| Author |
Message |
|
filmboy
Speed Racer
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:05 pm
Posts: 119
|
 Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Hancock WOM is pretty dam good. Yahoo movies rated has A B+ with over 1,200 reviews and Fandango still has a must go with over 1,200 reviews also.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:38 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) filmboy wrote: Hancock WOM is pretty dam good. Yahoo movies rated has A B+ with over 1,200 reviews and Fandango still has a must go with over 1,200 reviews also. Are you, by any chance, an employee of Sony? Just curious, because I've *only* seen you post things related to Hancock. 
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:40 pm |
|
|
|
Jiffy
Forum General
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Seeing most of the Top 12 have 20%+ drops makes me breathe easier for Wall-E.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:44 pm |
|
|
|
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm
Posts: 4110
Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) $6.8 million for Hancock is pretty damn good. Iron Man only started an hour later and did $3.5 million, just for comparison's sake.
But the rest of the drops aren't great.
_________________
This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Futureboy
Speed Racer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:18 pm
Posts: 139
Location: The Emerald City
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) LOL Libs!
Yep...solid # for HANCOCK - not really mindblowing. Have to see how it shakes out this weekend. Everyone says $200M is guaranteed, but I'm not quite ready to make that bet yet.
I agree with the posts about Will Smith being likeable enough, but this is getting a little annoying. There's a certain amount of cockiness that he has (saying that this will definitely be the biggest film of the year and all), that is now, let's say, less than charming. Sometimes, I think he needs a bit of a comeuppance.
An bit more of a dip for Wall-E, but I'm sure just an anamoly. WOM on this is stellar - second weekend drop should be among PIXAR's best.
Think WANTED will pass $100M this weekend???
_________________My dvd collection is getting insane: http://futureboy.dvdaf.com/owned?rc=1
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Futureboy wrote:
Think WANTED will pass $100M this weekend???
If it does, it'll be ahead of Mr&Mrs Smith!
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:58 pm |
|
|
|
Kitana
Full Fledged Member
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:43 am
Posts: 94
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) LadiesMan217 wrote: Will Smith is just so popular. This movie will crack 200 million but there is no way it will do 300 million.
If it does then Will Smith is a killer. He already is. And no way does it make 300. If it was well directed then yes, but now, no.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm
Posts: 4110
Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Even with great reception, $300 million wouldn't happen for Hancock. Dark Knight would stop it dead in its tracks (just like it's going to as it is).
_________________
This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:07 pm |
|
|
|
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) I doubt Hancock will do 250. Probably make 210-220. I think it will be very front loaded.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:07 pm |
|
|
|
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) it seems the WallE fan club are clinging onto anything.
another record just got shot down. maybe Up! will do better.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:36 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22210
Location: Places
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Magnus wrote: 115m 5-day I think is secured  How the hell do you see this? _________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:47 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Cant handle da truth wrote: Magnus wrote: 115m 5-day I think is secured How the hell do you see this? $20+ mil OD. $75-ish mil OW. The only problem is Thursday. Which could be $20 mil... which would make it to $115 mil. _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:50 pm |
|
|
|
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) I'm gonna say a $21m Wednesday and a $115-120m 5-day, but I really wouldn't be surprised if Hancock had a larger Tuesday-to-Wednesday % increase than TRF did; Hancock never marketed this, whereas TRF made that the focus of its marketing before its release...I mean, that really does have an influence. I asked kids I saw at class today if they saw Hancock last night, and they didn't know it was showing last night, but were all (or at least mostly) planning to see it when it opened.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:53 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22210
Location: Places
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) i forsee
22.5 wed
15.5 tuhr
20.0 fri
23.5 sat
18.9 sun
=99.5...
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:53 pm |
|
|
|
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Cant handle da truth wrote: i forsee
22.5 wed
15.5 tuhr
20.0 fri
23.5 sat
18.9 sun
=99.5... I really don't think it's possible for it to drop over 30% on July 4th, especially when the Tuesday sneaks slightly deflated the Wednesday gross. _________________Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Cambridge, England.
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) LadiesMan217 wrote: My friends who have watched it say that the first half is awesome. The second half is solid but becomes a little drama type film and the last half has lot of cool stuff but nothing makes any sense whatsoever. It feels like shitload was chopped in the last half.  My maths isnt great but surely theres something wrong here! _________________
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:41 pm |
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Bodrul wrote: LadiesMan217 wrote: My friends who have watched it say that the first half is awesome. The second half is solid but becomes a little drama type film and the last half has lot of cool stuff but nothing makes any sense whatsoever. It feels like shitload was chopped in the last half. My maths isnt great but surely theres something wrong here! Yup. The middle half seems to be missing.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:09 pm |
|
|
