Author |
Message |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
 The Gurus of Gold Oscar Preview
http://www.moviecitynews.com/awards/200 ... 60906.html
These guys were pretty much embarrassingly bad when they made early predictions last season, so remember that when checking out this year's early charts.
I need to have a talk with Sasha Stone... 
Last edited by Maverikk on Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:37 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
It is not looking bad for them this year, but...what the hell does WTC do above United 93?!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:39 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: It is not looking bad for them this year, but...what the hell does WTC do above United 93?!
I wish I had their early charts from last year. These are "experts"? Some of them let their personal bias cloud their objectivity, for instance, Sasha Stone's continous push and spin doctoring for King Kong. (I see she's on the Dreamgirls bandwagon this year) I have no idea why WTC would even make it on any lists. It's clearly out of the running.
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:42 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
The Last King of Scotland is off the charts...LMS is below WTC...hehehe
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:44 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Bobby's on ONE list. 
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:45 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Great thing about Flags is that its out the gate early and we'll know soon whether or not its golden.
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:06 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Kit Kat Klub wrote: Great thing about Flags is that its out the gate early and we'll know soon whether or not its golden.
It's got the problem of unfair expectations that it has to overcome. It's almost like it's expected to be a masterpiece, and anything less will be a letdown. That's the biggest hurdle it faces.
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:16 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Maverikk wrote: Kit Kat Klub wrote: Great thing about Flags is that its out the gate early and we'll know soon whether or not its golden. It's got the problem of unfair expectations that it has to overcome. It's almost like it's expected to be a masterpiece, and anything less will be a letdown. That's the biggest hurdle it faces.
you summed it up.
It would be easier to gauge if Eastwood had directed something this large before. But this is completely uncharted waters.
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:27 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Maverikk wrote: Bobby's on ONE list. 
And it's from Kris Tapley, who saw the film and gave it 3.5 stars out of 4.
His grades on the contenders he has seen so far:
4 stars - Babel, The Last King of Scotland
3.5 stars - Bobby, Little Miss Sunshine, The Queen, World Trade Center
3 stars - Hollywoodland, United 93
2.5 stars - Little Children
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:29 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
xiayun wrote: Maverikk wrote: Bobby's on ONE list.  And it's from Kris Tapley, who saw the film and gave it 3.5 stars out of 4. His grades on the contenders he has seen so far: 4 stars - Babel, The Last King of Scotland 3.5 stars - Bobby, Little Miss Sunshine, The Queen, World Trade Center 3 stars - Hollywoodland, United 93 2.5 stars - Little Children
Babel looks like it's definitely going to be fighting for a spot. Those first 3 listed just might make the grade.
Bobby
The Last King of Scotland
Babel
The Good German
Little Children
Possible combination, yes. There are many possibilities that will join Bobby in the top 5.
Bobby
Flags of Our Fathers
The Good Shepherd
Dreamgirls
The Departed
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:01 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40499
|
WTC being so high is ridiculous.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:02 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23335 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
From the current buzz - the best contenders for BP with a realistic chance of a nod are:
Bobby
Dreamgirls
Babel
Little Children
The rest we will just have to wait and see...
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:01 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Are we perhaps jumping the gun on Bobby? Things are looking positive at the moment, but so many things can and do go wrong. But it's definitely in play, something I would have doubted just a few weeks back.
And I'm feeling a bit down on Flags at the moment. Just a bit.
_________________ k
|
Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:41 pm |
|
 |
the limey
Speed Racer
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm Posts: 135
|
Maverikk wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: It is not looking bad for them this year, but...what the hell does WTC do above United 93?! I wish I had their early charts from last year. These are "experts"? Some of them let their personal bias cloud their objectivity, for instance, Sasha Stone's continous push and spin doctoring for King Kong. (I see she's on the Dreamgirls bandwagon this year) I have no idea why WTC would even make it on any lists. It's clearly out of the running.
I find all of these amateur sites utterly clueless. 'Nice website, shame about the content' seems to sum it up. Tapley & Stone are downright embarrassing in the way they shill for whatever movie catches their fancy at any particular moment. The most frustrating thing is that not only that they can't seem to put their personal biases aside but they also don't seem to have any real clue as to how the Academy works.
|
Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:13 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
the limey wrote: I find all of these amateur sites utterly clueless. 'Nice website, shame about the content' seems to sum it up. Tapley & Stone are downright embarrassing in the way they shill for whatever movie catches their fancy at any particular moment. The most frustrating thing is that not only that they can't seem to put their personal biases aside but they also don't seem to have any real clue as to how the Academy works.
Yes, definitely.
