Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:16 am



Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 June 10-12th Predictions 
Author Message
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
trixster wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Am I missing something? Why do people think The Honeymooners will do $15 million? :-k

Well, it is a so-called 'urban' film, and those always do better than expected... inexplicably.
That being said, I think it'll do $9-13 million.


Right and out on DVD next week.. This movie should've never been conceived and is a throwaway.. How about we make "The Jeffersons" into a movie using a white cast?? :roll:


I still don't understand why the casting of this movie is such a big deal. It's not like The Honeymooners is race-specific or something. It could just as easily be African-Americans in the same sitcom-ish situations.


Exactly. And really, I can't think of anyone out there that seems like a better fit for Ralph Kramden then Cedric the Entertainer, he fits the role perfectly. Kudos to the casting department, even if the movie itself looks mediocre.


Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:04 pm
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
trixster wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Am I missing something? Why do people think The Honeymooners will do $15 million? :-k

Well, it is a so-called 'urban' film, and those always do better than expected... inexplicably.
That being said, I think it'll do $9-13 million.


Right and out on DVD next week.. This movie should've never been conceived and is a throwaway.. How about we make "The Jeffersons" into a movie using a white cast?? :roll:


I still don't understand why the casting of this movie is such a big deal. It's not like The Honeymooners is race-specific or something. It could just as easily be African-Americans in the same sitcom-ish situations.


Get a clue will ya.. If this was something to automatically go against the grain with me on cause you despise me or something then that's fine, but the facts are the facts and the fact IS, is that The Honeymooners is a Golden Age show that never should've been made and iof so, then the memory of the great Jackie Gleason should've been respected and not reduced to just another lame Urban movie.. Sorry Libs, but I think the majority of moviegoers and Baby Boomers who grew up watching this show would agree with me.. It is an insult to make this movie with an Urban Cast just like it would be to make "The Jefferson's into a movie using a white cast.. Stop with the politically correct garbage and see it for what it is and what I'm saying which is true..


Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:07 am
Profile WWW
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
BKB I thought of a good comparison, how would people react to a black I Love Lucy?

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:09 am
Profile WWW
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35223
Location: Minnesota
Post 
Daniel Raedts wrote:
Am I the only one who dares to predict 'Howl's Moving Castle'. Okay, I know it's only opening on 35 screens, but I think it will do extemely well. At least $ 1,0 million dollars opening weekend.


I had predicted it too.


And as for The Honeymooners, who cares if it's done again with an African American cast? Get over it people! I'd love to see gay versions of a lot of movies, like Dangerous Liasons and others. Because even though I can still enjoy movies with heterosexual characters, African Americans can still enjoy movies with a white cast, white people can enjoy movies with an African American cast, etc... it's still nice to see a movie that specifically pertains to you and you can possibly relate to.


Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:26 pm
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
1. Mr. and Mrs. Smith - 31.1
2. Madagascar - 17.7
3. Star Wars Episode III - 16.5
4. The Longest Yard - 14.0
5. Cinderella Man - 12.4
6. Shark-Boy and Lava Girl - 11.2
7. The Honeymooners - 8.9
8. The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants - 6.0
9. High Tension - 4.4
10. Monster-in-Law - 3.3


Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:44 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Weekend Warrior: http://www.comingsoon.net/weekendwarrior/2005/jun10.php


Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:15 pm
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
trixster wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Am I missing something? Why do people think The Honeymooners will do $15 million? :-k

Well, it is a so-called 'urban' film, and those always do better than expected... inexplicably.
That being said, I think it'll do $9-13 million.


Right and out on DVD next week.. This movie should've never been conceived and is a throwaway.. How about we make "The Jeffersons" into a movie using a white cast?? :roll:


I still don't understand why the casting of this movie is such a big deal. It's not like The Honeymooners is race-specific or something. It could just as easily be African-Americans in the same sitcom-ish situations.


