Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Maverikk wrote: Growing up as a fanboy of Universal monster movies, I enjoyed this when I saw it in theaters, but didn't love it like I wanted to. Over time, I've grown to like it much more. It's a guilty pleasure, although my original grade hasn't changed.
B
I am pretty sure the first time I read your grade it was a B+, hehe.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:30 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Maverikk wrote: Growing up as a fanboy of Universal monster movies, I enjoyed this when I saw it in theaters, but didn't love it like I wanted to. Over time, I've grown to like it much more. It's a guilty pleasure, although my original grade hasn't changed.
B I am pretty sure the first time I read your grade it was a B+, hehe.
Was it?  I wanted to give it that this time, but thought I gave it a B so I didn't.
|
Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:36 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
B+
Ohhh, I already see the flames coming to me. What can I say? I really got a kick out of this flick which I admit has more flaws than one could count on both hands, but at the same time manages to be one of the most entertaining romps last year. Some scenes were that unrealistic that I even laughed at them myself pretty hard. I mean how on earth was Kate Beckinsale supposed to catch that injection with one hand while swingin on a rope in the middle of a rainy night?! But I am used to drop my sense of realism when watching movies like this one. Moreover, I guess I have somewhat of a soft spot for monsters and creatures of all kind, so this one hit the bullseye for me.
Hugh Jackamn pretty much delivered the only good performance of the movie. Kate Beckinsale is wasted and Richard Roxburgh's over-the-top Dracula impersonation was just...weird? His brides were simply ridiculous and delivered the worst pieces of acting I have seen in a blockbuster in quite a while.
Other than that, I found the action hugely entertaining. The CGI could have been better...actually could have been much better considering the $150+ million budget, but there have been some good effects as well. The set design as well as the cinematography are superb in this one and I applaud this movie for not dragging at all despite a rather long-ish running time. It's a popcorn film at (almost) its best and at (definitely) its dumbest.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:48 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Van Helsing
This movie is so fucking bad - which is a shame, because it's a brilliant concept. What a waste.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:30 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
 Re: Van Helsing
Last year I spent a week living with a rural Panamanian family who LOVED this movie. I couldn't understand why until I watched it with them. All the completely over-the-top nonsense they just took as straight comedy. By laughing at how unbelievably melodramatic and ridiculous Van Helsing is, it became a fantastic experience.
Sadly, I don't think that there's any way to recreate the circumstances that made this into an enormously entertaining experience. I tried to show it again to some friends with that context in mind and we still had to turn it off.
|
Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:24 am |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Van Helsing
Van Helsing is sort of a guilty pleasure. I don't really like it all that much, but I usually watch it when I see it on TV.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:51 pm |
|
 |
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am Posts: 7041
|
 Re: Van Helsing
D
Yuk. I liked GI Joe but I wonder how Sommers even made it that far since Mummy, Mummy 2 and this are all horrible.
_________________ Calls Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2 Lorax over Despicable Me Men in Black 3 Under 100m Madagascar 3 Under 100m Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:46 am |
|
 |
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6331 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
 Re: Van Helsing
MovieDude wrote: Last year I spent a week living with a rural Panamanian family who LOVED this movie. I couldn't understand why until I watched it with them. All the completely over-the-top nonsense they just took as straight comedy. By laughing at how unbelievably melodramatic and ridiculous Van Helsing is, it became a fantastic experience.
Sadly, I don't think that there's any way to recreate the circumstances that made this into an enormously entertaining experience. I tried to show it again to some friends with that context in mind and we still had to turn it off. This happened to me with Alien vs. Predator 2.
_________________ .
|
Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:51 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
 Re:
Dr. Lecter wrote: B+
Ohhh, I already see the flames coming to me. What can I say? I really got a kick out of this flick which I admit has more flaws than one could count on both hands, but at the same time manages to be one of the most entertaining romps last year. Some scenes were that unrealistic that I even laughed at them myself pretty hard. I mean how on earth was Kate Beckinsale supposed to catch that injection with one hand while swingin on a rope in the middle of a rainy night?! But I am used to drop my sense of realism when watching movies like this one. Moreover, I guess I have somewhat of a soft spot for monsters and creatures of all kind, so this one hit the bullseye for me.
Hugh Jackamn pretty much delivered the only good performance of the movie. Kate Beckinsale is wasted and Richard Roxburgh's over-the-top Dracula impersonation was just...weird? His brides were simply ridiculous and delivered the worst pieces of acting I have seen in a blockbuster in quite a while.
Other than that, I found the action hugely entertaining. The CGI could have been better...actually could have been much better considering the $150+ million budget, but there have been some good effects as well. The set design as well as the cinematography are superb in this one and I applaud this movie for not dragging at all despite a rather long-ish running time. It's a popcorn film at (almost) its best and at (definitely) its dumbest. For better or worse, I agree. It's far from perfect, but I liked what I saw. Certainly dripped with untapped potential, but oh well. ***/****
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:14 am |
|
|