Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 5:45 pm



Reply to topic  [ 740 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 30  Next
 Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread - NEW POLL 

Pick the 10 BP nominees (updated)!
Up in the Air 10%  10%  [ 33 ]
Precious 10%  10%  [ 32 ]
The Lovely Bones 1%  1%  [ 2 ]
Nine 3%  3%  [ 9 ]
The Hurt Locker 10%  10%  [ 32 ]
Up 9%  9%  [ 29 ]
A Serious Man 6%  6%  [ 19 ]
An Education 7%  7%  [ 24 ]
Inglourious Basterds 10%  10%  [ 33 ]
Avatar 9%  9%  [ 30 ]
Invictus 7%  7%  [ 23 ]
(500) Days of Summer) 3%  3%  [ 11 ]
The Messenger 1%  1%  [ 4 ]
A Single Man 2%  2%  [ 8 ]
Bright Star 1%  1%  [ 2 ]
Star Trek 4%  4%  [ 14 ]
District 9 6%  6%  [ 19 ]
The Road 1%  1%  [ 2 ]
The Fantastic Mr. Fox 1%  1%  [ 4 ]
Michael Jackson's This Is It 1%  1%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 333

 Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread - NEW POLL 
Author Message
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
speaking of Shutter Island

Image


Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 2:23 pm
Posts: 1778
Location: Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Red x?

Is The Fighter the Aronofsky picture? Cuz I think he's making Robocop first.

_________________
Image


Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:11 pm
Profile WWW
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
My updated perdicts

The Human Factor
The Informant
The Lovely Bones
Nine
Shutter Island

It looks like State of Play should be a contender but it has too early a release I think to really get noticed.


Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:13 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
junio wrote:
Red x?


go for it

http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/Images/sto ... poster.jpg


Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
First genuine awards contender of the year?

http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/goodbyesolo

90 on Metacritic with three 100s, including a pristinely glowing one from Ebert (Calling the director the "new great American director"), and 100% on RT with 23 reviews so far. If it does well enough at the box office and Roadside handles it well, Original Screenplay could be possible, and Red West could always pull a Richard Jenkins/Richard Farnsworth.


Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:55 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Jon wrote:
First genuine awards contender of the year?

http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/goodbyesolo

90 on Metacritic with three 100s, including a pristinely glowing one from Ebert (Calling the director the "new great American director"), and 100% on RT with 23 reviews so far. If it does well enough at the box office and Roadside handles it well, Original Screenplay could be possible, and Red West could always pull a Richard Jenkins/Richard Farnsworth.


Seems much smaller than usual for this type of film to gain any traction. We'll see I guess.


Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:24 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Sounds like a great flick, though.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:29 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Definitely, I look forward to seeing it eventually.

I linked the Shutter Island poster a few posts up.

:grrr:

Cape Fear Meets The Ring.


Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Yeah, very creepy.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:53 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Not sure if even the mighty Scorsese can get a horror film nominated. I haven't read the novel but I continue to hear mixed things (some LOVE it, some not so much).


Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:00 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
What was the last director to follow up a BP winner with a BP nominee (Shine a Light doesn't count)? Eastwood missed it by a tiny bit.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:01 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote:
What was the last director to follow up a BP winner with a BP nominee (Shine a Light doesn't count)? Eastwood missed it by a tiny bit.


Coppola maybe?


Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:27 pm
Profile
 

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote:
What was the last director to follow up a BP winner with a BP nominee (Shine a Light doesn't count)? Eastwood missed it by a tiny bit.

because it was a documentary or what? I would think SAL would count.

_________________
Mr. R wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself.

Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.


Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:37 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Monsieur Marin wrote:

Now, a month or 2 later, that I know about a few of these movies a little more, I would go back and change up my votes some.


what would you change?


Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:30 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Monsieur Marin wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
What was the last director to follow up a BP winner with a BP nominee (Shine a Light doesn't count)? Eastwood missed it by a tiny bit.

because it was a documentary or what? I would think SAL would count.

When was the last time a Documentary was nominated for Best Picture?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:31 am
Profile WWW
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote:
What was the last director to follow up a BP winner with a BP nominee (Shine a Light doesn't count)? Eastwood missed it by a tiny bit.


James L. Brooks, with Broadcast News, though he was nominated himself. Woody Allen is the last director to follow up a BP winner with a Director nomination (Interiors), but then that wasn't nominated for Picture! So the last director to follow up a BP winner with BOTH nominations was actually William Friedkin (THe Exorcist). Coppola's Godfather followup as technically The Conversation, which missed a Director nomination.

But yeah, that little fact has kept me from predicting King Kong, Geisha, Flags of Our Fathers and In the Valley of Elah. I don't see that changing.


Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:16 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
It's Scorsese, though. I feel that the Academy and the moviegoers have started to warm up to him recently. I mean his last three films (not counting SAL again) got 26 Oscar noms and won 9 Oscars. The box-office of them kept increasing too with the average gross for the three being at $100+ million. (The Dearted was also one of the biggest WoM and DVD hits of its year).

