Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m)
| Author |
Message |
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) $6.8 million is very high, I would think.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:33 pm |
|
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21895
Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) I had no idea this came out on Tuesday, This is pretty dam teriffic in my opinion.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:36 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22210
Location: Places
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Speevy wrote: Cant handle da truth wrote: Crowd reports here and at mojo. I think that the audience that woulda been out last night, the teenage young adult one, is its best sghot for good wom, and if the word "decent" is being use,d with that age group, it is gonna be horrible for anybody who expects a real movie. Stop making stuff up. I have yet to see an overly negative crowd report and crowd reports are useless for the most part anyway. They're way too biased. A B+ at Yahoo shows decent to good WOM for the movie so far. well well see...im going to sleep. talk later. _________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:37 pm |
|
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Well, it seems that WALL-E's opening week is heading towards $94m-95m, meaning that NEMO still holds the Pixar record ($97.454.140)...
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:42 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Right now, there really is no comparison for Wall-E.
It had a low Monday drop compared to most Pixar films, except Ratatouille. It's Tuesday drop isn't THAT bad... just a little worrisome. If it drops more than 10% tomorrow, then that may be bad. But Ratatouille's first Tuesday was July 3rd, which opens up it's nightly showings. So I expect Wall-E to drop less than 5% tomorrow, if at all.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:53 pm |
|
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11033
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m)  Oh well, another prediction bust made by me. I wonder what hancock will do in its first full day, maybe 25mill?
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:55 pm |
|
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Munk·E wrote: Right now, there really is no comparison for Wall-E.
It had a low Monday drop compared to most Pixar films, except Ratatouille. It's Tuesday drop isn't THAT bad... just a little worrisome. If it drops more than 10% tomorrow, then that may be bad. But Ratatouille's first Tuesday was July 3rd, which opens up it's nightly showings. So I expect Wall-E to drop less than 5% tomorrow, if at all. Well, I took FINDING NEMO's numbers from Independence Day Week 2003: $2,522,360 -41.1 % Monday $2,474,315 -1.9 % Tuesday $2,213,646 -10.5 % Wednesday $2,675,835 +20.9 % Thursday If from now on WALL-E behaves like NEMO (but WALL-E behaved worse than NEMO on Monday & Tuesday), the full week is headed towards $94m-$95m...
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:59 pm |
|
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) neo_wolf wrote: :tears:
I wonder what hancock will do in its first full day, maybe 25mill? TERMINATOR 3 did $4,035,405 in Tuesday previews five years ago (but I don't recall the start time, I think it was either 8pm or 10pm) and $12,435,320 full Wednesday...
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:01 pm |
|
|
|
Speevy
Veteran
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:12 am
Posts: 3139
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Transformers last year did 8.8 million in sneaks and 27.8 million or so it's first full day. So something around 21-22 million sounds about right.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:05 pm |
|
|
|
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 8202
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Will Smith is just so popular. This movie will crack 200 million but there is no way it will do 300 million.
If it does then Will Smith is a killer.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:06 pm |
|
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11033
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) mark66 wrote: neo_wolf wrote: :tears:
I wonder what hancock will do in its first full day, maybe 25mill? TERMINATOR 3 did $4,035,405 in Tuesday previews five years ago (but I don't recall the start time, I think it was either 8pm or 10pm) and $12,435,320 full Wednesday... Hopefully it does identical numbers. 
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:06 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22210
Location: Places
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Terminators were at 10 P.M.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:17 pm |
|
|
|
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 8202
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) My friends who have watched it say that the first half is awesome. The second half is solid but becomes a little drama type film and the last half has lot of cool stuff but nothing makes any sense whatsoever. It feels like shitload was chopped in the last half.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:22 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Terminator had far more upfront demand than Hancock will have.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:25 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Speevy wrote: Transformers last year did 8.8 million in sneaks and 27.8 million or so it's first full day. So something around 21-22 million sounds about right. Transformers's first full day is the day before July 4th, while it is two days before for Hancock, but the anticipation is lower too, so $21m sounds about right. _________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:30 pm |
|
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11033
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) The Dark Knight wrote: With 87.2, WALL-E sits right between
26 Antz $90,757,863
27 Open Season $85,105,259 Wall-E has made 79.8mill, lol, dont trust SBD total numbers, they always have it off.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:39 pm |
|
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11033
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Mojo:
Wall-e: $7,601,082
Hancock: $6,835,034
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:42 pm |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) lol, it's a joke to think $6.8m for Hancock is not good, excel. This is not some wild fanboy film that was going to get $8m+ from 7pm showings, this is incredibly good. And I've heard nothing but positive remarks from people I know who've seen it. Just because people on this site didn't like it (and, no offense, but often let their opinions reflect the audience reaction) doesn't mean that it's not getting at least decent word-of-mouth.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:45 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) BOM: 1 WALL-E $7,601,082 -14.7% $79,601,894 2 HANCOCK $6,835,034 New $6,835,034 3 WANTED $4,603,750 -27.9% $61,912,585 4 GET SMART $2,306,248 -20% $82,664,632 5 KUNG FU PANDA $1,585,558 -11.9% $182,662,882 6 THE INCREDIBLE HULK $1,039,225 -21.5% $118,221,560 7 THE LOVE GURU $603,981 -31.4% $26,707,084 8 INDIANA JONES & THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL $574,829 -21.7% $301,394,348 9 SEX AND THE CITY $552,401 -11.8% $141,349,068 10 THE HAPPENING $392,716 -28.5% $60,062,743 11 YOU DON'T MESS WITH THE ZOHAN $356,083 -26.8% $92,032,362 12 IRON MAN $244,176 -27.5% $309,760,401 http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?s ... -01&p=.htm
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:51 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22210
Location: Places
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) W/e, well see. Soe calulaion...
