| Author |
Message |
|
thompsoncory
Rachel McAdams Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14605
Location: LA / NYC
|
=D> =D> =D>
Thank you Spiderman2005!
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:11 pm |
 
|
|
|
Kris K
Horror Hound
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:44 pm
Posts: 6228
|
LMAO someone just called a $36M opening for a movie which cost about $50M a bomb.
LMFAO, puhleese.
That means all the other movies released this year, apart from HITCH and ROBOTS are bombs.
Judging by your retarded views.
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
Spidey
Teenage Dream
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:13 pm
Posts: 10678
|
The opening is classified as a disappointment not a bomb for The Ring Two.
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:16 pm |
|
|
|
mary
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:35 am
Posts: 1255
|
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArtic ... ICE-DC.XML
"Ring Two," starring Naomi Watts and David Dorfman as a mother and her brooding son who are haunted by an evil entity and a mysterious unmarked videotape, pulled in $36 million in over the March 18-20 weekend, box office tracker Exhibitor Relations said on Sunday.
The new film, which opened in 3,332 theaters, fell slightly short of studio executives' expectations of around $40 million. But it handily surpassed the $15 million opening weekend of its predecessor, "The Ring," which bowed in 1,981 theaters in 2002. Final results will be available on Monday.
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:39 pm |
|
|
|
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Why is everyone callin Ring 2 a bomb????
Hello it made 36million opening weekend...which is pretty good for a horror movie, much less in march
Seriously...jsut because some predicted 60 and 70 million dosent make this a bomb...
_________________
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:09 pm |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
There's a fine line between Bomb and Disapointment.
Alexander is a bomb. The Ring Two is more of a disapointment, though only to the extremely high predictors.
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:11 pm |
|
|
|
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
|
Spiderman2005 wrote: jb007 wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: What's the big deal between The Ring Two and Regal? From What I know, due to gross sharing dispute with Dreamworks, Regal assigned only a few screens in its 550 theaters. That reduced the saturation limit for The Ring 2. If Regal only has 550 theaters, than the gross should have not been affected that much. But they also now own Edwards and all these other theaters that go far beyond those 550.
Anyways, I gotta say, I'm glad Hostage has actually been doing half decent. As is it'll easily pass 30 million, could very well even hit 35. 
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:16 pm |
|
|
|
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
|
MovieDude, the bold isn't showing on your sig because you left off the first bracket, but that's a pathetic display. You need to get rid of the anticipated movies list, and make the sig nothing but what you bet. Make those letters bigger too,and in color, like this...
"On This Day Forth, March 20th, 2005, BKB *OWNED* My Fanboy Ass , and proves The RING II Sucked , and The Amityville Horror WILL Prevail"
Don't forget to add your comma after the word ass and sucked. :razz:
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:26 pm |
|
|
|
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
|
Maverikk wrote: MovieDude, the bold isn't showing on your sig because you left off the first bracket, but that's a pathetic display. You need to get rid of the anticipated movies list, and make the sig nothing but what you bet. Make those letters bigger too,and in color, like this...
"On This Day Forth, March 20th, 2005, BKB *OWNED* My Fanboy Ass , and proves The RING II Sucked , and The Amityville Horror WILL Prevail"
Don't forget to add your comma after the word ass and sucked. :razz: Hey Mav, this ain't none of you business man. He told me to put it in bold, I'll change that, but me having this is enough, I'm not gonna walk around like the village pariah. :razz: He won, I admitted he did without any snide comments about White Noise or AVP or Hulk, and now I've got this. Besides, I'll get my revenge soon enough with The Amityville Horror, which I still REALLY wanna see. 
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:29 pm |
|
|
|
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
|
I don't think BKB would want to see your anticipated list getting top billing, do you? I don't think he would want to see it there at all. :razz:
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:33 pm |
|
|
|
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
|
Maverikk wrote: I don't think BKB would want to see your anticipated list getting top billing, do you? I don't think he would want to see it there at all. :razz: C'mon Mav, are you the troll's keeper, or does he keep you? :wink: And it's still there, bolded, just like he asked. If HE asks me to have it be on top, that's cool, but I said that I'd put whatever he wanted in my sig, not that I'd take out everything else too. :razz:
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:26 pm |
|
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11028
|
BOMB!
|
| Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:19 pm |
|
|
|
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
|
MovieDude wrote: Maverikk wrote: I don't think BKB would want to see your anticipated list getting top billing, do you? I don't think he would want to see it there at all. :razz: C'mon Mav, are you the troll's keeper, or does he keep you? :wink: And it's still there, bolded, just like he asked. If HE asks me to have it be on top, that's cool, but I said that I'd put whatever he wanted in my sig, not that I'd take out everything else too. :razz: _________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:43 am |
|
|
|
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 1882
|
Let's get riled up about corporate earnings.