Get a clue will ya.. If this was something to automatically go against the grain with me on cause you despise me or something then that's fine, but the facts are the facts and the fact IS, is that The Honeymooners is a Golden Age show that never should've been made and iof so, then the memory of the great Jackie Gleason should've been respected and not reduced to just another lame Urban movie.. Sorry Libs, but I think the majority of moviegoers and Baby Boomers who grew up watching this show would agree with me.. It is an insult to make this movie with an Urban Cast just like it would be to make "The Jefferson's into a movie using a white cast.. Stop with the politically correct garbage and see it for what it is and what I'm saying which is true..


I think the movie looks terrible and is completely unnecessary, I just don't see why people are getting *so* uptight about it. Goodness.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 3:27 pm
Profile
Hatchling
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 11:47 am
Posts: 11
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
trixster wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Am I missing something? Why do people think The Honeymooners will do $15 million? :-k

Well, it is a so-called 'urban' film, and those always do better than expected... inexplicably.
That being said, I think it'll do $9-13 million.


Right and out on DVD next week.. This movie should've never been conceived and is a throwaway.. How about we make "The Jeffersons" into a movie using a white cast?? :roll:


I still don't understand why the casting of this movie is such a big deal. It's not like The Honeymooners is race-specific or something. It could just as easily be African-Americans in the same sitcom-ish situations.


Get a clue will ya.. If this was something to automatically go against the grain with me on cause you despise me or something then that's fine, but the facts are the facts and the fact IS, is that The Honeymooners is a Golden Age show that never should've been made and iof so, then the memory of the great Jackie Gleason should've been respected and not reduced to just another lame Urban movie.. Sorry Libs, but I think the majority of moviegoers and Baby Boomers who grew up watching this show would agree with me.. It is an insult to make this movie with an Urban Cast just like it would be to make "The Jefferson's into a movie using a white cast.. Stop with the politically correct garbage and see it for what it is and what I'm saying which is true..


Been lurking around here for a little while, but I feel the need to respond here. "The Jeffersons" was a show ABOUT race. The whole premise of the show was built around race. A show about a white couple "movin' on up to the east side" wouldn't mean anything because that's what the east side was...white. The show was about race relations, (Note the mixed race neighbors, etc...). On the other hand, "The Honeymooners" was about a lower-middle class working man (a bus driver), living in the city (i.e., urban) and his everyday life. Race had nothing to do with it. If you can't see the difference, well I feel sorry you.

I can understand someone saying it is an insult that "The Honeymooners" is being remade at all. But that's not what you said. I'd venture a guess that there are a large number of inner city African-american bus drivers nowadays, so by making the movie in the modern day, it probably makes sense that Ralph be one. Either way, it shouldn't matter because the show had nothing to do with race. Gleason was a big, funny guy doing a comedy about a big city busdriver, his wife and their neigbors. Cedric is a big, funny guy doing a comedy about a big city busdriver, his wife and their neighbors. You can question the decison to make the movie. You can question the decison to stage it in modern day, but there is no reason to question the skin color of the leads.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:21 pm
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
TimTheEnchanter wrote:

Been lurking around here for a little while, but I feel the need to respond here. "The Jeffersons" was a show ABOUT race. The whole premise of the show was built around race. A show about a white couple "movin' on up to the east side" wouldn't mean anything because that's what the east side was...white. The show was about race relations, (Note the mixed race neighbors, etc...). On the other hand, "The Honeymooners" was about a lower-middle class working man (a bus driver), living in the city (i.e., urban) and his everyday life. Race had nothing to do with it. If you can't see the difference, well I feel sorry you.

I can understand someone saying it is an insult that "The Honeymooners" is being remade at all. But that's not what you said. I'd venture a guess that there are a large number of inner city African-american bus drivers nowadays, so by making the movie in the modern day, it probably makes sense that Ralph be one. Either way, it shouldn't matter because the show had nothing to do with race. Gleason was a big, funny guy doing a comedy about a big city busdriver, his wife and their neigbors. Cedric is a big, funny guy doing a comedy about a big city busdriver, his wife and their neighbors. You can question the decison to make the movie. You can question the decison to stage it in modern day, but there is no reason to question the skin color of the leads.


