Author |
Message |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
Shack wrote: Well... Atonement will probably get up to 70 mil+ if it gets a BP nom, they'll milk it out Focus Features is hardly Miramax. The Weinsteins would have no problem positioning Atonement for an Oscar sweep. Focus can't do shit; they couldn't even get Scarlett Johansson an Oscar nomination for Lost in Translation. And they certainly don't know how to expand movies, as evident by: http://www.the-numbers.com/market/Distr ... atures.php
|
Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:58 pm |
|
 |
MovieGeek
Grill
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:38 pm Posts: 3682 Location: Here
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
Gloden Globes are stupid
There Will Be Blood didnt even get nominated.
CMON!!! AT LEAST THE SCORE!!!!
Daniel Day Lewis though!!!!
_________________ i'm back
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:13 am |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
MovieGeek wrote: Gloden Globes are stupid
There Will Be Blood didnt even get nominated.
It did.
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:28 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40599
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
I was just thinking, Atonement WAS the nomination leader, maybe that made a big difference. After all, Babel won Best Drama too. Among press it that might have made it the "frontrunner" and worthy of a win, I dunno.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:07 am |
|
 |
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm Posts: 25035 Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
Juno's 0/3 is unacceptable, the globes suck.
_________________The Force Awakens
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:02 am |
|
 |
Skyblade
Wall-E
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:07 am Posts: 883
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
Yeah, I think the Globes were just reactionary voting for the poncy European period pieces. They don't get American movies...man movies like No Country, There Will be Blood,Into the Wild and The Diving Bell and the (Raw, Dripping) Butterfly (Steak) .
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:25 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
We were all saved 3hrs of our lives
Globes are meaningless
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:03 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
Wow, holy shit. Some surprises at last!!
Atonement taking Best Picture (Drama) was a bit WTF?, but I'm glad it'll boost its chances. I really am starting to think that the big snubs of it in the guilds are the result of lacking screeners. All it needs now is to get a PGA nom and then it's truly back in the race.
No surprises as far as the acting winners go.
NCFOM taking Screenplay is quite good as well since competition was fierce, but the real huge winner of the night is The Diving Bell and the Butterfly which, IMO, would have definitely won Best Picture Drama had it been up for that.
My new rankings:
1. No Country for Old Men 2. There Will Be Blood 3. Into the Wild 4. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly 5. Juno 6. Atonement 7. Michael Clayton
... But really, the spots #4-#7 are almost interchangeable at this point.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:30 am |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
My current rankings:
1. No Country for Old Men 2. There Will Be Blood 3. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly 4. Into the Wild 5. Michael Clayton 6. Juno 7. Atonement 8. Sweeney Todd
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:39 am |
|
 |
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am Posts: 2913 Location: Portugal
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
I KNEW IT!!!! The shocker for me was Juno going home empty-handed.
_________________
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:22 am |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
I love that so many had the same reaction to Billy Bush's and that other woman's commentary last night. It was insane. I wanted to grab them through the tv and slap them both.
|
Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:21 pm |
|
 |
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm Posts: 4110 Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
The only good thing about the telecast was its short length.
And seriously, would it kill the people writing the preview material to actually know what they're talking about and refer to the people who are actually contenders to win rather than just the biggest stars? I'm guessing that at least a nice chunk of the viewership is up enough on the race to know that Charlie Wilson's War has very little chance of doing anything.
_________________ This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:47 am |
|
 |
MovieGeek
Grill
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:38 pm Posts: 3682 Location: Here
|
 Re: Golden Globes, Er News Conference Party Down Thread
Dkmuto wrote: MovieGeek wrote: Gloden Globes are stupid
There Will Be Blood didnt even get nominated.
It did. I know. I meant to say PTA. I was pissed
_________________ i'm back
|
Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:38 pm |
|
|