Author |
Message |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
andaroo wrote: lennier wrote: andaroo wrote: I have to say...
I was entertained all the way through. No sarcasm? You really liked it? ... surprising. Really. I thought it did its job. It isn't insanely memorable.
Unlike most people, I tend to agree with this. Very solid acting, a great look, and a sense of suspense really kept this one going. It was a hell of a ride - the "good" type of those check your brain at the door types. I think I gave it a B, which seems fair from what I remember.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:42 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
When I watched it again last night, I had just as much fun.
One thing that still bothers me about the plot is that if Jodie Foster never decided to move to the back of the planes with the empty rows, they would have never been able to get the daughter without someone noticing; especially Foster.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:43 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Yeah, I mean... it wasn't brilliant, but I would have had a fun night out at the movies with my friends had I gone to see this in a theater.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:44 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I prefered Red Eye to Flighgtplan quite a bit
Red Eye was logically flawed as well, but it never baffled me as much (in a negative way) as Flightplan did. You know why? It had a shorter running time, giving the audiences less time to rethink the plot and it was actually suspenseful throughout the entire flick (and had a great villain to boot).
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:44 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Flightplan would've been so much better if it didn't have that awful, awful, awful ending.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:45 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
And Foster looks like Michael Jackson in a few frames. That's distrubing.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:45 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I prefered Red Eye to Flighgtplan quite a bit
Red Eye was logically flawed as well, but it never baffled me as much (in a negative way) as Flightplan did. You know why? It had a shorter running time, giving the audiences less time to rethink the plot and it was actually suspenseful throughout the entire flick (and had a great villain to boot).
When I found out in Red Eye that the villian's name was Jack Rippner and all he wanted to do was... well this is not a spoiler forum for that movie... but when I found out the stuff there, I was turned off almost instantly. It disolves into a puddle of goo by the time they leave the plane.
I kind of liked the whole "I'M JODIE FOSTER AND I MIGHT BE A PSYCHO" aspect to the movie.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:47 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I preferred Red Eye to Flighgtplan quite a bit
Red Eye was logically flawed as well, but it never baffled me as much (in a negative way) as Flightplan did. You know why? It had a shorter running time, giving the audiences less time to rethink the plot and it was actually suspenseful throughout the entire flick (and had a great villain to boot).
On the contrary...
Red Eye was so cheap looking. Call me anal (boo lame), but I need a quality looking film- and Red Eye was not that. It was fun, sure, but I tend to favor the finer details when both plots are a bit ridiculous. I just couldn't go for it- the 5 dollar SFX budget, the annoying extras- it felt too silly. I like how Flightplan takes itself a bit more serious, too. It's got the edge that Red Eye doesn't have and really can't benefit on. The in your face tone to Red Eye is probably it's biggest fault, imo, because neither one of the actors seemed *that* great, unlike Jodie.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:48 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: I prefered Red Eye to Flighgtplan quite a bit
Red Eye was logically flawed as well, but it never baffled me as much (in a negative way) as Flightplan did. You know why? It had a shorter running time, giving the audiences less time to rethink the plot and it was actually suspenseful throughout the entire flick (and had a great villain to boot). When I found out in Red Eye that the villian's name was Jack Rippner and all he wanted to do was... well this is not a spoiler forum for that movie... but when I found out the stuff there, I was turned off almost instantly. I kind of liked the whole "I'M JODIE FOSTER AND I MIGHT BE A PSYCHO" aspect to the movie.
Well, it was pretty obvious that she was not a psycho all the time. If it wasn't for the ending, it would have been a very decent movie. Now it's only half-decent.
And as for Rippner...that might not even be his real name. The thing is that Red Eye is similar to Phone Booth (the latter is somewhat better). Both rather minimalistic and yet suspenseful.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:48 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Libs wrote: Flightplan would've been so much better if it didn't have that awful, awful, awful ending.
Which aspect, in particular? The senseless splosion?
I don't mind happy endings so long as they aren't super silly. Flightplan was OK, but the rest of the film makes up for it.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:49 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
I was so disappointed that I didn't bother writing anything about it. I gave it a D+ and the movie's legs just baffle me.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:50 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: And as for Rippner...that might not even be his real name. The thing is that Red Eye is similar to Phone Booth (the latter is somewhat better). Both rather minimalistic and yet suspenseful.
See you shouldn't have brought up Phone Booth... I hate almost every aspect about that movie.
Red Eye is great in it's first 20 minutes or so. I mean, it's REALLY good then.
Flightplan seems to "maintain altitude" (hahaha!) the entire time. I guess the ending didn't bother me that much, because...
1. There was that "OH SNAP!" moment at the end with the passengers.
2. She totally got to bitch slap the stewardess.
3. She got to blow up Sarsgaard, and sometimes people just need to blow up a little Sarsgaard.
The explosion should have, in fact, been bigger!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:52 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: And as for Rippner...that might not even be his real name. The thing is that Red Eye is similar to Phone Booth (the latter is somewhat better). Both rather minimalistic and yet suspenseful. See you shouldn't have brought up Phone Booth... I hate almost every aspect about that movie. Red Eye is great in it's first 20 minutes or so. I mean, it's REALLY good then. Flightplan seems to "maintain altitude" (hahaha!) the entire time. I guess the ending didn't bother me that much, because... 1. There was that "OH SNAP!" moment at the end with the passengers. 2. She totally got to bitch slap the stewardess. 3. She got to blow up Sarsgaard, and sometimes people just need to blow up a little Sarsgaard. The explosion should have, in fact, been bigger!
Okay, so what would be the letter grade (just so I know we are not arguing over it, even though we give it the same grade)?
And obviously if you don't like Phone Booth, you wouldn't like Red Eye either. Phone Booth made my Top 10 of 2003.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:59 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
I dunno... B-/C+, 3 stars out of five? Slightly better than mediocre.
Movies usually have to have something "special" to go above a B grade on my non-existant-sorta scale.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:02 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: I dunno... B-/C+, 3 stars out of five? Slightly better than mediocre.
Movies usually have to have something "special" to go above a B grade on my non-existant-sorta scale.
Mine's B-, so yeah...
Red Eye is B+.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:04 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Red Eye is C/C-
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:05 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Phone Booth is A-

_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:05 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
lennier wrote: Libs wrote: Flightplan would've been so much better if it didn't have that awful, awful, awful ending. Which aspect, in particular? The senseless splosion? I don't mind happy endings so long as they aren't super silly. Flightplan was OK, but the rest of the film makes up for it.
Everything.
The ridiculousness of Peter Sarsgaard hiding the child in some random compartment of the plane, as well as the insanely huge plot holes, made me want to scream.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:07 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
andaroo wrote: Red Eye is C/C-
Yeah well, I gave it an A- and Flightplan a C.
SO THERE.
Heh.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:07 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
andaroo wrote: Red Eye is C/C-
yup.
Phonebooth is a C+
I'm glad we're making progress. 
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:07 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hmmm, I am siding with Libs on this one, hehe.
I wonder what her grade fr Phone Booth is, but I'd imagine it's a good one too.
And as far as I can recall Zach's grade for Flightplan is a B- as well, so...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:09 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmmm, I am siding with Libs on this one, hehe.
I wonder what her grade fr Phone Booth is, but I'd imagine it's a good one too.
And as far as I can recall Zach's grade for Flightplan is a B- as well, so...
Yup. B/B-
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:12 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Phone Booth is D- btw.
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:20 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
And addr0ck is an F!
Take that!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:25 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
|
Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:27 pm |
|
|