Author |
Message |
Samwise
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 8:30 am Posts: 551
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
I really enjoyed this from start to finish. I really dont mind DW animated films, they are nothing fantastic but i still find them enjoyable. But i thought this was a hell of a lot better than anything they have done since Shrek. Funny, entertaining, a real treat. Definitely one of the better films this summer so far.
A-
_________________ Signature
|
Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:33 pm |
|
 |
Grill
Forum General
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am Posts: 8684
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
found this to be ok/good but didn't have or missing the magic of other animated movies.
|
Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:49 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Inc
Veteran
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:50 am Posts: 3350
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
I kinda wanted Wall E to have the title but, first A of 2008 goes to KFP. Ya i'm shocked to, and I loathe Dreamworks. This movie had everything, comedy, action, amazing animation, great voice work, touching story. Seriously the action was better than Jumper's scenes, fuck man. Also it's surprisingly, hilarious. Jack Black was borrrrn to play Po. Loved this movie, and seeing it again next week. It's a week A, but it is an A.
|
Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:07 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Saw it again; just as funny, and I have less of a problem with its rather simple story. Simply too much fun.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:43 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Dreamworks animation really stepped it up, I'll grant them that. I've always found their CG pictures to be defined by visuals that I can only describe as ugly and unmemorable. Like, one step up from Jimmy Neutron ugly. But Kung Fu Panda looks absolutely stunning.
Too bad, then, that the movie itself is only passable. There are some laughs, notably the skadoosh, but the story is dreadfully bland and the supporting characters are so underused (Jolie had, what, 6 lines of dialogue?) they never registered. It frankly didn't feel like a complete film, so I'm surprised at the warm reception.
It wasn't terrible, but it also wasn't worth the trip to the theatre.
_________________ k
|
Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:43 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40586
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
I quite loved it. To say it's the best Dreamworks feature yet is an understatement, it's in a different league than their other films, in terms of visuals, heart, and actually, you know, telling a story. The fight on the bridge might just be one of the best CGI sequences I have seen, it's just flawless. I also appreciated that the whole "Po is fat and stupid" thing wasn't taken overboard, in lesser films they would've made him too much of a dumbass and would've gone too far with the running into things because he's uncoordinated jokes, but in here he felt like a real character and "person".
I do agree that the voice talents were underused though, at some point you have to wonder if there was any point to grabbing these celebrities other than for marketing. It's no surprise that the best supporting voice work comes from the unknown, Randall Duk Kim as Oogway. That was the one part of the film where I felt Dreamworks was reverting to their old selves, though it's not like it hurt the product any.
While I wouldn't say it's one of the funnier animations I've seen, I did enjoy the sight gags, again helped by Dreamworks actually trying to make it look good.
It's not the best CGI film I've seen, but it's in the conversation of top notch ones. In comparison to Pixar, I think it's at least as good as A Bug's Life and Monster's Inc., and better than Cars.
4/5
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:29 pm |
|
 |
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm Posts: 12333
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Wonderfully fun animated flick. The film is very smart with the laughs and the entire voice cast does great. Plus, the animation was great and I'm anticipating the sequel. Good job, Dreamworks.
A
|
Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:47 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Groucho wrote: Very enjoyable surprise. It lacks Pixar's character development and depth of story and concept, but hey, what nonPixar animated film does? I laughed a lot. B. Thank god. The "Pixar" film as it stands is starting to get boring. I'm glad there is a contrast out there.
|
Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:01 am |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
7/10 -> B-
A good movie.
The story itself is pretty thin and it can't hold 80 mintues worth of movie so the comedy scenes start to repeat in their idea, just with different execution. Which would be OK if every other time they'd top the previous execution but they don't do it. Thankfully the running time is pretty short so you actually never get bored, but as the movie gets closer to its end it's not funny anymore, it's just enjoyable.
I think it would be much better if they incorporated Secrets of the Furious Five into the movie. They could've easily kept the movie length and make it much more interesting because all of the supporting characters are completely underused.
