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
you once again, bring up completely irrelevant stuff.

it doesn't matter how good the hulk film will be; it'll still bomb cause people won't accept another one. Only the fans will.


If they went with a Bruce Jones storyline having Bruce Banner on the run like The Fugitive and doing some sort of S.H.I.E.L.D Storyline, the audience might buy into it, BUT, 4 things will need to happen to make this work:

1. No Nick Nolte.. Not now.. Not ever again no matter how good an actor he is..

2. Use a real bodybuilder and use today's CGI Technology to superimpose his size so you have something that looks real and is real instead of a 100% Effect like the last time..

3. 3X The action instead of making it a Greek tragedy and being all about Hulk having daddy issues..

4. Make it Rated-R and intense..


forget 4. U won't get an R Rated flick. Maybe it will be intense but not R rated. U guys come up with some conditions and if not delivered u bash the flick.

BKB i support you but i don't agree on this flick being R rated.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:48 pm
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote:
JaWS mCbunty wrote:
you once again, bring up completely irrelevant stuff.

it doesn't matter how good the hulk film will be; it'll still bomb cause people won't accept another one. Only the fans will.


If they went with a Bruce Jones storyline having Bruce Banner on the run like The Fugitive and doing some sort of S.H.I.E.L.D Storyline, the audience might buy into it, BUT, 4 things will need to happen to make this work:

1. No Nick Nolte.. Not now.. Not ever again no matter how good an actor he is..

2. Use a real bodybuilder and use today's CGI Technology to superimpose his size so you have something that looks real and is real instead of a 100% Effect like the last time..

3. 3X The action instead of making it a Greek tragedy and being all about Hulk having daddy issues..

4. Make it Rated-R and intense..


Yup.

So long as they don't make it look like a restart but just a continuation of Hulk, it coould work in my opinion.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:53 pm
Profile WWW
Star Trek XI

Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:23 pm
Posts: 337
Location: London
Post 
Wow Norton as the new Hulk, this news came way outta leftfield. Sounds awesome though, but an actor is only as good as the material he's given. I hope the script is atleast passable, even dare I say it good. With RDJ playing Iron Man it does seem Marvel are getting some calibre actors to play their comic book hereos, perhaps taking a leaf from Batman Begins, which could bod well interms of the quality of the movies themselfs.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:01 pm
Profile WWW
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:48 am
Posts: 409
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Post 
This is definitely some different news, but good news. Norton is fantastic in just about everything he does. I for one would really like them to tone down the CG. Get a cool looking suit like Del Toro did for Hellboy and get some great set pieces along with good effects like Batman Begins and this will be great :happy: .


Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:52 pm
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post 
Norton.

Hmmm.

I don't fawn over him like many, but I think this is a bad decision.

A lot will hinge on the script and the director.


Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:33 pm
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
I actually don't like this decision at all.

I've never particularly liked Edward Norton (I only liked him in Primal Fear, American History X, and Fight Club) and he doesn't seem right for the character. Not to mention I hated the original film but thought Eric Bana was perfect. I think I'll pass on this.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:44 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.