Author |
Message |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
Christian wrote: Raffiki wrote: xiayun wrote: Raffiki wrote: How many nods did American Beauty have? 8. Hmmm... what else was nominated that year? Cider House Rules, Insider, Sixth Sense, Green Mile.
So, did any other film get more than 8 nods?
I don't remember anyone bringing up 1999 when we were saying its the lowest highest nods for a movie.
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:20 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Raffiki wrote: Christian wrote: Raffiki wrote: xiayun wrote: Raffiki wrote: How many nods did American Beauty have? 8. Hmmm... what else was nominated that year? Cider House Rules, Insider, Sixth Sense, Green Mile. So, did any other film get more than 8 nods? I don't remember anyone bringing up 1999 when we were saying its the lowest highest nods for a movie.
American Beauty was the only one with 8 nods, the most as well.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:24 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
xiayun wrote: Brokeback Mountain - 8 Crash - 6 Good Night, and Good Luck - 6 Memoirs of a Geisha - 6 Capote - 5 Munich - 5 Walk the Line - 5 The Constant Gardener - 4 Pride & Prejudice - 4 King Kong - 4 Cinderella Man - 3 War of the Worlds - 3 A History of Violence - 2 Hustle & Flow - 2 Syriana - 2
The noms were insanely spread out this year. 10 films with 4 or more nominations!
I'm incredibly happy to see The Constant Gardener and King Kong grab 4 each.
War of the Worlds even nabbed 3 noms, and got the spot in Visual Effects! Sweet.
Also glad to see Cinderella Man get 3 noms, although it would have been nice to see it get more.
Overall, this isn't really the greatest Oscar season for me. Crash gets 6 noms, bleh. But Walk the Line is shut out allowing Munich to get in, which is pretty damn cool.
PEACE, Mike.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:55 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
Further notes from me, heh:
I'm very disappointed that films like Batman Begins and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory got shafted in the technical categories, while Narnia walks away with four noms. Where the hell is Charlie's art direction nom? A huge snub there.
So, reading through the thread, has it been figured out yet whether Memoirs or Narnia has that confusion nom?
And lastly, I am super glad Munich could pull out the major nominations, because now hopefully it will receive a boost in audience attendance as well as theatre confidence. Hopefully Munich can ride well off of these noms and solidify a stronger total gross.
PEACE, Mike.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 3:59 pm |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Very surprised that Walk the Line didn't get a BP nom. It seemed like a lock. Nice to see Knightley get a BA nod. She deserved it. What's up with Howard getting a BA nod for a movie hardly anyone saw? Crash would have made more sense. On that note, nice to see Dillon get nominated and I think he'll win unless Gyllenhaal or possibly Clooney pull it out.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:17 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Joe wrote: Very surprised that Walk the Line didn't get a BP nom. It seemed like a lock. Nice to see Knightley get a BA nod. She deserved it. What's up with Howard getting a BA nod for a movie hardly anyone saw? Crash would have made more sense. On that note, nice to see Dillon get nominated and I think he'll win unless Gyllenhaal or possibly Clooney pull it out.
Giamatti?
Also, Hustle & Flow made over $20M, which is a good 20 times the amount of what Transamerica, another acting nominee, has made.
By the way, no one has answered my question. Why were there 3 songs nominated and not 5?
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:29 pm |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
Christian answered it somewhere...(or guessed, anyway)
Probably just didn't have 5 songs get the required score of 8.25 with the new voting system.
Him says: "I think not enough scored above an 8.25 (I guess only those 3 did), with the new bake-off point system that they had to use. No fewer than 3, no more than 5 nominees."
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:33 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
kypade wrote: Christian answered it somewhere...(or guessed, anyway)
Probably just didn't have 5 songs get the required score of 8.25 with the new voting system.
Him says: "I think not enough scored above an 8.25 (I guess only those 3 did), with the new bake-off point system that they had to use. No fewer than 3, no more than 5 nominees."
Oh, thanks to you and Christian (sorry didn't see yours earlier!)
That sounds kind of sketch, why has that never happened before?
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:39 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Libs wrote: kypade wrote: Christian answered it somewhere...(or guessed, anyway)
Probably just didn't have 5 songs get the required score of 8.25 with the new voting system.
Him says: "I think not enough scored above an 8.25 (I guess only those 3 did), with the new bake-off point system that they had to use. No fewer than 3, no more than 5 nominees." Oh, thanks to you and Christian (sorry didn't see yours earlier!) That sounds kind of sketch, why has that never happened before?
I assume because they just implemented this requirement/system.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:40 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
It's okay Libs, hehe.
