I'm Now OFFICIALLY Predicting ROCKY BALBOA To BOMB..
Author |
Message |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11033
|
For Rocky 6 to bomb it needs to gross about 30mill total since that what it costed(including marketing), and this will def make more than 30mill, no way this bombs.
|
Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:16 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
neo_wolf wrote: For Rocky 6 to bomb it needs to gross about 30mill total since that what it costed(including marketing), and this will def make more than 30mill, no way this bombs.
Well, like I said, fanboys will use the 15-20 Million budget this cost to call it a definite hit right now, but when you consider what this franchise or each movie grossed back in the 80's?? If it doesn't at least match those movie's, then YES, it will be a box office bomb.. I'm sorry but spin it anyway you want.. These movie's made a fortune back then and compared to today, anything less than 100 Million domestically will be deemed disappointing.. That's just the way it is..
|
Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:18 am |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11033
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: anything less than 100 Million domestically will be deemed disappointing.. That's just the way it is..[/b]
You dont seem to know what the defenition of box office dissapointment/bomb means.If a movie that cost 15mill to make makes 50mill+ then thats a very good profit.
Ill tell you what, if this film grosses less than Rocky V then i will agree its a dissapointment, but that aint happening.
|
Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:30 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Interestingly enough, David Letterman stated on his show that he saw ROCKY BALBOA and said that it wasn't very exciting at all.. He said the basic plot breakdown was that ROCKY was designing a Hamburger Grill like George Forman and also stated that when Stallone was interviewed while making this movie, that he abstained from having sex to make this.. Letterman said quote: "Instead of abstaining from having sex while making this movie, how about actually having sex and abstaining from making anymore sequels"..MWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
|
Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:01 am |
|
 |
Kenspy
Into the fray
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:09 pm Posts: 1874
|
Sly was on Jim Rome's radio show and TV show today. Very good interviews; I expect this movie to do really well.
He basically said he was making this movie as atonement for the bad Rocky movies, that this would bring closure to the entire series. Sounded like he was really proud of it, and he said that Tarver was actually allowed to beat up on him (and knocked him down quite a few times).
I don't think it'll bomb. Should be $5m worth of business in Philly alone 
|
Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:12 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
I saw Letterman, BKB, you could be a Yellow Journalist. It was all in good fun and said it was actually very good. Stallone was on Leno and Leno raved.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:48 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Thegun wrote: I saw Letterman, BKB, you could be a Yellow Journalist. It was all in good fun and said it was actually very good. Stallone was on Leno and Leno raved.
Well of course he's gonna rave.. What?? You think he's gonna tell Stallone his movie is shi* in person, on LIVE TV while interviewing him??? Come on.. 
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:12 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Thats your best argument, stating the most obvious thing and thinking noone would know that.
Obviously he would rave about it, thats what Talk Shows are about, but the great clip, Sly and Jay having a very good interview, and audience loving the clip they showed seems to be a much better indicator.
My point was Letterman saw the move and gave it thumbs up, he was only joking.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:25 pm |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Thegun wrote: I saw Letterman, BKB, you could be a Yellow Journalist. It was all in good fun and said it was actually very good. Stallone was on Leno and Leno raved. Well of course he's gonna rave.. What?? You think he's gonna tell Stallone his movie is shi* in person, on LIVE TV while interviewing him??? Come on.. 
[font=century gothic]Leno has gone on to say after the interview that he enjoyed the film (On his show). Whether or not he is still whoring for the studio is up to you, but why not just believe him?
As for it being on Live TV - It's more along the lines of (At least for Jay) recording in front of a studio audience three hours before the show airs in the East. Not exactly "Live".[/font]
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:30 pm |
|
 |
Terminator1997
George A. Romero
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:30 pm Posts: 9773 Location: Enjoying a cold pint
|
BKB is really starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel to come up with reasons to bash this movie anymore.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:56 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Thegun wrote: Thats your best argument, stating the most obvious thing and thinking noone would know that.
Obviously he would rave about it, thats what Talk Shows are about, but the great clip, Sly and Jay having a very good interview, and audience loving the clip they showed seems to be a much better indicator.
My point was Letterman saw the move and gave it thumbs up, he was only joking.
Dumbass, they have what's called an "Applaud Meter", a sign that blinks to the audience to let them know when to applaud... Of course there gonna applaud.. How would it look if they showed the clip and you heard nothing but crickets in the audience and no one responded to it???
