Failures of astronomical proportions: It's gonna be...
Author |
Message |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
 Failures of astronomical proportions: It's gonna be...
Mmmk, so every year, we get a rather large failure (or two, sometimes three), a film that looks like it has it in the bag but completely busts upon release.
Case in point: Alexander. I thought it was virtually guaranteed at least a director nom last year, and yeah...
And to a lesser extent, Closer. I think we all pretty much thought it also had it in the bag (around this time last year, at least), but other than the Porman/Owen attention it got, it never really went anywhere.
So what do you guys think has the potential this year to be a complete failure (of astronomical proportions, if you will)?
Last edited by Dkmuto on Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:09 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Rent
The New World
Memoirs of a Geisha
Munich
To a lesser extent BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, which won't get terrible reviews, but won't be lighting the world on fire.
_________________ k
|
Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:13 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
For some reason, Colin Farrell currently seems to be box office poison, so The New World is a fair shot.
|
Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:09 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
What was the big bust of 2003? I would think Cold Mountain, but it did get a bunch of nods and the reviews were favorable.
It could be Memoirs of a Geisha or The New World. I'm thinking these might be too Oscar-baity for their own good. Like The Phantom of the Opera, where everything in the background is so overly elaborate that it ends up burying any intended substance.
|
Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:20 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
torrino wrote: What was the big bust of 2003? I would think Cold Mountain, but it did get a bunch of nods and the reviews were favorable.
It also managed to make just under $100m, which is very good for a civl war movie.
I can't see The New World missing out if The Thin Red Line was nominated. Maybe I'm thick, but I just didn't get that movie. Mallick is very respected in Hollywood.
I think Memoirs Of A Geisha has the best possibility of crashing, even though I'm looking forward to it.
|
Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:05 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Atoddr wrote: I think Memoirs Of A Geisha has the best possibility of crashing, even though I'm looking forward to it.
If the current trend with the reviews continues, I'm afraid you might be right.
Other than that...I suppose Jarhead was already that movie.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:40 pm |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Atoddr wrote: I think Memoirs Of A Geisha has the best possibility of crashing, even though I'm looking forward to it.
If the current trend with the reviews continues, I'm afraid you might be right. Other than that...I suppose Jarhead was already that movie.
Yeah, Jarhead has to be considered a disappointment as it now only has a chance for a cinematography nom, nothing more. On top of that, it had rather poor legs at the box office and will Mendes' first film not to cross 100 million.
|
Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:18 am |
|
 |
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm Posts: 25035 Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
BJs top 5:
Jarhead
The New World  not surprising here, Ferrell is quickly turning into the most radioactively toxic actor around.
Munich  Speilberg is good but so highly over rated its nuts.
Rent  most unfortunate as was Jarhead
The Pruducors  Though it looks good i have a hard time seeing this film breaking out in anyway.
_________________The Force Awakens
Last edited by BJ on Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:16 am |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Yeah, for me right now it's The New World and Geisha.
Though I couldn't have been anymore excited for Geisha. Can't wait for that.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:23 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hmmmm, I'm pretty sure eeryone knows now which it is.
Seriously, some months ago I wouldn't have even considered it to fail that badly. I mean currently reviews are slightly worse than Phantom's.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:00 am |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
I'd like to use this moment to remind everyone of just how unbelievably bad Phantom was. So very, very bad 
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:06 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Yes. There is no way MEMIORS can match PHANTOM's badness pound-for-pound, Rex Reed recommendation or no Rex Reed recommendation.
Speaking of which, how right was I when I declared his rave MOAG review the harbinger of failure? Wow.
I was wrong on Brokeback Mountain, however.
_________________ k
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:09 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Looks like Geisha is setting up to be a failure. The reviews thus far are brutal, especially for what was supposed to be a serious Oscar contender.
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:43 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Yeah, Memoirs of a Geisha is definitely looking like the biggest loser to date (by the way, I've been saying for months now that this could easily dissapoint and get nearly shut out. Don't mean to brag but I just got to with this one, heh.) Jarhead ended up making a huge sum of money, so it's hard to list it as that much of a dissapointment, although thusfar I'd say it's the second biggest one.
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:28 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Not exactly huge...It started off well, but ultimately will fail to even cross $65 million.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:31 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Not exactly huge...It started off well, but ultimately will fail to even cross $65 million.