The action is really good, the film is well made. It's just a bit bland.
|
Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:41 pm |
|
 |
Andrew
Lover of Bacon
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 7:05 pm Posts: 4197 Location: Sherwood Forest, UK
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
I could have sworn i'd posted something about this... I caught it on a flight recently which isn't the best place to judge a film, but it was actually pretty enjoyable. On a par with Over the Hedge, which pretty much puts it as DW's best. It surprised me in being a really fun way to pass the time. Thank god i wasn't flying the next day.... the film would have been Prince Caspian  I'll give it a solid B
_________________ ... and there's something about this city today, like all the colours conspired to overwhelm the grey...
|
Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:54 am |
|
 |
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6330 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
I enjoyed it very much, but it's not on Pixar level. The animation is pretty good, it's very entertaining and the action is swift, but it's still predictable, standard kids film.
A-
_________________ .
|
Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:51 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
be.redy wrote: The story itself is pretty thin and it can't hold 80 mintues worth of movie so the comedy scenes start to repeat in their idea, just with different execution. Which would be OK if every other time they'd top the previous execution but they don't do it. Thankfully the running time is pretty short so you actually never get bored, but as the movie gets closer to its end it's not funny anymore, it's just enjoyable.
I think it would be much better if they incorporated Secrets of the Furious Five into the movie. They could've easily kept the movie length and make it much more interesting because all of the supporting characters are completely underused.
The action is really good, the film is well made. It's just a bit bland. Excellent analysis of this film!
|
Wed Dec 24, 2008 5:37 am |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Don't start agreeing with me Bradley. The hell will freeze over. 
|
Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:07 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
be.redy wrote: Don't start agreeing with me Bradley. The hell will freeze over.  I must say, it pained me too, to see you right about something for a change, but what can I do - - I calls 'em as I see's 'em... 
|
Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:25 am |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
I felt something warm around my heart. Must be the Christmas spirit. That's the only possible explanation.
|
Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:23 am |
|
 |
FILMO
The Original
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am Posts: 9808 Location: Suisse
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Lovely and cool. 8/10
_________________Libs wrote: FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.
|
Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:38 pm |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Shack wrote: I quite loved it. To say it's the best Dreamworks feature yet is an understatement, it's in a different league than their other films, in terms of visuals, heart, and actually, you know, telling a story. The fight on the bridge might just be one of the best CGI sequences I have seen, it's just flawless. I also appreciated that the whole "Po is fat and stupid" thing wasn't taken overboard, in lesser films they would've made him too much of a dumbass and would've gone too far with the running into things because he's uncoordinated jokes, but in here he felt like a real character and "person".
I do agree that the voice talents were underused though, at some point you have to wonder if there was any point to grabbing these celebrities other than for marketing. It's no surprise that the best supporting voice work comes from the unknown, Randall Duk Kim as Oogway. That was the one part of the film where I felt Dreamworks was reverting to their old selves, though it's not like it hurt the product any.
While I wouldn't say it's one of the funnier animations I've seen, I did enjoy the sight gags, again helped by Dreamworks actually trying to make it look good.
It's not the best CGI film I've seen, but it's in the conversation of top notch ones. In comparison to Pixar, I think it's at least as good as A Bug's Life and Monster's Inc., and better than Cars.
4/5 What he said, word for word. It's the first film from Dreamworks Animation that Pixar probably wishes they could've got their hands on. It's easily their best film to date. ***½
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:50 am |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21591 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
This movie is fantastic. I watched it again on Saturday and it holds up very well. It is actually hilarious; if only DW could manage to be this clever all of the time. The story, animation, action, all top notch. This is easily DW's best movie after the first two Shreks.
A
|
Wed Jun 17, 2015 7:11 pm |
|
 |
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36949
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
A generic story executed perfectly without taking itself seriously and injecting lots of fun and laughter thanks to Jack Black's turn. The animation is wonderful and holds up very well to this day.
|
Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:21 am |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21591 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Kung Fu Panda
Kung Fu Panda is actually really funny and features Dreamworks best animation to date. The message is a bit cliched but the story is told with style and the action scenes were groundbreaking for their time.
|
Thu May 01, 2025 12:05 am |
|
|