When you're shooting for credibility, the worst thing you can do is bury it by defying logic and replcaing it with a bias that is not hard to identify as nothing more than that. Many of these "experts" do seem quite in the dark about the process of awards season. It's not that hard to keep your objectivity concerning all of this stuff. Flags of Our Fathers is definitely my #1 Oscar hopeful, but I'd be fooling myself if I didn't realize the kinds of obstacles that are in front of it. Five other films could easily come in and rip the rug right out from under it. When films that those guys are backing hit a brick wall, they seem to prefer spinning the situation instead of showing any ability to quickly recognize what just happened.
|
Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:12 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
yoshue wrote: Are we perhaps jumping the gun on Bobby? Things are looking positive at the moment, but so many things can and do go wrong. But it's definitely in play, something I would have doubted just a few weeks back.
No, I don't jump guns, I only go with my gut when I'm very sure, and I'm very sure about Bobby being a BP nominee. 
|
Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:17 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Maverikk wrote: yoshue wrote: Are we perhaps jumping the gun on Bobby? Things are looking positive at the moment, but so many things can and do go wrong. But it's definitely in play, something I would have doubted just a few weeks back. No, I don't jump guns, I only go with my gut when I'm very sure, and I'm very sure about Bobby being a BP nominee. 
But so were you about Walk the Line this early in the year
At this point there is not a single BP nominee lock.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:02 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: But so were you about Walk the Line this early in the year  At this point there is not a single BP nominee lock.
Do you REALLY want to compare my track record last year against yours? I'd gladly do a compariosn between you and me if you would like. Just give the word.
Bobby is a Best Picture lock. Case closed.
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:09 am |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: It is not looking bad for them this year, but...what the hell does WTC do above United 93?!
What's Volver doing above both of them?
As much as I'd love my Spanish darling to be that close to a bp nomination, or even a direction nomination, its just not going to happen.
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:10 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Maverikk wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: But so were you about Walk the Line this early in the year  At this point there is not a single BP nominee lock. Do you REALLY want to compare my track record last year against yours? I'd gladly do a compariosn between you and me if you would like. Just give the word. Bobby is a Best Picture lock. Case closed.
Oh, are we offended?  Thing is, I am not pointing out anything as a lock for a BP nom at this point. You are. Last year you did the same to WTL whereas you should realize that at this point of the year NOTHING is a lock.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:31 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
dolcevita wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: It is not looking bad for them this year, but...what the hell does WTC do above United 93?! What's Volver doing above both of them? As much as I'd love my Spanish darling to be that close to a bp nomination, or even a direction nomination, its just not going to happen.
Why not? He was nominated for Direction/Screenplay for Talk to Her (for the screenplay Oscar even, I think). Volver is much more "mainstream" than his recent films and it has been hailed by critics and audiences alike so far.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:32 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Oh, are we offended?  Thing is, I am not pointing out anything as a lock for a BP nom at this point. You are. Last year you did the same to WTL whereas you should realize that at this point of the year NOTHING is a lock.
Not offended at all. Walk the Line was a legit snub.
Now, would you like to compare you against me since you brought it up, and we'll see who comes out on top? If trying to discredit is your game, and that's what is was, we can take that a big step forward.
Bobby is a lock. Mark it down.
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:36 am |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: dolcevita wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: It is not looking bad for them this year, but...what the hell does WTC do above United 93?! What's Volver doing above both of them? As much as I'd love my Spanish darling to be that close to a bp nomination, or even a direction nomination, its just not going to happen. Why not? He was nominated for Direction/Screenplay for Talk to Her (for the screenplay Oscar even, I think). Volver is much more "mainstream" than his recent films and it has been hailed by critics and audiences alike so far.
That was his peak. Notice he got nothing for the movies he did after that. Also, that was because he was snubbed for official Spanish selection, so unless the Academy awarded him in unorthodox nominations, Talk to Her wouldn't have even shown up that night anywhere on the ballot.
Its incredibly hard for a foreign movie to get a bp nom. Its happened maybe twice (Crouching Tiger, Life is Beautiful) in all my memories of the event. And I know Almodovar. As "main stream" as everyone says Volver is, the man is just a little too quirky, to make bp stuff.
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:41 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
dolcevita wrote: What's Volver doing above both of them?
As much as I'd love my Spanish darling to be that close to a bp nomination, or even a direction nomination, its just not going to happen.
Yeah, I'd definitely agree that Volver isn't going to get anything (unless the reviews are so tremendous that it can't be denied)
Penelope Cruz is that picture's best shot.
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:52 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Maverikk wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Oh, are we offended?  Thing is, I am not pointing out anything as a lock for a BP nom at this point. You are. Last year you did the same to WTL whereas you should realize that at this point of the year NOTHING is a lock. Not offended at all. Walk the Line was a legit snub. Now, would you like to compare you against me since you brought it up, and we'll see who comes out on top? If trying to discredit is your game, and that's what is was, we can take that a big step forward. Bobby is a lock. Mark it down.
This is how it always is. Whenever someone calls you on something you try to compare and show that you're obviously "better", but the difference is that right now I am not pinning down anything as a lokc while you are. Back at the same point last year I pinned down Geisha as a lock and you WTL both turned out to be wrong. I learned my lesson and not calling anything a lock in early September. You are. It is not about comparisons between me and you it is about you and just you.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:31 pm |
|
|