Author |
Message |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
zach wrote: liberals are looking for any reason to bash bush. Can we leave it down to only, say 5000 threads at a time? youve ruined the fucking forum. Thanks.
Dude, cmon, there are alot of conservatives/republicans on this forum as well. Dont get your panties in a bunch.
_________________
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:31 pm |
|
 |
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am Posts: 4694 Location: Cambridge, England.
|
lovemerox wrote: zach wrote: liberals are looking for any reason to bash bush. Can we leave it down to only, say 5000 threads at a time? youve ruined the fucking forum. Thanks. Dude, cmon, there are alot of conservatives/republicans on this forum as well. Dont get your panties in a bunch.
yeah, stop your whining
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:34 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink: Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!
The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?
Dun dun dunnnnn...
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:46 pm |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink: Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush! The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead? Dun dun dunnnnn...
That is a question we all ask, yet our intelligent president doesn't seem to be able to answer that question.
Oh, I forgot it was the WMD's right? 
_________________
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:51 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Archie Gates wrote: Afghanistan was a failure, we went after Bin Laden and ended up as nation builders, we let him get away at Tora Bora due to inept planning and an obsession with switching to Iraq. 
Nobody let him get away at Tora Bora, and certainly not because of Iraq planning. You just have to realize that not everything the liberal establishment says is true. Sometimes it's better to find out the truth firsthand.
BY the way, we were going in to Afghanistan as nation-builders from the get-go. The goal was the overthrow of the Taliban.
Last edited by Anonymous on Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:54 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink: Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush! The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead? Dun dun dunnnnn...
Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right?
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:11 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink: Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush! The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead? Dun dun dunnnnn... Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right?
I know. I didn't say he sent all the troops to Iraq. By the way, do you know how many there are in Afghanistan compared to Iraq? Because I'm sure Iraq has a huge amount. Maybe if he concentrated on Afghanistan more, we might have found OBL by now.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:14 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink: Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush! The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead? Dun dun dunnnnn... Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right? I know. I didn't say he sent all the troops to Iraq. By the way, do you know how many there are in Afghanistan compared to Iraq? Because I'm sure Iraq has a huge amount. Maybe if he concentrated on Afghanistan more, we might have found OBL by now.
You know what the Chinese say? "It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room. Especially if it isn't there".
Osama is in Pakistan, not in Afghanistan.
And FYI, we have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan. There are more troops from the coalition.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:17 pm |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: Krem wrote: Zingaling wrote: You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink: Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush! The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead? Dun dun dunnnnn... Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right? I know. I didn't say he sent all the troops to Iraq. By the way, do you know how many there are in Afghanistan compared to Iraq? Because I'm sure Iraq has a huge amount. Maybe if he concentrated on Afghanistan more, we might have found OBL by now. You know what the Chinese say? "It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room. Especially if it isn't there". Osama is in Pakistan, not in Afghanistan. And FYI, we have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan. There are more troops from the coalition.
I thought it was closer to 13,000?
_________________
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:21 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
lovemerox wrote: I thought it was closer to 13,000?
Depends on the point of time. I think they increased the contingent for the elections.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:24 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
So, let me get this straight...
American Troops are located in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Osama Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan.
And, we're supposedly trying to find OBL.
Something is wrong here.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:47 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Zingaling wrote: So, let me get this straight...
American Troops are located in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Osama Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan.
And, we're supposedly trying to find OBL.
Something is wrong here.
Yes, let's invade Pakistan, which is our ally. Grand thinking.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:51 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
dp
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:51 pm |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Zingaling wrote: So, let me get this straight...
American Troops are located in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Osama Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan.
And, we're supposedly trying to find OBL.
Something is wrong here.
Zing ZIng, were looking for WMD'S remember?!!!
O wait...no were not...bc those don't exist. O I remember now, we are fighting terrorism in Iraq even though there are no ties. See, fighting terrorism means bombing and killing innocent Iraqi children.
Cmon zing, you know better!
bush knows what he is doin!! 
_________________
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:54 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
I don't think we should "invade" Pakistan. Like the people of Iraq, the people of Pakistan are innocent people, and they don't deserve to die just as much as the people of Iraq. No one deserves to die. But, Bush doesn't realize that. The man thinks nothing more than money and oil. Weapons of mass destruction? Yeah okay. We found out a long time ago that they're not there, so why are we still there? And why can't we just go search for OBL in Pakistan, if he's really there? Why must we kill people in Pakistan or Iraq or Afghanistan to get what we want? Why must we put our soldiers in jeopardy?
Because Bush says so.
|
Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:06 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Hey, I gots a great idea.
Let's talk about Furbies(tm)!
|
Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:08 am |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Not looking too good, Mr. President. Hopefully you do better this time!
Great Job. 4% [ 1 ]
Good Job. 14% [ 3 ]
Average Job. 9% [ 2 ]
Poor Job. 28% [ 6 ]
Horrible Job. 42% [ 9 ]
|
Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:13 am |
|
|