Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Author |
Message |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
Cars 1010, +36, B+
The Omen 3573, 409 today, +18, C+
A Prairie Home Companion 0 (Not Active)
3 more updates left.
PEACE, Mike.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:37 am |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12193
|
I'm going to go with $14.66 m for Friday.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:41 am |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
I dunno, maybe I'm not seeing things right, but it really looks like The Omen fell off the face of the earth. Decrease into friday perhaps? If not, I just can't see it mustering up a very good increase. It would have to have a very tiny (seemingly unrealistic) ratio for it to increase the normal 70+%-ish expected. Maybe xiayun can shed some light.
PEACE, Mike.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:42 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
That looks really bad for The Omen. It might not top $4m with the projected ratio, though I guess it could be a little high. I think it'll land around Scott V's guess of $5m Friday.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:45 am |
|
 |
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm Posts: 11808 Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
I wouldn't look into The Omen's reviews too closey. It just confirms that people knew its opening day was Tuesday, so there won't be any bigger business due to misconception. Holdover reviews are bit odd to track, DP07 did that for awhile I believe.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:48 am |
|
 |
Eventine
Too Brilliant for Introductions
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:45 am Posts: 3073
|
It was done with ROTS.
_________________
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:51 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
The Incredibles had problem at Yahoo during its first day: Yahoo didn't open its grading until early in the afternoon, I think, so that could've lowered its ratio. I agree a ratio of 70 is possible to probable for Cars, but I don't see it being as low as 60, so $20m is definitely out. $15-17m right now, and may modify it slightly according to the final three hours.
The Omen indeed really slowed down. It may have a lower ratio than its opening Tuesday's. We've seen that with Wednesday releases (Spider-Man 2), so $5m is still possible, but that's the high end. Can't see it being close to $6m.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:55 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I don't really see more than $16 million in store for Cars, but definitely no less than $13.5 million. At the very worst, it'll open to $47-48 million, at the very very best to $57-59 million. Either way, a $190+ million total is assured.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:57 am |
|
 |
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I don't really see more than $16 million in store for Cars, but definitely no less than $13.5 million. At the very worst, it'll open to $47-48 million, at the very very best to $57-59 million. Either way, a $190+ million total is assured.
I'm in full agreement. I really don't see any more than 1200 reviews for the day and a ratio around 75. I could see a realistic weekend total in the low 50's.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:01 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
MikeQ. wrote: Eventine wrote: Can't wait for the Xia report.  Xiayun is good as well because I consider him remarkably neutral. He never seems to let his own prediction/opinion bias his interpretation of the yahoo reviews, so we don't get a runthrough that is twisted to fit whatever he wants, like some people do at times. PEACE, Mike.
Cold.

|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:07 am |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
DP07 wrote: MikeQ. wrote: Eventine wrote: Can't wait for the Xia report.  Xiayun is good as well because I consider him remarkably neutral. He never seems to let his own prediction/opinion bias his interpretation of the yahoo reviews, so we don't get a runthrough that is twisted to fit whatever he wants, like some people do at times. PEACE, Mike. Cold. 
That comment was definately NOT directed towards you. Seriously. I meant the passerbyers who like to look at the numbers and then try to make them fit their view, sometimes. You are one of the "originals" like xiayun, heh.
PEACE, Mike.
Last edited by MikeQ. on Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:09 am |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12193
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I don't really see more than $16 million in store for Cars, but definitely no less than $13.5 million. At the very worst, it'll open to $47-48 million, at the very very best to $57-59 million. Either way, a $190+ million total is assured.
From a 47 m weekend, I don't think $190 m + is assured. That is a 4.04 multiplier, and with the double whammie of Superman in its 3rd weekend, POTC II in its 4th. Garfield should take away a little of the audience, but this doesn't have Nemo's box office environment, and the competition now is going to be quite high.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:09 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:11 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
MikeQ. wrote: DP07 wrote: MikeQ. wrote: Eventine wrote: Can't wait for the Xia report.  Xiayun is good as well because I consider him remarkably neutral. He never seems to let his own prediction/opinion bias his interpretation of the yahoo reviews, so we don't get a runthrough that is twisted to fit whatever he wants, like some people do at times. PEACE, Mike. Cold.  That comment was definately NOT directed towards you. Seriously. I meant the passerbyers who like to look at the numbers and then try to make them fit their view, sometimes. You are one of the "originals" like xiayun, heh. PEACE, Mike.
Don't worry if it was about me. heh. I know I'm often too aggressive with my projections since the straightforward old analysis is boring for me, and I like to get creative with my projections. Looking for something different can be good in certain areas, but in sound, reasoned, analysis, often not so much. 
