Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:04 am



Reply to topic  [ 197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
 Contenders 2016 
Author Message
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Chippy wrote:
Loyal wrote:
Algren wrote:
I skimmed through lesson one. Already knew it. What's coming up in lesson two?


Check back in 12 months. We'll see if you're asking the same questions over and over again next season. :mer:


he will be, because how could we movie experts who have been following and researching films for 10+ years know anything of value


I don't know Algren as much as you guys do. Is it a shtick?


Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:50 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Contenders 2016
I might disagree a lot with Loyal on his approach, especially during this Oscar season, but he is right about that these things are as much subject to analysis and predictions as is box-office. It is about trends and stats and cultural and politics.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:03 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Loyal wrote:
Chippy wrote:
Loyal wrote:
Algren wrote:
I skimmed through lesson one. Already knew it. What's coming up in lesson two?


Check back in 12 months. We'll see if you're asking the same questions over and over again next season. :mer:


he will be, because how could we movie experts who have been following and researching films for 10+ years know anything of value


I don't know Algren as much as you guys do. Is it a shtick?


To a degree, yes. It's more not caring. Which is fine. But as most do online, it's inflated.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:28 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Dr. Lecter wrote:
I might disagree a lot with Loyal on his approach, especially during this Oscar season, but he is right about that these things are as much subject to analysis and predictions as is box-office. It is about trends and stats and cultural and politics.


That's the nicest thing you've ever said about me. :wub2:

It's rare but I still do get genuinely surprised by contenders. The Hurt Locker and Slumdog Millionaire are two recent examples for me because both films had complicated distribution/acquisition backgrounds. The Hurt Locker for example, premiered in the fall of 2008 and somehow carried over that enthusiasm for a full 12 months into the next year's Oscar race. And Slumdog Millionaire was this close to being a straight to DVD release.

But 99.99%, you can see these films coming from a mile away. "Wait a second, Spielberg is directing a WWII film about gay priests in an interracial relationship who are also Olympic rowers with cerebral palsy!? Oscahs for everybody!"


Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:28 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
I would love it if Hacksaw Ridge is a contender and gets people loving Mel again. It is about WW2 after all, but the thing it doesn't have is that Oscar-level acting performer (Sam Worthington, Vince Vaughn, Andrew Garfield, Hugo Weaving). Oh, and apart from Randall Wallace (Braveheart, Pearl Harbor, We Were Soldiers) it is written by TV writers. And I suspect that the Hollywood Jews won't allow it to be nominated for anything.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:29 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
That big Lee Daniels Richard Pryor biopic is coming out this year right? Eddie Murphy, Oprah, Kate Hudson, Taraji P. Henson. All previous Oscar nominees.

I'd pencil that in as a big possibility, especially if voters want to avoid a third year of #OscarsSoWhite


Fri Jan 15, 2016 6:20 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Add this to the list

'Birth of a Nation': The Slave-Revolt Movie That Will Have Sundance Talking

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/featur ... olt-857177


Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:43 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40487
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Whatever happened to Amy Adams Oscar winning Janis Joplin role?

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:05 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Contenders 2016
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-es ... sue-782876

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:56 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Manchester by the Sea is the first contender out of Sundance, especially for Casey Affleck.


Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:42 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Southside With You could get a lot of nominations to appease the blacks.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:36 am
Profile WWW
Gamaur's sex slave
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Post Re: Contenders 2016
One director and one actor spot already taken by these two guys:

Image

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:58 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Hanks looks great.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:10 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
I have doubt Hanks and Eastwood will be able to overcome the very basic nature of the story.

Even with Best Picture nominations, Eastwood couldn't crack Best Director with American Sniper and despite a strong performance, Hanks missed out on Best Actor for Captain Phillips.


Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:08 am
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Here we go

http://variety.com/2016/film/awards/bir ... 201688371/


Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:09 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Funny how Birth of a Nation is not in your original list, Mr. "I Know Every Nominee a Year Prior". ;)

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:14 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Algren wrote:
Funny how Birth of a Nation is not in your original list, Mr. "I Know Every Nominee a Year Prior". ;)


Loyal wrote:
I'm hard pressed to think of a single year that at least 75% of the contenders weren't known by January. This time last year the only major film I didn't see happening was Mad Max.


<Looks at Calendar>

The same wisdom applies to Jan 2016 as it applied to Jan 2015 and every January I can remember. Birth of a Nation falls under that annual Sundance darling. :huh:

So yeah, it's pretty much "I Know Every Nominee a Year Prior." Not sure I see the gotcha there.


Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:06 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
No gotcha.

I just find it funny that it's not in your opening post, Mr. Know It All. ;)

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:09 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Algren wrote:
No gotcha.

I just find it funny that it's not in your opening post, Mr. Know It All. ;)


I guess? I did add some films 2 weeks later, I would also add Birth of a Nation to the list, in addition to Fences which is now being rushed into production to hit by December.

The argument hasn't changed though, if anything Birth strengthens the idea that by January, the majority of contenders are known. Cannes and later Toronto, etc, will sometimes add an unknown film or two into the BP mix.

Again, I think this ties back to the idea that you don't really follow the award season (not a condemnation). I have to constantly remind myself that when I read your posts in this sub-forum. It gets a little difficult sometimes because there doesn't seem to be much preexisting knowledge on even the basics of award season, so it dampens the ability to have substantive discussions.


Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:19 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Technically since the Oscars haven't happened yet, Loyal still has a few weeks to edit the first post and still be correct regarding the "year prior" guideline.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:06 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
BIG EXPLANATION. :funny:

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Jan 30, 2016 7:07 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40487
Post Re: Contenders 2016
So Birth of a Nation is probably going to win then?

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:57 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
A lot can happen in a year. But it all depends on the blacks and whether they can keep the #PoorUs trend alive until next year's Oscars.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:47 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Magnus wrote:
lol birth of a nation ain't winning BP.


who knows at this stage, it could. It will depend on lot of factors. I think it will get a Best picture nod and probably several nominations.


Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:33 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68316
Post Re: Contenders 2016
Magnus wrote:
lol birth of a nation ain't winning BP.

And what is, Loyal mk.2?

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:36 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.