=D>

Way to put into words exactly my opinion on the whole thing.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:56 pm
Profile
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
For a better question for the Honeymooners remake:
Why did they remake it at all?

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:58 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
Impact wrote:
For a better question for the Honeymooners remake:
Why did they remake it at all?


Hollywood is a business! thay come up with ideas to make money!....its all about the MONEY

:smile:


Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:11 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Anyone notice that the commercials for High Tension have really picked up this week? I'm seeing it non-stop.

Still won't make more than $5 million, but just interesting...


Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:40 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Lee's Early Predictions:

1 Mr. and Mrs. Smith $24.288
2 Madagascar $16.313
3 Revenge of the Sith $15.353
4 Longest Yard $14.490
5 Cinderella Man $13.501
6 Shark Boy & Lava Girl $8.231
7 The Honeymooners $6.275
* High Tension $3.4

He is predicting one depressing weekend. I seriously doubt 4 openers will gross only 42M combined.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:56 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15530
Location: Everywhere
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Lee's Early Predictions:

1 Mr. and Mrs. Smith $24.288
2 Madagascar $16.313
3 Revenge of the Sith $15.353
4 Longest Yard $14.490
5 Cinderella Man $13.501
6 Shark Boy & Lava Girl $8.231
7 The Honeymooners $6.275
* High Tension $3.4

He is predicting one depressing weekend. I seriously doubt 4 openers will gross only 42M combined.


That would be an extremely poor weekend. At the height of the summer it tends to range from 60m-100m.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:04 pm
Profile ICQ
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Lee's Early Predictions:

1 Mr. and Mrs. Smith $24.288
2 Madagascar $16.313
3 Revenge of the Sith $15.353
4 Longest Yard $14.490
5 Cinderella Man $13.501
6 Shark Boy & Lava Girl $8.231
7 The Honeymooners $6.275
* High Tension $3.4

He is predicting one depressing weekend. I seriously doubt 4 openers will gross only 42M combined.


Lee is often awful at predicting, so...


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:24 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Libs wrote:
xiayun wrote:
Lee's Early Predictions:

1 Mr. and Mrs. Smith $24.288
2 Madagascar $16.313
3 Revenge of the Sith $15.353
4 Longest Yard $14.490
5 Cinderella Man $13.501
6 Shark Boy & Lava Girl $8.231
7 The Honeymooners $6.275
* High Tension $3.4

He is predicting one depressing weekend. I seriously doubt 4 openers will gross only 42M combined.


Lee is often awful at predicting, so...


Lee is usually conservative, exact opposite of BOP. I still like to read BOG and WW's articles the most.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:34 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Lots of low predictions for Shark Boy and Lava Girl. I'm starting to think it might not do that well.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:36 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Lots of low predictions for Shark Boy and Lava Girl. I'm starting to think it might not do that well.


Well...

It's only one theater in most locations. Also, I have yet to see a *single* advertisement.

In fact, I haven't seen a single ad for The Honeymooners, either. Odd.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:39 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Libs wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Lots of low predictions for Shark Boy and Lava Girl. I'm starting to think it might not do that well.


Well...

It's only one theater in most locations. Also, I have yet to see a *single* advertisement.

In fact, I haven't seen a single ad for The Honeymooners, either. Odd.


It's the opposite for me. I don't even watch the children's channels (Nick, Disney, etc.) and I still see non-stop ads for Shark Boy and Lava Girl. I've also seen a ton of The Honeymooners ads.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:41 pm
Profile
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
i havent seen any TV spots of Shark Boy and Lava Girl and Honeymooners

ive seen a lot more of High Tension than Smiths


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:42 pm
Profile
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
matatonio wrote:
i havent seen any TV spots of Shark Boy and Lava Girl and Honeymooners

ive seen a lot more of High Tension than Smiths


Mainly due to the fact that High Tension is really going to have to work for its audience. I'd be there Friday but 1) I ruined the ending for myself and 2) I won't have time... sad.

