Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 6:14 pm



Reply to topic  [ 674 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 27  Next
 The Da Vinci Code prediction thread 

Do I have way to high of expectations for DVC
Total votes : 0

 The Da Vinci Code prediction thread 
Author Message
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:
trixster wrote:
DP07 wrote:
trixster wrote:
DP07 wrote:
100m weekend, 100m weekend. Mark my words.

Seriously I don't see how this won't open with a minimum of 75m.

It'll be big, but I don't see a huge opening weekend. Its audience isn't the type to rush out to see it. $60-65 million opening, with a small drop over Memorial Day, and good legs. $225 million minimum, with a shot at $300 million.


Well, I now have it earning 340m total.

Knowing you, that doesn't surprise me at all. :tongue:

What do you have Pirates 2 at now? ;)


162m/515m


What numbers would you consider disappointing for it?


Under Shrek 2


Sun May 07, 2006 11:21 pm
Profile ICQ
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:
trixster wrote:
DP07 wrote:
trixster wrote:
DP07 wrote:
100m weekend, 100m weekend. Mark my words.

Seriously I don't see how this won't open with a minimum of 75m.

It'll be big, but I don't see a huge opening weekend. Its audience isn't the type to rush out to see it. $60-65 million opening, with a small drop over Memorial Day, and good legs. $225 million minimum, with a shot at $300 million.


Well, I now have it earning 340m total.

Knowing you, that doesn't surprise me at all. :tongue:

What do you have Pirates 2 at now? ;)


162m/515m


What numbers would you consider disappointing for it?


Under Shrek 2


This will be another Batman Begins/The Ring Two for you ;)

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun May 07, 2006 11:22 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:
trixster wrote:
DP07 wrote:
trixster wrote:
DP07 wrote:
100m weekend, 100m weekend. Mark my words.

Seriously I don't see how this won't open with a minimum of 75m.

It'll be big, but I don't see a huge opening weekend. Its audience isn't the type to rush out to see it. $60-65 million opening, with a small drop over Memorial Day, and good legs. $225 million minimum, with a shot at $300 million.


Well, I now have it earning 340m total.

Knowing you, that doesn't surprise me at all. :tongue:

What do you have Pirates 2 at now? ;)


162m/515m


What numbers would you consider disappointing for it?


Under Shrek 2


This will be another Batman Begins/The Ring Two for you ;)


Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years.

Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. ;)


Sun May 07, 2006 11:29 pm
Profile ICQ
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
DP07 wrote:

Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years.

Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. ;)


Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun May 07, 2006 11:31 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:

Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years.

Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. ;)


Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million.


Like what? I bet I could name you something for all of them. ;)


Sun May 07, 2006 11:32 pm
Profile ICQ
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:

Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years.

Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. ;)


Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million.


Like what?


What about Toy Story 2? Or The Matrix Reloaded...oh yeah, people were disappointed with that one which gave it bad legs. Ever considered that people might be disappointed with POTC2 as well?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun May 07, 2006 11:35 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Moving the topic back to the actual film for the thread: :)
Catholic moviegoers overseas defy Vatican and sell out Da Vinci Code in advance.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Sun May 07, 2006 11:36 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film...


Sun May 07, 2006 11:50 pm
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film...


Uh, they're Europeans, so they don't count, duhz.

Anyway, how should this do overseas? Obviously its a very American-center phenomenom, but the fact that its selling out in Europe makes me wonder if this has a shot at taking the overseas crown from Ice Age 2. $450M+?


Sun May 07, 2006 11:54 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Positive Jon wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film...


Uh, they're Europeans, so they don't count, duhz.

Obviously its a very American-center phenomenom


Um, no. Even though I fail to understand why, this book topped the bestseller list here for like...forever. And now that it's out as softcover, it's back at #1. Everyone and their grandma has heard of it.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Mon May 08, 2006 12:04 am
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:

Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years.

Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. ;)


Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million.


Like what?


What about Toy Story 2? Or The Matrix Reloaded...oh yeah, people were disappointed with that one which gave it bad legs. Ever considered that people might be disappointed with POTC2 as well?


I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.

POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.

As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.

That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.


Mon May 08, 2006 12:06 am
Profile ICQ
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Positive Jon wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film...


Uh, they're Europeans, so they don't count, duhz.

Obviously its a very American-center phenomenom


Um, no. Even though I fail to understand why, this book topped the bestseller list here for like...forever. And now that it's out as softcover, it's back at #1. Everyone and their grandma has heard of it.


