The Da Vinci Code prediction thread
The Da Vinci Code prediction thread
Author |
Message |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: trixster wrote: DP07 wrote: trixster wrote: DP07 wrote: 100m weekend, 100m weekend. Mark my words.
Seriously I don't see how this won't open with a minimum of 75m. It'll be big, but I don't see a huge opening weekend. Its audience isn't the type to rush out to see it. $60-65 million opening, with a small drop over Memorial Day, and good legs. $225 million minimum, with a shot at $300 million. Well, I now have it earning 340m total. Knowing you, that doesn't surprise me at all. What do you have Pirates 2 at now?  162m/515m What numbers would you consider disappointing for it?
Under Shrek 2
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:21 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: trixster wrote: DP07 wrote: trixster wrote: DP07 wrote: 100m weekend, 100m weekend. Mark my words.
Seriously I don't see how this won't open with a minimum of 75m. It'll be big, but I don't see a huge opening weekend. Its audience isn't the type to rush out to see it. $60-65 million opening, with a small drop over Memorial Day, and good legs. $225 million minimum, with a shot at $300 million. Well, I now have it earning 340m total. Knowing you, that doesn't surprise me at all. What do you have Pirates 2 at now?  162m/515m What numbers would you consider disappointing for it? Under Shrek 2
This will be another Batman Begins/The Ring Two for you 
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:22 pm |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: trixster wrote: DP07 wrote: trixster wrote: DP07 wrote: 100m weekend, 100m weekend. Mark my words.
Seriously I don't see how this won't open with a minimum of 75m. It'll be big, but I don't see a huge opening weekend. Its audience isn't the type to rush out to see it. $60-65 million opening, with a small drop over Memorial Day, and good legs. $225 million minimum, with a shot at $300 million. Well, I now have it earning 340m total. Knowing you, that doesn't surprise me at all. What do you have Pirates 2 at now?  162m/515m What numbers would you consider disappointing for it? Under Shrek 2 This will be another Batman Begins/The Ring Two for you 
Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years.
Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. 
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:29 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years. Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO. 
Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:31 pm |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years. Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO.  Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million.
Like what? I bet I could name you something for all of them. 
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:32 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years. Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO.  Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million. Like what?
What about Toy Story 2? Or The Matrix Reloaded...oh yeah, people were disappointed with that one which gave it bad legs. Ever considered that people might be disappointed with POTC2 as well?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:35 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:36 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film...
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:50 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Zingaling wrote: So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film...
Uh, they're Europeans, so they don't count, duhz.
Anyway, how should this do overseas? Obviously its a very American-center phenomenom, but the fact that its selling out in Europe makes me wonder if this has a shot at taking the overseas crown from Ice Age 2. $450M+?
|
Sun May 07, 2006 11:54 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Positive Jon wrote: Zingaling wrote: So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film... Uh, they're Europeans, so they don't count, duhz. Obviously its a very American-center phenomenom
Um, no. Even though I fail to understand why, this book topped the bestseller list here for like...forever. And now that it's out as softcover, it's back at #1. Everyone and their grandma has heard of it.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon May 08, 2006 12:04 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Nope, I learnt my lessons from those. This one has everything going for it, from marketing, to moneyshots, to the most popular and widest appealing original film in 25 years. Just name me one possible negative thing for this movie's BO.  Why should I? A gross of $350 million is not bad. There are several films that have no negative factors and they still don't pass $400 million. Like what? What about Toy Story 2? Or The Matrix Reloaded...oh yeah, people were disappointed with that one which gave it bad legs. Ever considered that people might be disappointed with POTC2 as well?
I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.
POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.
As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.
That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.
|
Mon May 08, 2006 12:06 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Positive Jon wrote: Zingaling wrote: So much for neo_wolf's argument about Catholics boycotting the film... Uh, they're Europeans, so they don't count, duhz. Obviously its a very American-center phenomenom Um, no. Even though I fail to understand why, this book topped the bestseller list here for like...forever. And now that it's out as softcover, it's back at #1. Everyone and their grandma has heard of it.
Well, by American Centered Phenomenom, I mean it all started in the U.S., then spread overseas (To equal success, judging from your description). So in that regard, Harry Potter would be a UK Centered Phenomenom that spread overseas.
|
Mon May 08, 2006 12:12 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.
POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.
As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.
