Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:08 am



Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 Friday Numbers 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
Post 
Dang. Mothers and children must really love Ice Age with that opening #. I never got the appeal of the original nor the need for this sequel though we all knew it was gonna happen. Second Rate Pixar films.

_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN

45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:29 pm
Profile
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35249
Location: Minnesota
Post 
headcrush wrote:
Dr Malcom wrote:
First of all, the Honeymooners was some horrible "remake" or something. Also, i deliberately left out Block Party as that is more of a stand-up special or something, like Eddie Murphy's Raw ($6,500 avg) or Martin Lawrence's Runteldat (10k avg).
You're right, all the other ones you mentioned did get "crappy" avgs in the 3k-4k range. So i have some that support my statements, and you have some that support your counter-argument. Why you feel the need to resort to "witty" comments i don't know, as i have been rather calm and never resorted to name calling or anything. Let's just agree to end this as it isn't going anywhere.


Block Party is 2/3 music. You have no support. You said all so-called urban movies do well. They do not. Have fun at Stormfront.


Just because you say "all" doesn't mean you literally mean all of them.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:31 pm
Profile
Post 
i just read your statements that i trashed ATL before seeing and that makes me a racist, sorry but no. I trash all kinds of movies without ever seeing them. Basic Instinct 2 looks like (and is) crap, so i must have something against middle aged women also, right? Okay, block party is 2/3 music, so? It is still in the same vein as the other stand-up movies, only he walks around and there's music.

I get your point that i attacked ATL without seeing it. My annoyance with the movie is the way it is marketed (ie as just another "urban drama") but that doesn't make me a racist. At worst, i am uninformed. Enough with your stormfront crap, can't you find a new "witty" comeback. You could tell me that i should wear a hood...that's white...cause i must be a white supremacist also, just because i don't like the constant stereotypical portrayal of black people in the marketing for these "urban" movies.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:31 pm
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
Mike wrote:
headcrush wrote:
Dr Malcom wrote:
Really? It will immediately show otherwise, then why did Brown Sugar, the Brothers, Baby Boy, the Wood, You Got Served, all have avgs in the 7k-9k area, and all finish with 25-40mil. That all falls into the range of what i said before, so where is the huge error? Also, what is your problem? I don't recall personally attacking you, so why have you targeted me or whatever?


I must be arguing with a middle schooler.

Dave Chappelle's Block Party, Hooneymooners, The Cookout, Roll Bounce, In the Mix, Something New, Breakin' All the Rules.


But MOST do well. And the ones you mentioned weren't of the gangsta sub-genre of urban movies, which is mostly what we're talking about.


They only hit gangsta movies of the last few years are Baby Boy (which was decent) and Hustle and Flow (which was good and actually underperformed).


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:33 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
As i said before, if you even bothered to read it, why don't we just stop with this now. I am not going to change my opinion, neither are you, so why don't we just back down mutually and be done with it. If you don't respond to our current argument then i will take that as an agreement to stop.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:36 pm
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
Dr Malcom wrote:
i just read your statements that i trashed ATL before seeing and that makes me a racist, sorry but no.


No, you said "It seems that ANY movie that is about black people automatically does really good, regardless of what it is." You are wrong.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:41 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
Alright, i see you don't want to stop arguing.
Yes, i said what you quoted. But you said this: "to trash a movie without seeing it just because it's a so-called urban movie (which is what he did) is racist. ATL has good reviews and he attacked it baselessly"
that is the "statements" that i was talking about.
Yes, i was wrong that ANY movie about black people automatically does well. A lot of them do, and a bunch of them don't. Why are we still arguing about this? I made a statement that wasn't 100% accurate, i admit it wasn't accurate, so can we move on now?


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:46 pm
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
Dr Malcom wrote:
Alright, i see you don't want to stop arguing.
Yes, i said what you quoted. But you said this: "to trash a movie without seeing it just because it's a so-called urban movie (which is what he did) is racist. ATL has good reviews and he attacked it baselessly"
that is the "statements" that i was talking about.
Yes, i was wrong that ANY movie about black people automatically does well. A lot of them do, and a bunch of them don't. Why are we still arguing about this? I made a statement that wasn't 100% accurate, i admit it wasn't accurate, so can we move on now?


:nonono: No, i'd like to tease you a little more just for fun. "A lot of them do" which is something you could say about any type of movie. Thanks for that revelation.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:54 pm
Profile WWW
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post 
headcrush are you causing trouble like you did to me when i first came to BOM.

Dr, i think you need to word your sentences better next time. I can understand your point of view, but these 'urban' films have their own market the same way ICE AGE has frisked every mommy and daddy to keep seeing these below par kiddie flicks, aka kiddie porn.

BTW, I love your avartar. Go Clem!


Last edited by getluv on Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:04 pm
Profile
Some days I'm a super bitch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
Post 
Amazing for Ice Age: The Meltdown! It should make $70 million this weekend.

And ROFL at Basic Instinct 2. Those numbers alone probably kicked off Stone's midlife crisis.