Batman's cinematography nod is very well deserved, I actually thought it would be the ASC nominee that will get shafted. However, I would have liked to see the movie get an Art Direction nomination as most of the locations in the film are big soundstage set pieces (the bat cave, Ra's mansion, the narrows...)
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:57 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Christian wrote: In 1998 (1999 awards) I know Life is Beautiful and Thin Red Line got zero globe noms. Don't know if they're the most recent.
Yep, they are the most recent.
Okay nominations overall. I'm a little bitter about Narnia getting more nods that both Goblet of Fire and The New World combined, but oh well.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:40 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Narnia certainly didn't deserve its nods. But then...neither would Potter!
I didn't like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, but it's absence from the Art Direction category was crazy.
_________________ k
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:45 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
The first Harry Potter movie having more nods than Goblet is just...weird, not to mention crazy.
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:49 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
I have to say, I was underwhelmed with the new Potter movie in every single way. No, I take that back. I liked Ralph Fiennes.
_________________ k
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:51 pm |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod.
Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved.
I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod.
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:48 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Raffiki wrote: I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod. Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved. I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod.
Art Direction and Visual FX for KONG were more deserving than SITH???? That Lava Planet and Lightsaber fight around it had better FX in that 1 scene alone than KONG did throughout the whole movie..
And WALK THE LINE being snubbed for BEST PICTURE over BAREASS MOUNTAIN is a travesty to.. Perhaps if there were Gay sex involved in WALK THE LINE it would've been more of a contender..
Last edited by STEVE ROGERS on Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:38 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
SITH looks like a goddamn cartoon. Especially the lava and such and such.
_________________ k
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:41 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
yoshue wrote: SITH looks like a goddamn cartoon. Especially the lava and such and such.
And yet, SITH still managed to bring in nearly twice the amount of $$$ domestically as KONG did at it's paltry and underwhelming amount of $$$ at 212 Million.. 
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:42 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Which means what, exactly?
I wasn't crazy about King Kong either. But Kong himself was amazingly done.
_________________ k
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:52 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
BKB_The_Man wrote: Raffiki wrote: I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod. Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved. I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod. And WALK THE LINE being snubbed for BEST PICTURE over BAREASS MOUNTAIN is a travesty to.. Perhaps if there were Gay sex involved in WALK THE LINE it would've been more of a contender..  [/b] Uhh how about the other four movies that got nominated instead of Walk the Line. Not much gay sex in those movies.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:55 am |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
It may not have had the sex, but WTL was gayer than Brokeback Mountain 
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:15 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
POW!!!!!
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:03 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
BKB_The_Man wrote: Raffiki wrote: I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod. Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved. I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod. Art Direction and Visual FX for KONG were more deserving than SITH???? That Lava Planet and Lightsaber fight around it had better FX in that 1 scene alone than KONG did throughout the whole movie..
And WALK THE LINE being snubbed for BEST PICTURE over BAREASS MOUNTAIN is a travesty to.. Perhaps if there were Gay sex involved in WALK THE LINE it would've been more of a contender..
Crash=no gay sex
Munich=no gay sex
Good Night and Good Luck=no sex at all
Capote=a homosexual character but no sex at all
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 5:09 pm |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Libs wrote: Joe wrote: Very surprised that Walk the Line didn't get a BP nom. It seemed like a lock. Nice to see Knightley get a BA nod. She deserved it. What's up with Howard getting a BA nod for a movie hardly anyone saw? Crash would have made more sense. On that note, nice to see Dillon get nominated and I think he'll win unless Gyllenhaal or possibly Clooney pull it out. Giamatti? Also, Hustle & Flow made over $20M, which is a good 20 times the amount of what Transamerica, another acting nominee, has made. By the way, no one has answered my question. Why were there 3 songs nominated and not 5?
Forgot about Giamatti. If he wins it will be more because he was snubbed in the past, not because of his performance in CM. Also, Hustle and Flow may have made more than TransAmerica but the latter seems more like an "Oscar Worthy" film than the former. Hustle and Flow is like 8 Mile getting a nomination.
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 5:28 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
As far as snubs go, I think Charlie and the Chocolate Factory takes the cake.
Not only did it deserve a best pic nom, a best director nom and a best actor nom... But it was completely shafted on art direction, costumes, score and original song.
Seriously, the Charlie theme's the only piece of original scoring I can even remember this year.
Mwa-oo-wa-mwa-oo-wa-mwa-oo-wa-mwa-oo-mwa, mwa-oo-wa-mwa-oo-wa-mwa-oo-wa-mwa-oo-wa, doo-doo-da-de, de-de-dum, dum-de-de, dum-do-da...
|
Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:09 pm |
|
|