That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.
By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well.
What about Spider-Man 2?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon May 08, 2006 12:16 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.
POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.
As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.
That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.
By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well. What about Spider-Man 2?
National Treasure was like POTC. It didn't have a fanbase, so it had to build it's own. It had great legs, but that will only take you so far in the DVD era. The sequel will be huge.
Spider-Man had a minority that didn't like it, and didn't return.
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:14 am |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
In Australia, the only organisation that is boycotting DVC are the Anglicans. They've raised $50k AUD to combat the film. I don't know how.
But it's funny that Catholics are more open minded.
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:21 am |
|
 |
insomniacdude
I just lost the game
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 pm Posts: 5868
|
Good. Boycotting the film doesn't make sense. It's only giving power to the story (which is fictional). Boycotss create controversy, controversay creates awareness, awareness creates more moviegoers. 
_________________
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:34 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40248
|
Pirates had a minority that didn't like it and won't return too, my mom walked out of the theatre. Lots of seniors and stuff, that were turned away by the cannonballs and action, won't come back.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:41 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.
POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.
As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.
That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.
By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well. What about Spider-Man 2? National Treasure was like POTC. It didn't have a fanbase, so it had to build it's own. It had great legs, but that will only take you so far in the DVD era. The sequel will be huge. Spider-Man had a minority that didn't like it, and didn't return.
Um...I am sure some minority didn't like POTC as well...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon May 08, 2006 3:16 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Official running time is 2 hours and 28 minutes.
|
Mon May 08, 2006 6:08 am |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23250 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
I tell you now - this will fight to be the No.1 film of the summer.
Opening over $70m with a $300m finish
Alot of people here are underestimating it.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Mon May 08, 2006 7:04 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: DP07 wrote: I disagree on MR's legs. They were expectly what I was predicting before opening weekend when I expected great WOM. the problem for Reloaded was that it appealed mostly to males over 17. It had the R rating, and less then 40% of the audience was female, which limited the potential audience. Plus, it couldn't get people wanting comedy. 280m is about the best we could ever see given those circumstances.
POTC can't have a multiplier below 2.8 even with worse then expected WOM. I highly doubt that though given that everything is still in place.
As for Toy Story 2, it didn't have that many adults without their kids or teens, at least compared to the likes of Shrek 2. While it had a, extremely popular original film, it was not nearly as much as POTC 2.
That's the main thing: POTC is the movie that somehow got every demographic.
By that logic, National Treasure should have made $300+ million as well. It got all demographics as well. What about Spider-Man 2? National Treasure was like POTC. It didn't have a fanbase, so it had to build it's own. It had great legs, but that will only take you so far in the DVD era. The sequel will be huge. Spider-Man had a minority that didn't like it, and didn't return. Um...I am sure some minority didn't like POTC as well...
I think the difference between Spider-Man and POTC is that Spidey had a built-in fanbase, a huge one (given the record breaking opening), and couldn't really expand its audience that much more. POTC had to create its fanbase, and the enormous legs and DVD sales did so. So its fanbase is now bigger than Spidey's, I would argue. I don't see how Pirates 2 is going to make less than the original, since its fanbase has only gone up since then.
But we're really off topic... 
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:38 pm |
|
 |
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
MadGez wrote: Alot of people here are underestimating it.
The one problem I have with DVC is that I can't see it pulling in the kid/teen demo, which is really what would drive a big opening like this. Plus, I imagine a bunch of parents may get stuck dragging the little ones to Over The Hedge.
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:48 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
Rolling Thunder wrote: MadGez wrote: Alot of people here are underestimating it. The one problem I have with DVC is that I can't see it pulling in the kid/teen demo, which is really what would drive a big opening like this. Plus, I imagine a bunch of parents may get stuck dragging the little ones to Over The Hedge.
I'm positive teens would rather go to DVC than OTH. A lot of teens have read the book, and a lot enjoyed it. DVC is not just an 'adult' thriller. It's an adaptation of the biggest novel of our time. It'll be huge.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:51 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32578 Location: the last free city
|
It should do between $40-$50m.
OTH WILL beat it though.  $50 plus.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:51 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
revolutions wrote: It should do between $40-$50m. OTH WILL beat it though.  $50 plus.
Blasphemy. 
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon May 08, 2006 1:52 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 74 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|