Oh well, seems like a pretty solid weekend overall. For the first time in a while, it's nice to wake up and smell the BO!


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:05 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
It's pretty sad that you can't have fun any other way than to bother me and spam the board up with comment after comment of "argument" even though i'm not arguing with you about anything. I already agreed that my statement was too general and not 100% accurate, yet you are still going like i am sticking with my comments until my last breath.
I guess you just need to feel like a big man, which is pretty sad. You have to come to a box office forum to get some validation that you aren't a loser. What is must be like to know you in your personal life, i bet people around you knock around like a rubber ball, and then you come to WorldofKJ to get out all your frustrations as people here don't know you are pretty sad. Alright, i'm done now. You can keep on going (which you no doubtedly will), so have fun arguing with no one.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:08 pm
The Original
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am
Posts: 9808
Location: Suisse
Post 
It was clear that Ice Age would start big ...but that big..WOW.

And Basic Instinct 2................. :smile:


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:09 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
getluv wrote:
headcrush are you causing trouble like you did to me when i first came to BOM.


:lol: Yes, that was fun. You said some pretty silly stuff. Admit it.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:11 pm
Profile WWW
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
Dr Malcom wrote:
It's pretty sad that you can't have fun any other way than to bother me and spam the board up with comment after comment of "argument" even though i'm not arguing with you about anything. I already agreed that my statement was too general and not 100% accurate, yet you are still going like i am sticking with my comments until my last breath.
I guess you just need to feel like a big man, which is pretty sad. You have to come to a box office forum to get some validation that you aren't a loser. What is must be like to know you in your personal life, i bet people around you knock around like a rubber ball, and then you come to WorldofKJ to get out all your frustrations as people here don't know you are pretty sad. Alright, i'm done now. You can keep on going (which you no doubtedly will), so have fun arguing with no one.


If you aren't arguing with me, then stop responding. Seems you can't do it. :happy:


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:18 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
I agree with Dr. Malcolm and Mike. ATL is garbage yet it does well just because those who see it will see anything apparently. [/b]Slither is 10 times the film ATL[b] is (It actually shows some semblance of creativity, for one) yet it makes far less. If it had been marketed as an urban horror movie with an all black cast it probably would have done well.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:24 pm
Profile
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post 
headcrush wrote:
getluv wrote:
headcrush are you causing trouble like you did to me when i first came to BOM.


:lol: Yes, that was fun. You said some pretty silly stuff. Admit it.



Is that an April Fool's joke?


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:24 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
Joe wrote:
I agree with Dr. Malcolm and Mike. ATL is garbage yet it does well just because those who see it will see anything apparently.


The film got good reviews. Perhaps Slither is garbage.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:27 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
headcrush wrote:
Joe wrote:
I agree with Dr. Malcolm and Mike. ATL is garbage yet it does well just because those who see it will see anything apparently.


The film got good reviews. Perhaps Slither is garbage.


I saw ATL and it didn't deserve the reviews it received.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:29 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 216
Post 
Joe wrote:
headcrush wrote:
Joe wrote:
I agree with Dr. Malcolm and Mike. ATL is garbage yet it does well just because those who see it will see anything apparently.


The film got good reviews. Perhaps Slither is garbage.


I saw ATL and it didn't deserve the reviews it received.


Neither does Slither. Ripoff of Night Of The Creeps.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:33 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
headcrush wrote:
Joe wrote:
headcrush wrote:
Joe wrote:
I agree with Dr. Malcolm and Mike. ATL is garbage yet it does well just because those who see it will see anything apparently.


The film got good reviews. Perhaps Slither is garbage.


I saw ATL and it didn't deserve the reviews it received.


Neither does Slither. Ripoff of Night Of The Creeps.


So you say.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:34 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post 
Joe wrote:
headcrush wrote:
Joe wrote:
headcrush wrote:
Joe wrote:
I agree with Dr. Malcolm and Mike. ATL is garbage yet it does well just because those who see it will see anything apparently.


The film got good reviews. Perhaps Slither is garbage.


I saw ATL and it didn't deserve the reviews it received.


Neither does Slither. Ripoff of Night Of The Creeps.


So you say.


Well from the trailers, first thing I thought of was Night of the Creeps. Slugs from outerspace which turn people into zombies. It is what it looks like. Now the storyline might be different but the trailers made it look that way. The funny thing was Night of the creeps was a failure at the box office as well, and became a cult hit on video and cable.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:39 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
BOM #'s are up! there somewhat different

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:39 pm
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
I just took my niece and nephew to see Ice Age (hey, you have to spend time with them when you can, even when they want to go to a movie). 10:30 showing, was packed. Hmmmm...


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:41 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40604
Post 
The Shaggy Dog... :nonono:

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:43 pm
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
matatonio wrote:
BOM #'s are up! there somewhat different

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/


Makes more sense for Inside Man and V IMO.


Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:48 pm
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Flava'd vs The World and 121 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.