Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:17 am



Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 I didn't like Wallace & Gromit... 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Groucho wrote:
W&G was possibly my favorite film last year. Charming, funny, full of silly jokes and lots of movie cliche satires. I am surprised people don't like it. It was way better than Corpse Bride. CB looked better, but visuals are only part of a film -- story, acting, direction and so on is much more important.

Isn't it interesting, by the way, how with every studio rushing to make CGI films, that the three films nominated for an Oscar this year are all done with traditional animation techniques?


Hehe, well, not exactly "traditional".


Well, clay animation and other forms of stop-motion animation have been around as long as animation has (in other words, since film began). That certainly is more traditional than CGI, now, isn't it?

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:02 am
Profile WWW
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
andaroo wrote:
MG Casey wrote:
You have no heart.

That argument has already been abused by Crash and Brokeback Mountain supporters, thank you.

Yeah, I guess so. :biggrin:

You didn't like Gromit though? He sold the movie for me, along with the rabbit creature (not the were-rabbit).


Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:07 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Groucho wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Groucho wrote:
W&G was possibly my favorite film last year. Charming, funny, full of silly jokes and lots of movie cliche satires. I am surprised people don't like it. It was way better than Corpse Bride. CB looked better, but visuals are only part of a film -- story, acting, direction and so on is much more important.

Isn't it interesting, by the way, how with every studio rushing to make CGI films, that the three films nominated for an Oscar this year are all done with traditional animation techniques?


Hehe, well, not exactly "traditional".


Well, clay animation and other forms of stop-motion animation have been around as long as animation has (in other words, since film began). That certainly is more traditional than CGI, now, isn't it?


Nowadays, not anymore, hehe.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:35 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
andaroo wrote:
MG Casey wrote:
You have no heart.

That argument has already been abused by Crash and Brokeback Mountain supporters, thank you.

Yeah, I guess so. :biggrin:

You didn't like Gromit though? He sold the movie for me, along with the rabbit creature (not the were-rabbit).

It was nice for families and kids I guess. Didn't translate for me.

I don't get a lot of the adult-love for this thing.

It's not bad though... *shrug*


Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:46 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
Groucho wrote:
dolcevita wrote:
Corpse Bride gonna take home gold!


Don't forget -- Nick Park has never lost an Oscar.

He won for "Creature Comforts" (which beat out the first Wallace and Grommit short)

Then he won for the next two Wallace and Grommit shorts.

There was no feature film Oscar when "Chicken Run" came out but if there were, he may have won that too.

The people who vote on these things love him. Trust me, he will win.


Told ya!

(Heh! Mind you, I was wrong about a lot of other wins!)

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:40 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Having now seen all nominated animated films, my pick still goes to W&G. Easily.

I thought Howl's Moving Castle was quite bad, and I'm otherwise a big fan of Miyazaki.

If I'd had to nominate 3 last year, my spots would have gone to W&G, Corpse Bride, and probably Steamboy.

Ouch. Terrible year.


Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:54 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
Having now seen all nominated animated films, my pick still goes to W&G. Easily.

I thought Howl's Moving Castle was quite bad, and I'm otherwise a big fan of Miyazaki.

If I'd had to nominate 3 last year, my spots would have gone to W&G, Corpse Bride, and probably Steamboy.

Ouch. Terrible year.


That's because there was no Pixar release. But still, I really liked W&G

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:52 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.