_________________
See above.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:46 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Least Honeymooners is getting great reviews.

Here's some quotes

"I’ve seen lots of horrible movies this year. I can’t imagine them getting any worse than this. "

"The Honeymooners is the worst film of this year."

"So...why remake this, again?"

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:18 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Libs wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Lots of low predictions for Shark Boy and Lava Girl. I'm starting to think it might not do that well.


Well...

It's only one theater in most locations. Also, I have yet to see a *single* advertisement.

In fact, I haven't seen a single ad for The Honeymooners, either. Odd.


It's the opposite for me. I don't even watch the children's channels (Nick, Disney, etc.) and I still see non-stop ads for Shark Boy and Lava Girl. I've also seen a ton of The Honeymooners ads.


Yeah, all four openers have actually been getting a LOT of tv spots, and I'm also already seeing tons for Batman Begins, War of the Worlds, and even some Land of the Dead. I really don't think Lion's Gate is doing a very good job with High Tension though. They're making it look like Ripley 5 more then a serial killer horror flick.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:34 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
BOG:

Mr. & Mrs. Smith - 37M
The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl in 3-D - 13M
The Honeymooners - 9M
High Tension - 6M

Madagascar - 18M
The Longest Yard - 15.5M
Revenge of the Sith - 13.5M
Cinderella Man - 12M


Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:16 am
Profile WWW
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35223
Location: Minnesota
Post 
TimTheEnchanter wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
trixster wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Am I missing something? Why do people think The Honeymooners will do $15 million? :-k

Well, it is a so-called 'urban' film, and those always do better than expected... inexplicably.
That being said, I think it'll do $9-13 million.


Right and out on DVD next week.. This movie should've never been conceived and is a throwaway.. How about we make "The Jeffersons" into a movie using a white cast?? :roll:


I still don't understand why the casting of this movie is such a big deal. It's not like The Honeymooners is race-specific or something. It could just as easily be African-Americans in the same sitcom-ish situations.


Get a clue will ya.. If this was something to automatically go against the grain with me on cause you despise me or something then that's fine, but the facts are the facts and the fact IS, is that The Honeymooners is a Golden Age show that never should've been made and iof so, then the memory of the great Jackie Gleason should've been respected and not reduced to just another lame Urban movie.. Sorry Libs, but I think the majority of moviegoers and Baby Boomers who grew up watching this show would agree with me.. It is an insult to make this movie with an Urban Cast just like it would be to make "The Jefferson's into a movie using a white cast.. Stop with the politically correct garbage and see it for what it is and what I'm saying which is true..


Been lurking around here for a little while, but I feel the need to respond here. "The Jeffersons" was a show ABOUT race. The whole premise of the show was built around race. A show about a white couple "movin' on up to the east side" wouldn't mean anything because that's what the east side was...white. The show was about race relations, (Note the mixed race neighbors, etc...). On the other hand, "The Honeymooners" was about a lower-middle class working man (a bus driver), living in the city (i.e., urban) and his everyday life. Race had nothing to do with it. If you can't see the difference, well I feel sorry you.

I can understand someone saying it is an insult that "The Honeymooners" is being remade at all. But that's not what you said. I'd venture a guess that there are a large number of inner city African-american bus drivers nowadays, so by making the movie in the modern day, it probably makes sense that Ralph be one. Either way, it shouldn't matter because the show had nothing to do with race. Gleason was a big, funny guy doing a comedy about a big city busdriver, his wife and their neigbors. Cedric is a big, funny guy doing a comedy about a big city busdriver, his wife and their neighbors. You can question the decison to make the movie. You can question the decison to stage it in modern day, but there is no reason to question the skin color of the leads.



Well said! =D>

And I bet if Gleason were alive he could care less about them doing an African-American remake of THE HONEYMOONERS so why should you or anyone else BKB?



As for TV spots for this weekend's new openers, I've seen a few for THE HONEYMOONERS, I think only two for SMITH, a ton for HIGH TENSION, and a shitload for SHARK BOY, which I've seen the most advertisements for.


Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:51 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.