| Author |
Message |
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Warner Bros. sure crowded a lot of its summer films close together: Hot Pursuit, Mad Max, San Andreas, Entourage.
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 11:03 am |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Magnus wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: But at the same time, TDAT's opening adjusts to almost $90 million, 2012 to $70 million - without 3D. Did The Rock help? Sure. Did he help more than an additional $5-7 million? Not so sure. as i stated, TDAT had a lot of other factors going for it. Global warming controversy, bigger scale/better money shots (the frozen NYC shot alone is a significant bigger selling point than anyting in San Andreas), and a Memorial Day weekend. Also, if you're admitting that The Rock helped 7m on OW, that by itself is admitting he is a pretty big draw. There are very few (if any) people who have the draw that Will Smith had years back or Cruise had in his peak. I think The Rock helped more than 7m but even if we were to just say it was "only" 7m added, that's big enough these days to say hes a legit draw. I never claimed he was not a draw. But claiming that San Andreas' success is mostly his achievement is not true. If he was a major draw, Hercules, Pain and Gain and Snitch would have done better. Admittedly, they would have done worse without him, but he is still not a really big draw. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 11:07 am |
|
|
|
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) People always watch disaster movies a lot.
Look at WWZ, TDAT and 2012. As big they were in theaters I imagine more people watched them as they are always on TV.
Imagine same for SA.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 11:30 am |
|
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21526
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Dr. Lecter wrote: Excel wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012? No but at the point in time the genre was the star. The straight up disaster concept isn't that big of a sell any more. But how do we know that? San Andreas is the first large-scale film of its kind since then. Pompeii and Into the Storm are the only ones comparable and they were just way smaller in their presentation. You forget Battle:LA and White House Down.
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 5:16 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Not natural disaster movies. In particular White House Down is not comparable to it at all.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 5:18 pm |
|
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21526
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Dr. Lecter wrote: Not natural disaster movies. In particular White House Down is not comparable to it at all. Do audiences really care about whether disaster is natural?
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 5:20 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) zwackerm wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Not natural disaster movies. In particular White House Down is not comparable to it at all. Do audiences really care about whether disaster is natural? Different kind of audiences, different kind of appeal. And what disaster happens in Wite House Down? Why not take Olympus Has Fallen or even Die Hard for comparison then?! _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 5:21 pm |
|
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) To a certain degree, yes. Films such as 2012 and San Andreas play on a, "It could happen to you, and how would you and your family survive?" dynamic. People are at once afraid of and in love with speculative apocalypse scenarios. Terrorists invading the White House is much, much more specific. It is just an action-movie plot.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21526
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Dr. Lecter wrote: zwackerm wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Not natural disaster movies. In particular White House Down is not comparable to it at all. Do audiences really care about whether disaster is natural? Different kind of audiences, different kind of appeal. And what disaster happens in Wite House Down? Why not take Olympus Has Fallen or even Die Hard for comparison then?! Roland Emmerich
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 6:01 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Friday Numbers (05/29) Why did you not name Anonymous for good measure?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sun May 31, 2015 8:48 pm |
|
|