Thanks for pointing that out, Lecter. Jarhead is not a success.
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:46 am |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
It's going to be the Producers. This had even higher expectations than Geisha, hugely popular Broadway play and tons of press for Lane and Broderick. Throw in Uma and Will Farrell and there was a lot riding on it.
Geisha, yes the review for Geisha are disappointing but frankly it is one of the few nominees that would help keep the top awards from being a whiteout. It adds some much needed cultural/racial diversity and it might get in with a boost from that angle, as the academy is very self conscious of it's image it seems.
As usual take this with a grain of salt, I'm not one of the guys here who examines excel tables of top 10 lists and analyzes RT ratings. 
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:14 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
I am also getting the impression that The Producers is dead in the Oscar water, although many are calling it a great time at the movies.
_________________ k
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:16 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hmmm, I doubt expectations were higher for The Producers than Geisha, heh.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:18 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.
Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:14 am |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
yoshue wrote: Rent The New World Memoirs of a Geisha Munich
To a lesser extent BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, which won't get terrible reviews, but won't be lighting the world on fire.
hehe it's up to 11 100s at metacritics, with 21 reviews in...which means more than half of the reviews give it a perfect score. for those who cant do math 
_________________ Best Actress 2008
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:17 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
MovieDude wrote: As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.
Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million?
$72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5.
As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:24 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: MovieDude wrote: As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.
Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million? $72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5. As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain.
Yeah but so far it seems much closer to Good Night, and Good Luck/Capote for how big it's going to be, and even if it's somewhat larger then those two I don't think the reviews will be as good for either.
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:37 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
MovieDude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: MovieDude wrote: As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.
Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million? $72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5. As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain. Yeah but so far it seems much closer to Good Night, and Good Luck/Capote for how big it's going to be, and even if it's somewhat larger then those two I don't think the reviews will be as good for either.
I consider Good Night, and Good Luck close to a lock for a nom as this year's Sideways. It has a decent box-office, a big push behind it with Venice festival praise and Clooney. Capote's rave reviews are mostly resulting from Hoffman's performance, similar to Monster, just a bit better. Match Point's reviews don't just single out an aspect of the movie, they praise the entire movie. Also I think Academy memebers will be glad to see Allen back to form in the year he hit 70. While only two of his movies have ever been nominated for Best Picture, he has been nominated for Best Director six times. So he is usually one of those director's who fill the 5th spot without their movie becoming nominated. Also, the 13 nominated screenplays speak for themselves.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:42 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: MovieDude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: MovieDude wrote: As far as other movies that have yet to come out... I got a bad feeling about Match Point. It really just seems like way too little, too late. The reviews are very good but it just doesn't exactly stand out. And as said, The Producers doesn't seem to have much any chance of anything, although I still don't see exactly why some thought it did.
Woah, 65 million? Jesus, I wasn't paying attention, I thought it was going to finish around 75-80 million. What was the budget, 70 million? $72 million. It's just embarassing that Jarhead won't even manage a multiplier of 2.5. As for Match Point...I think the reviews are too good to be ignored. At least Allen should get a directing nod. I mean its reviews are generally better than Walk the Line's, Syriana's and not too far away from Brokeback Mountain. Yeah but so far it seems much closer to Good Night, and Good Luck/Capote for how big it's going to be, and even if it's somewhat larger then those two I don't think the reviews will be as good for either. I consider Good Night, and Good Luck close to a lock for a nom as this year's Sideways. It has a decent box-office, a big push behind it with Venice festival praise and Clooney. Capote's rave reviews are mostly resulting from Hoffman's performance, similar to Monster, just a bit better. Match Point's reviews don't just single out an aspect of the movie, they praise the entire movie. Also I think Academy memebers will be glad to see Allen back to form in the year he hit 70. While only two of his movies have ever been nominated for Best Picture, he has been nominated for Best Director six times. So he is usually one of those director's who fill the 5th spot without their movie becoming nominated. Also, the 13 nominated screenplays speak for themselves.
I agree in regards to Good Night, and Good Luck. If Match Point did somehow get a nomination, it would take that film's spot. It's true that Capote's reviews have praised Phillip Seymour Hoffman immensely, but there is not a single slightly negative review to be found on Metacritic in regards to the film, as most critics agree that it is flawless.
|
Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:09 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|