. . . .
Globalization is bad news ya'll.
_________________
how am I not myself?
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:58 am |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
 BKB. We made a bet, too. Though, it's not applicable at this time...
BKB wrote: Zingaling wrote: BKB, I'm definently in on this bet. If The Amityville Horror makes $50 million opening weekend, I will do what you asked, which is to post at Rotten Tomatoes for one week, any thread or post you wanted posted. BUT, if The Amityville Horrror fails to reach $50 million on opening weekend, you have to not only change your signature to "I got PWNED by a stupid teenager over predicting a stupid PG-13 teen horror movie. The Ring Two owns!". This must be in regular (12 pt) font, and bold writing. AND, if if makes under $50 million, you have to stop writing in bold font for a week. Just regular writing like the rest of us. One week. Why did I add this? For one, I don't want our bet to be the exact same as everyone. And, since I'm willing to sacrifice my week to post things for you in other places, this seems to be fair that you actually match my side by doing something other than putting something in your signature.
If you're willing to accept, then game on. :wink: We'll find out on April 16th... :wink:
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:09 am |
|
|
|
The Scottie
King Albert!
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
|
Spiderman2005 wrote: jb007 wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: What's the big deal between The Ring Two and Regal? From What I know, due to gross sharing dispute with Dreamworks, Regal assigned only a few screens in its 550 theaters. That reduced the saturation limit for The Ring 2. If Regal only has 550 theaters, than the gross should have not been affected that much. What do you mean not that affected. I mean, 550 of the 3332 theater is was released in is like 17% of the theaters it play in. And playing in only 1 print in all but a few Regal's, that's gotta hurt. If it did get the multi-print release, it would have added at least 5 million to it's gross. _________________Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.    and many more.
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:14 am |
|
|
|
xXVincentxX
La Bella Vito
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
|
Scott Vasquez wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: jb007 wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: What's the big deal between The Ring Two and Regal? From What I know, due to gross sharing dispute with Dreamworks, Regal assigned only a few screens in its 550 theaters. That reduced the saturation limit for The Ring 2. If Regal only has 550 theaters, than the gross should have not been affected that much. What do you mean not that affected. I mean, 550 of the 3332 theater is was released in is like 17% of the theaters it play in. And playing in only 1 print in all but a few Regal's, that's gotta hurt. If it did get the multi-print release, it would have added at least 5 million to it's gross. I spit on Regal, evil bastards! [-(
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:37 am |
|
|
|
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
|
Scott Vasquez wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: jb007 wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: What's the big deal between The Ring Two and Regal? From What I know, due to gross sharing dispute with Dreamworks, Regal assigned only a few screens in its 550 theaters. That reduced the saturation limit for The Ring 2. If Regal only has 550 theaters, than the gross should have not been affected that much. What do you mean not that affected. I mean, 550 of the 3332 theater is was released in is like 17% of the theaters it play in. And playing in only 1 print in all but a few Regal's, that's gotta hurt. If it did get the multi-print release, it would have added at least 5 million to it's gross.  I mean it did get tore up in the reviews and now has a 24% on the RT Meter with more negative than positive?? _________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:16 am |
|
|
|
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
|
It's going to plummet next weekend. I'm extremely disappointed as it won't reach 90m much less 100m. It might not even finish with 75m. Yes, it's that frontloaded.
The frontloading is worse then I expected, although it's not a complete shock. As a horror sequel, this film was always certain to have a low multiplier. This is however why it should have opened with 60m+. The frontloading is so great, an opening like that might not even have allowed it to beat the original's gross.
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:27 am |
|
|
|
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
|
Not only was it on a single print, it went deeper then that. Now I understand why Regal never had a trailer for The Ring Two with any of it's movies.
|
| Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:18 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 87 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