Well, by American Centered Phenomenom, I mean it all started in the U.S., then spread overseas (To equal success, judging from your description). So in that regard, Harry Potter would be a UK Centered Phenomenom that spread overseas.


Mon May 08, 2006 12:12 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
DP07 wrote:

I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.

POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.

As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.

That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.



By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well.

What about Spider-Man 2?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Mon May 08, 2006 12:16 am
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:

I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.

POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.

As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.

That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.



By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well.

What about Spider-Man 2?


National Treasure was like POTC. It didn't have a fanbase, so it had to build it's own. It had great legs, but that will only take you so far in the DVD era. The sequel will be huge.

Spider-Man had a minority that didn't like it, and didn't return.


Mon May 08, 2006 1:14 am
Profile ICQ
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post 
In Australia, the only organisation that is boycotting DVC are the Anglicans. They've raised $50k AUD to combat the film. I don't know how.

But it's funny that Catholics are more open minded.


Mon May 08, 2006 1:21 am
Profile
I just lost the game
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 pm
Posts: 5868
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Moving the topic back to the actual film for the thread: :)
Catholic moviegoers overseas defy Vatican and sell out Da Vinci Code in advance.


Good. Boycotting the film doesn't make sense. It's only giving power to the story (which is fictional). Boycotss create controversy, controversay creates awareness, awareness creates more moviegoers. :bang:

_________________
Image


Mon May 08, 2006 1:34 am
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40248
Post 
Pirates had a minority that didn't like it and won't return too, my mom walked out of the theatre. Lots of seniors and stuff, that were turned away by the cannonballs and action, won't come back.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon May 08, 2006 1:41 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:

I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.

POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.

As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.

That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.



By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well.

What about Spider-Man 2?


National Treasure was like POTC. It didn't have a fanbase, so it had to build it's own. It had great legs, but that will only take you so far in the DVD era. The sequel will be huge.

Spider-Man had a minority that didn't like it, and didn't return.


Um...I am sure some minority didn't like POTC as well...

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Mon May 08, 2006 3:16 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Official running time is 2 hours and 28 minutes.


Mon May 08, 2006 6:08 am
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23250
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
I tell you now - this will fight to be the No.1 film of the summer.

Opening over $70m with a $300m finish

Alot of people here are underestimating it.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Mon May 08, 2006 7:04 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
DP07 wrote:

I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.

POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.

As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.

That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.



By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well.

What about Spider-Man 2?


National Treasure was like POTC. It didn't have a fanbase, so it had to build it's own. It had great legs, but that will only take you so far in the DVD era. The sequel will be huge.

Spider-Man had a minority that didn't like it, and didn't return.


Um...I am sure some minority didn't like POTC as well...

I think the difference between Spider-Man and POTC is that Spidey had a built-in fanbase, a huge one (given the record breaking opening), and couldn't really expand its audience that much more. POTC had to create its fanbase, and the enormous legs and DVD sales did so. So its fanbase is now bigger than Spidey's, I would argue. I don't see how Pirates 2 is going to make less than the original, since its fanbase has only gone up since then.

But we're really off topic... :tongue:

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Mon May 08, 2006 1:38 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 9148
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
Post 
MadGez wrote:
Alot of people here are underestimating it.


The one problem I have with DVC is that I can't see it pulling in the kid/teen demo, which is really what would drive a big opening like this. Plus, I imagine a bunch of parents may get stuck dragging the little ones to Over The Hedge.


Mon May 08, 2006 1:48 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Rolling Thunder wrote:
MadGez wrote:
Alot of people here are underestimating it.


The one problem I have with DVC is that I can't see it pulling in the kid/teen demo, which is really what would drive a big opening like this. Plus, I imagine a bunch of parents may get stuck dragging the little ones to Over The Hedge.

I'm positive teens would rather go to DVC than OTH. A lot of teens have read the book, and a lot enjoyed it. DVC is not just an 'adult' thriller. It's an adaptation of the biggest novel of our time. It'll be huge.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Mon May 08, 2006 1:51 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32578
Location: the last free city
Post 
It should do between $40-$50m.
OTH WILL beat it though. :tongue: $50 plus.

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Mon May 08, 2006 1:51 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
revolutions wrote:
It should do between $40-$50m.
OTH WILL beat it though. :tongue: $50 plus.

Blasphemy. :mad:

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Mon May 08, 2006 1:52 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 674 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 27  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.