T3 did 4.4 in 2 hours; HANCOCK did 6.8 in 5.
T3 did 3 times that its opening day, but had a lot more upfront demand, but less time.
I expect about 3-3.2 times 6.8 for Hancock on Wednesday, or 20.4-21.7...very similar to superman returns and war of the worlds.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:52 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Since it got buried at the end of page 2: BOM: 1 WALL-E $7,601,082 -14.7% $79,601,894 2 HANCOCK $6,835,034 New $6,835,034 3 WANTED $4,603,750 -27.9% $61,912,585 4 GET SMART $2,306,248 -20% $82,664,632 5 KUNG FU PANDA $1,585,558 -11.9% $182,662,882 6 THE INCREDIBLE HULK $1,039,225 -21.5% $118,221,560 7 THE LOVE GURU $603,981 -31.4% $26,707,084 8 INDIANA JONES & THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL $574,829 -21.7% $301,394,348 9 SEX AND THE CITY $552,401 -11.8% $141,349,068 10 THE HAPPENING $392,716 -28.5% $60,062,743 11 YOU DON'T MESS WITH THE ZOHAN $356,083 -26.8% $92,032,362 12 IRON MAN $244,176 -27.5% $309,760,401 http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?s ... -01&p=.htm
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Libs wrote: BOM: 1 WALL-E $7,601,082 -14.7% $79,601,894 2 HANCOCK $6,835,034 New $6,835,034 3 WANTED $4,603,750 -27.9% $61,912,585 4 GET SMART $2,306,248 -20% $82,664,632 5 KUNG FU PANDA $1,585,558 -11.9% $182,662,882 6 THE INCREDIBLE HULK $1,039,225 -21.5% $118,221,560 7 THE LOVE GURU $603,981 -31.4% $26,707,084 8 INDIANA JONES & THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL $574,829 -21.7% $301,394,348 9 SEX AND THE CITY $552,401 -11.8% $141,349,068 10 THE HAPPENING $392,716 -28.5% $60,062,743 11 YOU DON'T MESS WITH THE ZOHAN $356,083 -26.8% $92,032,362 12 IRON MAN $244,176 -27.5% $309,760,401 http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?s ... -01&p=.htmAgain, I don't see any problem with Wall-E yet (although I certainly now breathe easier seeing the rest of the numbers). KFP didn't follow the family films from 2003 either. I simply don't think we could use the pattern from 5 years ago to try to match. The best comparison for Wall-E for this week is in fact KFP. And the fact that Wall-E isn't showing much additional frontloadedness than another animated film which is already in its fourth week and expected to have an excellent hold tells me it is doing pretty good. _________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:58 pm |
|
|
|
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) xiayun wrote: Libs wrote: BOM: 1 WALL-E $7,601,082 -14.7% $79,601,894 2 HANCOCK $6,835,034 New $6,835,034 3 WANTED $4,603,750 -27.9% $61,912,585 4 GET SMART $2,306,248 -20% $82,664,632 5 KUNG FU PANDA $1,585,558 -11.9% $182,662,882 6 THE INCREDIBLE HULK $1,039,225 -21.5% $118,221,560 7 THE LOVE GURU $603,981 -31.4% $26,707,084 8 INDIANA JONES & THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL $574,829 -21.7% $301,394,348 9 SEX AND THE CITY $552,401 -11.8% $141,349,068 10 THE HAPPENING $392,716 -28.5% $60,062,743 11 YOU DON'T MESS WITH THE ZOHAN $356,083 -26.8% $92,032,362 12 IRON MAN $244,176 -27.5% $309,760,401 http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?s ... -01&p=.htmAgain, I still don't see any problem with Wall-E yet. KFP didn't follow the family films from 2003 either. I simply don't think we could use the pattern from 5 years ago to try to match. The best comparison for Wall-E for this week is in fact KFP. And the fact that Wall-E isn't showing much additional frontloadedness than an animated film which is in its fourth week and expected to have an excellent hold tells me Wall-E is doing pretty good. You're so wise xiayun! 
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:00 pm |
|
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) Based on the 6.8 for tuesday the MTC tracking for Hancock seems a bit high, right?
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:16 pm |
|
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11619
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
Re: Tuesday Numbers (Hancock - $6.8m) I think more will be stated come this weekend.
_________________
|
| Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:33 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72943395/HERON_img_7.0.jpeg)