Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 2:53 pm



Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Rate George W Bush's FIRST TERM as US President. 

Rate the job that George W Bush did. What kind of job do you think he did.
Great Job. 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Good Job. 14%  14%  [ 3 ]
Average Job. 10%  10%  [ 2 ]
Poor Job. 29%  29%  [ 6 ]
Horrible Job. 43%  43%  [ 9 ]
I don't follow politics so I can't answer the question. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 21

 Rate George W Bush's FIRST TERM as US President. 
Author Message
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
zach wrote:
liberals are looking for any reason to bash bush. Can we leave it down to only, say 5000 threads at a time? youve ruined the fucking forum. Thanks.




Dude, cmon, there are alot of conservatives/republicans on this forum as well. Dont get your panties in a bunch.

_________________
Image


Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:31 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Cambridge, England.
Post 
lovemerox wrote:
zach wrote:
liberals are looking for any reason to bash bush. Can we leave it down to only, say 5000 threads at a time? youve ruined the fucking forum. Thanks.




Dude, cmon, there are alot of conservatives/republicans on this forum as well. Dont get your panties in a bunch.


yeah, stop your whining


Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:34 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink:

Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!


The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?

Dun dun dunnnnn...


Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:46 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink:

Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!


The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?

Dun dun dunnnnn...



That is a question we all ask, yet our intelligent president doesn't seem to be able to answer that question.


Oh, I forgot it was the WMD's right? :roll:

_________________
Image


Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:51 pm
Profile
Post 
Archie Gates wrote:
Afghanistan was a failure, we went after Bin Laden and ended up as nation builders, we let him get away at Tora Bora due to inept planning and an obsession with switching to Iraq.

Image


Nobody let him get away at Tora Bora, and certainly not because of Iraq planning. You just have to realize that not everything the liberal establishment says is true. Sometimes it's better to find out the truth firsthand.

BY the way, we were going in to Afghanistan as nation-builders from the get-go. The goal was the overthrow of the Taliban.


Last edited by Anonymous on Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:54 pm
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink:

Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!


The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?

Dun dun dunnnnn...

Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right?


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:11 pm
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink:

Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!


The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?

Dun dun dunnnnn...

Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right?


I know. I didn't say he sent all the troops to Iraq. By the way, do you know how many there are in Afghanistan compared to Iraq? Because I'm sure Iraq has a huge amount. Maybe if he concentrated on Afghanistan more, we might have found OBL by now.


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:14 pm
Profile
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink:

Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!


The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?

Dun dun dunnnnn...

Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right?


I know. I didn't say he sent all the troops to Iraq. By the way, do you know how many there are in Afghanistan compared to Iraq? Because I'm sure Iraq has a huge amount. Maybe if he concentrated on Afghanistan more, we might have found OBL by now.

You know what the Chinese say? "It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room. Especially if it isn't there".

Osama is in Pakistan, not in Afghanistan.

And FYI, we have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan. There are more troops from the coalition.


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:17 pm
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Krem wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
You can't blame the 9/11 attacks on Bush, but you can blame him for how he handled the situation. :wink:

Yes, what a horrible job he did by attacking Afghanistan. Damn Bush!


The question is why did he only stay there for like a few weeks and then sent the troops to Iraq instead?

Dun dun dunnnnn...

Umm, you do know there are still American troops in Afghanistan, right?


I know. I didn't say he sent all the troops to Iraq. By the way, do you know how many there are in Afghanistan compared to Iraq? Because I'm sure Iraq has a huge amount. Maybe if he concentrated on Afghanistan more, we might have found OBL by now.

You know what the Chinese say? "It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room. Especially if it isn't there".

Osama is in Pakistan, not in Afghanistan.

And FYI, we have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan. There are more troops from the coalition.




I thought it was closer to 13,000?

_________________
Image


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:21 pm
Profile
Post 
lovemerox wrote:

I thought it was closer to 13,000?

Depends on the point of time. I think they increased the contingent for the elections.


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:24 pm
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
So, let me get this straight...

American Troops are located in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Osama Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan.

And, we're supposedly trying to find OBL.

Something is wrong here.


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:47 pm
Profile
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
So, let me get this straight...

American Troops are located in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Osama Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan.

And, we're supposedly trying to find OBL.

Something is wrong here.

Yes, let's invade Pakistan, which is our ally. Grand thinking.


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:51 pm
Post 
dp


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:51 pm
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
So, let me get this straight...

American Troops are located in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Osama Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan.

And, we're supposedly trying to find OBL.

Something is wrong here.



Zing ZIng, were looking for WMD'S remember?!!! :roll:
O wait...no were not...bc those don't exist. O I remember now, we are fighting terrorism in Iraq even though there are no ties. See, fighting terrorism means bombing and killing innocent Iraqi children.

Cmon zing, you know better!
bush knows what he is doin!! :roll:

_________________
Image


Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:54 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
I don't think we should "invade" Pakistan. Like the people of Iraq, the people of Pakistan are innocent people, and they don't deserve to die just as much as the people of Iraq. No one deserves to die. But, Bush doesn't realize that. The man thinks nothing more than money and oil. Weapons of mass destruction? Yeah okay. We found out a long time ago that they're not there, so why are we still there? And why can't we just go search for OBL in Pakistan, if he's really there? Why must we kill people in Pakistan or Iraq or Afghanistan to get what we want? Why must we put our soldiers in jeopardy?

Because Bush says so.


Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:06 pm
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Hey, I gots a great idea.

Let's talk about Furbies(tm)!


Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:08 am
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
Post 
Not looking too good, Mr. President. Hopefully you do better this time!

Great Job. 4% [ 1 ]
Good Job. 14% [ 3 ]
Average Job. 9% [ 2 ]
Poor Job. 28% [ 6 ]
Horrible Job. 42% [ 9 ]


Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:13 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.