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:15 am |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
DP07 wrote: MikeQ. wrote: DP07 wrote: MikeQ. wrote: Eventine wrote: Can't wait for the Xia report.  Xiayun is good as well because I consider him remarkably neutral. He never seems to let his own prediction/opinion bias his interpretation of the yahoo reviews, so we don't get a runthrough that is twisted to fit whatever he wants, like some people do at times. PEACE, Mike. Cold.  That comment was definately NOT directed towards you. Seriously. I meant the passerbyers who like to look at the numbers and then try to make them fit their view, sometimes. You are one of the "originals" like xiayun, heh. PEACE, Mike. Don't worry if it was about me. heh. I know I'm often too aggressive with my projections since the straightforward old analysis is boring for me, and I like to get creative with my projections. Looking for something different can be good in certain areas, but in sound, reasoned, analysis, often not so much. 
Well, it wasn't directed at you, that's the truth.
And you guys think Cars will land at around 1200 reviews for today? I sure hope so, but I'm seeing about 1100 (average 30 reviews for the last 3 updates). Maybe I'm underestimating the last few hours (which would be nice).
I'm going to predict a 65-70 ratio. So whatever the total review count ends up being, divided by that = my prediction.
PEACE, Mike.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:17 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
DP07 wrote: I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m.
Meaning a weekend higher than $50m. Didn't you say that was impossible? 
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:18 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Zingaling wrote: DP07 wrote: I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m. Meaning a weekend higher than $50m. Didn't you say that was impossible? 
Looks right around 50m to me. I said over 55m was impossible. Just over 50m was best case. 
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:21 am |
|
 |
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
All along, I've been viewing this as standard kids' fare, but there does seem to be some adult Nascar turnout (a little odd to me) which may keep this ratio at 80+.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:26 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: Zingaling wrote: DP07 wrote: I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m. Meaning a weekend higher than $50m. Didn't you say that was impossible?  Looks right around 50m to me. I said over 55m was impossible. Just over 50m was best case. 
Yeah, but c'mon, there are worlds between your "It'll be a huge disappointment!!! $41 million!" and a $50 million opening.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:27 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Zingaling wrote: DP07 wrote: I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m. Meaning a weekend higher than $50m. Didn't you say that was impossible?  Looks right around 50m to me. I said over 55m was impossible. Just over 50m was best case.  Yeah, but c'mon, there are worlds between your "It'll be a huge disappointment!!! $41 million!" and a $50 million opening.
Worlds? There were many over 70m (half in that poll), and more then a couple over 80m. You, Xiayun, Zing, and a few others look to be closest I think.
And I don't use more then one exclamation point!

|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:34 am |
|
 |
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Cars 1024, +14, B+
The Omen 3579, 519 today, +6, C+
A Prairie Home Companion 0 (Not Active)
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:37 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Or maybe less then 1,200. I think 14m-14.5m if that's the case.
BTW, someone must have miscalculated the Omen number at some point. I has more then that Friday.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:39 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Omen started at 3060, so that's 519 for the day.
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:40 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Zingaling wrote: DP07 wrote: I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m. Meaning a weekend higher than $50m. Didn't you say that was impossible?  Looks right around 50m to me. I said over 55m was impossible. Just over 50m was best case.  Yeah, but c'mon, there are worlds between your "It'll be a huge disappointment!!! $41 million!" and a $50 million opening. Worlds? There were many over 70m (half in that poll), and more then a couple over 80m. You, Xiayun, Zing, and a few others look to be closest I think. And I don't use more then one exclamation point! 
Usually you use none, but I think that brought my point home more clearly. : )
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:40 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Zingaling wrote: DP07 wrote: I'm thinking 1225. It's more frontloaded then most other CG animated movies without the frontpage, so that could confirm the ratio will be higher then OTH. Also obviously more adult then OTH (can't go lower then 20% non-family).
So I'm guessing about 15m. Meaning a weekend higher than $50m. Didn't you say that was impossible?  Looks right around 50m to me. I said over 55m was impossible. Just over 50m was best case.  Yeah, but c'mon, there are worlds between your "It'll be a huge disappointment!!! $41 million!" and a $50 million opening. Worlds? There were many over 70m (half in that poll), and more then a couple over 80m. You, Xiayun, Zing, and a few others look to be closest I think. And I don't use more then one exclamation point!  Usually you use none, but I think that brought my point home more clearly. : )
No it didn't!!!!
J/K
|
Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:41 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|