DiCaprio starts to seem a bit overdue at this point too, so if he delivers the goods and can secure a Best Actor nom for himself, I think it'll propel the film to a BP nom as well. I also don' really see a gross of less than $60-70 million for it with the right marketing.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:33 am
Profile WWW
The Wall
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Yeah, but his last three films were Oscar baity as you could get. SI doesn't look Oscarish at all.


Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:39 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
be.redy wrote:
Yeah, but his last three films were Oscar baity as you could get. SI doesn't look Oscarish at all.


The Departed was, cast aside, anything but Oscar baity. You should go back and read the comments n it as that was what almost everyone was saying before it came out.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:49 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
The Departed for me was the complete opposite of Oscar bait. I'm not the biggest fan of the film or its win, but yeah, it was a popcorn film all the way, which made its Oscar win kinda cool


Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:52 am
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread


I think Taking Woodstock can be safely removed from contention. Same with Away We Go.

Amelia (Mira Nair) Life of Amelia Earhart. 2% [ 4 ]
Avatar (James Cameron) First Feature Film Since Titanic. 7% [ 13 ]
Away We Go (Sam Mendes) Comedy about relationships. 0% [ 0 ]
Broken Embraces (Pedro Almodovar) Penelope Cruz thriller. 2% [ 5 ]
Cheri (Stephen Frears) Drama set in 1920's Paris. 4% [ 8 ]
How Do You Know? (James L Brooks) Comedy. 0% [ 0 ]
Inglorious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino) WWII Drama 4% [ 8 ]
The Human Factor (Clint Eastwood) Nelson Mandela drama. 11% [ 20 ]
The Informant (Steven Soderbergh) A Beautiful Mindish Thriller. 2% [ 5 ]
The Fighter (Darren Aronofsky) First wrestling, now boxing. 1% [ 2 ]
The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson) Drama about heaven. 13% [ 22 ]
Nine (Rob Marshall) Adaptation of the hit Broadway musical. 11% [ 20 ]
Public Enemies (Michael Mann) John Dillinger vs the Feds. 9% [ 16 ]
A Serious Man (Coen Brothers) Comedy set in 1967. 1% [ 3 ]
Shutter Island (Martin Scorsese) Leo and Marty's 4th film. 13% [ 22 ]
State of Play (Kevin Macdonald) Based on hit BBC mini-series. 0% [ 1 ]
Taking Woodstock (Ang Lee) Comedy about 1969 music festival. 1% [ 3 ]
Tree of Life (Terence Malick) Brad Pitt drama set in the 1950s. 7% [ 13 ]
Up (Peter Docter) Pixar's latest. 1% [ 2 ]
Whatever Works (Woody Allen) Yearly effort. 0% [ 1 ]


Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:05 pm
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Avatar for the win.

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:58 pm
Profile WWW
The Wall
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote:
be.redy wrote:
Yeah, but his last three films were Oscar baity as you could get. SI doesn't look Oscarish at all.


The Departed was, cast aside, anything but Oscar baity. You should go back and read the comments n it as that was what almost everyone was saying before it came out.

But it was a remake of a highly acclaimed award winning Asian flick directed by none other than Scorsese who at the time has been touted as long overdue for an Oscar with an all star cast. It's like saying Nine is not an Oscar baity movie. It was in an Oscar genre too (crime thriller)... Which part of the movie didn't sound like bait? The plot? The original should've been enough for the doubtful to recognize The Departed as an Oscar bait.


Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:46 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
be.redy wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
be.redy wrote:
Yeah, but his last three films were Oscar baity as you could get. SI doesn't look Oscarish at all.


The Departed was, cast aside, anything but Oscar baity. You should go back and read the comments n it as that was what almost everyone was saying before it came out.

But it was a remake of a highly acclaimed award winning Asian flick directed by none other than Scorsese who at the time has been touted as long overdue for an Oscar with an all star cast. It's like saying Nine is not an Oscar baity movie. It was in an Oscar genre too (crime thriller)... Which part of the movie didn't sound like bait? The plot? The original should've been enough for the doubtful to recognize The Departed as an Oscar bait.


Nine and The Departed are world's apart. Which awards did the original Departed win?


Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:42 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2009 Contenders Discussion Thread
be.redy wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
be.redy wrote:
Yeah, but his last three films were Oscar baity as you could get. SI doesn't look Oscarish at all.


The Departed was, cast aside, anything but Oscar baity. You should go back and read the comments n it as that was what almost everyone was saying before it came out.

But it was a remake of a highly acclaimed award winning Asian flick directed by none other than Scorsese who at the time has been touted as long overdue for an Oscar with an all star cast. It's like saying Nine is not an Oscar baity movie. It was in an Oscar genre too (crime thriller)... Which part of the movie didn't sound like bait? The plot? The original should've been enough for the doubtful to recognize The Departed as an Oscar bait.


Pretty much every single person disagreed on that, diminishing The Dparted's Oscar chances all the way until Oscar night because it was anything, but Oscar bait. It was very bloody, it was fun, it had over 200 "fuck"'s in it. That was NO Oscar bait.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:45 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 740 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 30  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.