Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 1:00 pm



Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Failures of astronomical proportions: It's gonna be... 
Author Message
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post Failures of astronomical proportions: It's gonna be...
Mmmk, so every year, we get a rather large failure (or two, sometimes three), a film that looks like it has it in the bag but completely busts upon release.

Case in point: Alexander. I thought it was virtually guaranteed at least a director nom last year, and yeah...

And to a lesser extent, Closer. I think we all pretty much thought it also had it in the bag (around this time last year, at least), but other than the Porman/Owen attention it got, it never really went anywhere.

So what do you guys think has the potential this year to be a complete failure (of astronomical proportions, if you will)?


Last edited by Dkmuto on Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:09 pm
Profile WWW
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
Rent
The New World
Memoirs of a Geisha
Munich

To a lesser extent BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, which won't get terrible reviews, but won't be lighting the world on fire.

_________________
k


Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
For some reason, Colin Farrell currently seems to be box office poison, so The New World is a fair shot.


Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:09 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
What was the big bust of 2003? I would think Cold Mountain, but it did get a bunch of nods and the reviews were favorable.

It could be Memoirs of a Geisha or The New World. I'm thinking these might be too Oscar-baity for their own good. Like The Phantom of the Opera, where everything in the background is so overly elaborate that it ends up burying any intended substance.


Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:20 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
torrino wrote:
What was the big bust of 2003? I would think Cold Mountain, but it did get a bunch of nods and the reviews were favorable.



It also managed to make just under $100m, which is very good for a civl war movie.

I can't see The New World missing out if The Thin Red Line was nominated. Maybe I'm thick, but I just didn't get that movie. Mallick is very respected in Hollywood.

I think Memoirs Of A Geisha has the best possibility of crashing, even though I'm looking forward to it.


Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:05 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Atoddr wrote:

I think Memoirs Of A Geisha has the best possibility of crashing, even though I'm looking forward to it.


If the current trend with the reviews continues, I'm afraid you might be right.

Other than that...I suppose Jarhead was already that movie.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:40 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Atoddr wrote:

I think Memoirs Of A Geisha has the best possibility of crashing, even though I'm looking forward to it.


If the current trend with the reviews continues, I'm afraid you might be right.

Other than that...I suppose Jarhead was already that movie.


Yeah, Jarhead has to be considered a disappointment as it now only has a chance for a cinematography nom, nothing more. On top of that, it had rather poor legs at the box office and will Mendes' first film not to cross 100 million.


Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:18 am
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
BJs top 5:

Jarhead
The New World :roll: not surprising here, Ferrell is quickly turning into the most radioactively toxic actor around.
Munich :twisted: Speilberg is good but so highly over rated its nuts. :nutso:
Rent :sad: most unfortunate as was Jarhead
The Pruducors :| Though it looks good i have a hard time seeing this film breaking out in anyway.

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Last edited by BJ on Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:28 am, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:16 am
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Yeah, for me right now it's The New World and Geisha.

Though I couldn't have been anymore excited for Geisha. Can't wait for that.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:23 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Hmmmm, I'm pretty sure eeryone knows now which it is.

Seriously, some months ago I wouldn't have even considered it to fail that badly. I mean currently reviews are slightly worse than Phantom's.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:00 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
I'd like to use this moment to remind everyone of just how unbelievably bad Phantom was. So very, very bad :disgust:

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:06 am
Profile WWW
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
Yes. There is no way MEMIORS can match PHANTOM's badness pound-for-pound, Rex Reed recommendation or no Rex Reed recommendation.

Speaking of which, how right was I when I declared his rave MOAG review the harbinger of failure? Wow.

I was wrong on Brokeback Mountain, however.

_________________
k


Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:09 am
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Looks like Geisha is setting up to be a failure. The reviews thus far are brutal, especially for what was supposed to be a serious Oscar contender.


Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:43 am
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Yeah, Memoirs of a Geisha is definitely looking like the biggest loser to date (by the way, I've been saying for months now that this could easily dissapoint and get nearly shut out. Don't mean to brag but I just got to with this one, heh.) Jarhead ended up making a huge sum of money, so it's hard to list it as that much of a dissapointment, although thusfar I'd say it's the second biggest one.


Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:28 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Not exactly huge...It started off well, but ultimately will fail to even cross $65 million.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:31 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Not exactly huge...It started off well, but ultimately will fail to even cross $65 million.


Thanks for pointing that out, Lecter. Jarhead is not a success.


Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:46 am
Profile WWW
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
It's going to be the Producers. This had even higher expectations than Geisha, hugely popular Broadway play and tons of press for Lane and Broderick. Throw in Uma and Will Farrell and there was a lot riding on it.

Geisha, yes the review for Geisha are disappointing but frankly it is one of the few nominees that would help keep the top awards from being a whiteout. It adds some much needed cultural/racial diversity and it might get in with a boost from that angle, as the academy is very self conscious of it's image it seems.

As usual take this with a grain of salt, I'm not one of the guys here who examines excel tables of top 10 lists and analyzes RT ratings. ;)


Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:14 am
Profile WWW
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
I am also getting the impression that The Producers is dead in the Oscar water, although many are calling it a great time at the movies.

_________________
k


Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:16 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Hmmm, I doubt expectations were higher for The Producers than Geisha, heh.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:18 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.

Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?


Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:14 am
Profile
Extra on the Ordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm
Posts: 12821
Post 
yoshue wrote:
Rent
The New World
Memoirs of a Geisha
Munich

To a lesser extent BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, which won't get terrible reviews, but won't be lighting the world on fire.


:biggrin: :tongue: ;)

hehe it's up to 11 100s at metacritics, with 21 reviews in...which means more than half of the reviews give it a perfect score. for those who cant do math :P

_________________
Image

Best Actress 2008


Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:17 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.

Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?


$72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5.

As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:24 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.

Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?


$72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5.

As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain.


Yeah but so far it seems much closer to Good Night, and Good Luck/Capote for how big it's going to be, and even if it's somewhat larger then those two I don't think the reviews will be as good for either.


Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:37 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.

Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?


$72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5.

As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain.


Yeah but so far it seems much closer to Good Night, and Good Luck/Capote for how big it's going to be, and even if it's somewhat larger then those two I don't think the reviews will be as good for either.


I consider Good Night, and Good Luck close to a lock for a nom as this year's Sideways. It has a decent box-office, a big push behind it with Venice festival praise and Clooney. Capote's rave reviews are mostly resulting from Hoffman's performance, similar to Monster, just a bit better. Match Point's reviews don't just single out an aspect of the movie, they praise the entire movie. Also I think Academy memebers will be glad to see Allen back to form in the year he hit 70. While only two of his movies have ever been nominated for Best Picture, he has been nominated for Best Director six times. So he is usually one of those director's who fill the 5th spot without their movie becoming nominated. Also, the 13 nominated screenplays speak for themselves.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:42 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.

Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?


$72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5.

As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain.


Yeah but so far it seems much closer to Good Night, and Good Luck/Capote for how big it's going to be, and even if it's somewhat larger then those two I don't think the reviews will be as good for either.


I consider Good Night, and Good Luck close to a lock for a nom as this year's Sideways. It has a decent box-office, a big push behind it with Venice festival praise and Clooney. Capote's rave reviews are mostly resulting from Hoffman's performance, similar to Monster, just a bit better. Match Point's reviews don't just single out an aspect of the movie, they praise the entire movie. Also I think Academy memebers will be glad to see Allen back to form in the year he hit 70. While only two of his movies have ever been nominated for Best Picture, he has been nominated for Best Director six times. So he is usually one of those director's who fill the 5th spot without their movie becoming nominated. Also, the 13 nominated screenplays speak for themselves.


I agree in regards to Good Night, and Good Luck. If Match Point did somehow get a nomination, it would take that film's spot. It's true that Capote's reviews have praised Phillip Seymour Hoffman immensely, but there is not a single slightly negative review to be found on Metacritic in regards to the film, as most critics agree that it is flawless.


Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:09 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.