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 6:12 am |
|
 |
PresidentPalmer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 2:34 am Posts: 1956
|
BKB this is as dumb as a predcition as your Charlotte's web making over 40 million opening weekend prediction.
Last edited by PresidentPalmer on Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:10 am |
|
 |
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am Posts: 1011 Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
To bomb, Rocky Balboa needs under $30 million. Not happening. Remember, this thread is about the filming bombing, not disappointing or not becoming a $150 million grosser.
_________________
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:16 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
PresidentPalmer wrote: BKB this is as dumb as a predcition as your Charlotte's web making over 40 million opening weekend prediction.
I blame that on YOU.. The dumb teenage geeks that despite listening to reason here at this site that ERAGON was really bad, that you all enabled it to beat out a much better movie like Charlotte's Web.. You all make me want to punch a kitten for this stupidity.. Gee Mods?? Do we have an emoticon for that??
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:22 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Quint75 wrote: To bomb, Rocky Balboa needs under $30 million. Not happening. Remember, this thread is about the filming bombing, not disappointing or not becoming a $150 million grosser.
See?? To me, this movie could cost 2 Million to make and of course it will open higher than 2 Million and be deemed a HIT, but when you factor in how much this franchise made back in the day, back in the 80's at over a 100 Million a movie, this better at the very LEAST Come close to matching that, otherwise I have no other choice but to feel it will be a disappointment based on that..
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:25 am |
|
 |
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am Posts: 1011 Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Quint75 wrote: To bomb, Rocky Balboa needs under $30 million. Not happening. Remember, this thread is about the filming bombing, not disappointing or not becoming a $150 million grosser. See?? To me, this movie could cost 2 Million to make and of course it will open higher than 2 Million and be deemed a HIT, but when you factor in how much this franchise made back in the day, back in the 80's at over a 100 Million a movie, this better at the very LEAST Come close to matching that, otherwise I have no other choice but to feel it will be a disappointment based on that..
Disappointment, not bomb. I could side with you that the film would disappoint, but I'm not even sure what a disappointment would be considering that the film has pretty much been a joke up until very recently. Honestly, I'd call anything above $50 million a success for this film, considering what it has going against it.
_________________
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:29 am |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
People can officially hike their prediction to 40 million OW now since the tracking seems to go the opposite end of these types of BKB threads now
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:14 pm |
|
 |
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: I blame that on YOU.. The dumb teenage geeks that despite listening to reason here at this site that ERAGON was really bad, that you all enabled it to beat out a much better movie like Charlotte's Web.. You all make me want to punch a kitten for this stupidity.. Gee Mods?? Do we have an emoticon for that??
Says the one who raved about Alien vs Predator...
_________________
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:46 pm |
|
 |
turbozed
Child Actor
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:22 pm Posts: 39
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Thegun wrote: Thats your best argument, stating the most obvious thing and thinking noone would know that.
Obviously he would rave about it, thats what Talk Shows are about, but the great clip, Sly and Jay having a very good interview, and audience loving the clip they showed seems to be a much better indicator.
My point was Letterman saw the move and gave it thumbs up, he was only joking. Dumbass, they have what's called an "Applaud Meter", a sign that blinks to the audience to let them know when to applaud... Of course there gonna applaud.. How would it look if they showed the clip and you heard nothing but crickets in the audience and no one responded to it???
You're calling him a dumbass? That's not nice.
If he says that they were "loving it," then it's likely that they did more than politely applaud on cue. Unless there's a "show sincere approval" sign and the audience are somehow very cooperative, then you've stated something obvious that he already knows. Reading comprehension my friend...
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 6:17 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Thegun wrote: Thats your best argument, stating the most obvious thing and thinking noone would know that.
Obviously he would rave about it, thats what Talk Shows are about, but the great clip, Sly and Jay having a very good interview, and audience loving the clip they showed seems to be a much better indicator.
My point was Letterman saw the move and gave it thumbs up, he was only joking. Dumbass, they have what's called an "Applaud Meter", a sign that blinks to the audience to let them know when to applaud... Of course there gonna applaud.. How would it look if they showed the clip and you heard nothing but crickets in the audience and no one responded to it???
More insightful information from BKB, the studio expert. I've been in many different studio sets in my short life that Im not even going to argue with you.
On Conan last night, people were cheering during the clip, and than had a monsterous applause after another good interview. Meanwhile, they had a clip from Night at the Museum, and noone laughed during the clip, only applauded at the end, for the default reaction. Your just continually try and spin this films very positive buzz no matter what, and come the weekend you'll have very little left.
Oh and good job on Charlottes Web, you nailed that one,
Its coffin I mean. 
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:35 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Oh and BKB because your so well updated on studio methods, its "APPLAUSE METER" not Applaud. If your gonna try and be smart and talk about the business with me, at least know what your talking about.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:42 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Time to BUMP this up since 6.2 Million seems awfully low for a movie that was mega popular back in the 80's, but in the end, I'll be spoonfed the whole: "Well BKB, it cost 10 Million to make, therefore, it's a Hit" sort of shi*.. This certainly does not bode well for RAMBO 44 if and whenever Stallone makes this and the same thing will apply for DIE HARD WITH LAUGHTER..
|
Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:51 am |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Time to BUMP this up since 6.2 Million seems awfully low for a movie that was mega popular back in the 80's, but in the end, I'll be spoonfed the whole: "Well BKB, it cost 10 Million to make, therefore, it's a Hit" sort of shi*.. This certainly does not bode well for RAMBO 44 if and whenever Stallone makes this and the same thing will apply for DIE HARD WITH LAUGHTER..
Yeah I do agree that it definately doesnt bode so well for Live Free and Die Harder. Willis is pretty mcuh in the same boat as Stallone was 10 years ago where his career is fading. I really thought it would have done well since its pretty much the only Rocky since part 2 to have this much critical acclaim
Do you think it underwhelming affect had more to do with the franchise dying out or more to do with the actors age sort of like how T3 could have been argued on both ends of the deal? If it does have to do with audiences not buying a 50 year old action hero anymore, that doesnt sound too optimistic lnot just for Die Hard but Rush Hour and Indiana Jones
Last edited by El Maskado on Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:06 am |
|
 |
Ghostooze
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:47 pm Posts: 1406
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Time to BUMP this up since 6.2 Million seems awfully low for a movie that was mega popular back in the 80's, but in the end, I'll be spoonfed the whole: "Well BKB, it cost 10 Million to make, therefore, it's a Hit" sort of shi*.. This certainly does not bode well for RAMBO 44 if and whenever Stallone makes this and the same thing will apply for DIE HARD WITH LAUGHTER..
You're actually right. The expected opening, even with the Wed release, was around $20mil, give or take a couple mill.
Yeah, I really have no idea what happened...

|
Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:06 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
El_Masked_fuerte_grande wrote: CASINO_BKB wrote: Time to BUMP this up since 6.2 Million seems awfully low for a movie that was mega popular back in the 80's, but in the end, I'll be spoonfed the whole: "Well BKB, it cost 10 Million to make, therefore, it's a Hit" sort of shi*.. This certainly does not bode well for RAMBO 44 if and whenever Stallone makes this and the same thing will apply for DIE HARD WITH LAUGHTER.. Yeah I do agree that it definately doesnt bode so well for Live Free and Die Harder. Willis is pretty mcuh in the same boat as Stallone was 10 years ago where his career is fading. I really thought it would have done well since its pretty much the only Rocky since part 2 to have this much critical acclaim Do you think it underwhelming affect had more to do with the franchise dying out or more to do with the actors age sort of like how T3 could have been argued on both ends of the deal? If it does have to do with audiences not buying a 50 year old action hero anymore, that doesnt sound too optimistic lnot just for Die Hard but Rush Hour and Indiana Jones
It really does boil down to the fact that times have simply changed and both Stallone and Willis really are good actors, but it's time for them to take the next step in their career and stay behind the camera and make movies.. Stallone is a talented director and he has the chops to do it and I imagine Bruce Willis could also be just as talented in directing if he gave it a shot.. Problem is is that too many folks simply didn't buy into another ROCKY movie and still referred to it as ROCKY 6 when it wasn't in almost a mocking sort of way.. Even worse is if and whenever Lucas and Spielberg decide to do another Indiana Jones movie, that pople are really gonna give Harrsion Ford shi* cause he looks older than both Stallone and Willis combined and no one will buy into him as an action hero anymore.. Ford should do another Tom Clancy movie, a followup to Clear and Present Danger..
|
Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:17 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|