Author |
Message |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
CNN wrote: Obama to name Sotomayor as Supreme Court pick
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Obama has chosen federal Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, two sources told CNN on Tuesday.
Sotomayor will be the first Hispanic U.S. Supreme Court justice if confirmed
Obama plans to announce his nominee at 10:15 a.m. ET Tuesday, sources told CNN.
Obama said Saturday he wants intellectual firepower and a common touch in the next Supreme Court justice and said he doesn't "feel weighed down by having to choose ... based on demographics."
Obama's nominee will replace retiring Justice David Souter, who announced this month he would step down when the court's current session ends this summer.
There had been wide speculation that Obama would name a woman to the court, which has one female justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Obama also had been under pressure to nominate a Hispanic justice to the court, which has never had one.
Obama's nomination will have to be confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee and the full Senate.
The nominee is not expected to have difficulty being confirmed in the Democratic-controlled Senate in time for the new court session in October.
The president has said he hopes to have hearings in July, with the confirmation completed before Congress leaves for the summer. http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/26/ ... index.html
|
Tue May 26, 2009 8:55 am |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
It's great to see the best high jumper of all time get some recognition by the U.S. Nevertheless, I am a bit puzzled by Obama's decision to nominate a Cuban national for Supreme Court. To me, that shows a certain lack of judgement and the deficiencies in the vetting process; expect a bitter nomination battle, as Republicans will almost certainly bring up the doping allegations of the late 90's.
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 9:15 am |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
She's a bit loud, but all this talk of her lacking intelligence is misguided garbage. She'll bring a bit of diversity to the court, something I welcome. She loves the power that comes with the position, and there are many quotes Republicans will pounce on during the process, but from what I know, I don't disagree with her statements regarding the role of a judge and how being a non-white female can effect her views.
All in all, it's a very Obama-like nomination, I think everyone saw it coming and I really like the pick (my kind of SCJ). Krem's right though, Republicans are going to go for blood despite the fact that she was nominated to a position by Bush and is fairly moderate.
Anyone know her stance on gay marriage/abortion ... she is Cathlioc ... ?
_________________
|
Tue May 26, 2009 9:49 am |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Anyone else think that Kathy Bates is a shoe-in for the role of Sonia Sotomayor?
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 9:53 am |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
I can see it.
_________________
|
Tue May 26, 2009 9:59 am |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Eagle wrote: She's a bit loud, but all this talk of her lacking intelligence is misguided garbage. She'll bring a bit of diversity to the court, something I welcome. She loves the power that comes with the position, and there are many quotes Republicans will pounce on during the process, but from what I know, I don't disagree with her statements regarding the role of a judge and how being a non-white female can effect her views.
All in all, it's a very Obama-like nomination, I think everyone saw it coming and I really like the pick (my kind of SCJ). Krem's right though, Republicans are going to go for blood despite the fact that she was nominated to a position by Bush and is fairly moderate.
Anyone know her stance on gay marriage/abortion ... she is Cathlioc ... ? She is pro abortion. Federal Courts don't often end up in the gay marriage debate but I would guess that she is in favor. Why is she your type of justice?
|
Tue May 26, 2009 10:50 am |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Krem wrote: It's great to see the best high jumper of all time get some recognition by the U.S. Nevertheless, I am a bit puzzled by Obama's decision to nominate a Cuban national for Supreme Court. To me, that shows a certain lack of judgement and the deficiencies in the vetting process; expect a bitter nomination battle, as Republicans will almost certainly bring up the doping allegations of the late 90's. Her family is from Puerto Rico not Cuba but she was born in the U.S so I don't see an issue there. If the republican attack her they can kiss away any chance at regaining the Hispanic vote.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 11:04 am |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5812
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Jedi Master Carr wrote: Krem wrote: It's great to see the best high jumper of all time get some recognition by the U.S. Nevertheless, I am a bit puzzled by Obama's decision to nominate a Cuban national for Supreme Court. To me, that shows a certain lack of judgement and the deficiencies in the vetting process; expect a bitter nomination battle, as Republicans will almost certainly bring up the doping allegations of the late 90's. Her family is from Puerto Rico not Cuba but she was born in the U.S so I don't see an issue there. If the republican attack her they can kiss away any chance at regaining the Hispanic vote. He was joking referring to Javier Sotomayor instead.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 11:27 am |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Alex Y. wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: Krem wrote: It's great to see the best high jumper of all time get some recognition by the U.S. Nevertheless, I am a bit puzzled by Obama's decision to nominate a Cuban national for Supreme Court. To me, that shows a certain lack of judgement and the deficiencies in the vetting process; expect a bitter nomination battle, as Republicans will almost certainly bring up the doping allegations of the late 90's. Her family is from Puerto Rico not Cuba but she was born in the U.S so I don't see an issue there. If the republican attack her they can kiss away any chance at regaining the Hispanic vote. He was joking referring to Javier Sotomayor instead. 
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 1:35 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
OH lol nm then.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 3:08 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
i'm not sure yet about this pick. I've heard both good and bad things about this woman. There are a few trouble things such as her saying that the appeals court is where laws are made. Which is completely incorrect, that would be the legislative branch. 5 of her 6 court cases that reached the supreme court were overturned by the supreme court. I don't know what the cases are, haven't had time to read about them to see if it was just politicking. The final one is saying that in situations a Hispanic woman with her experience will rule better than a white man. Their job is to follow the constitution, it shouldn't matter what your background is. It's basically reverse racism. If I said a statement such as a white man will rule better than a Hispanic woman, that would be considered racist.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 4:24 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Jim Halpert wrote: i'm not sure yet about this pick. I've heard both good and bad things about this woman. There are a few trouble things such as her saying that the appeals court is where laws are made. Which is completely incorrect, that would be the legislative branch. 5 of her 6 court cases that reached the supreme court were overturned by the supreme court. I don't know what the cases are, haven't had time to read about them to see if it was just politicking. The final one is saying that in situations a Hispanic woman with her experience will rule better than a white man. Their job is to follow the constitution, it shouldn't matter what your background is. It's basically reverse racism. If I said a statement such as a white man will rule better than a Hispanic woman, that would be considered racist. What she said was that her background goes into how she legislates, and come on that is the truth. Humans beings aren't robots who can determine the law. Hell all our founding fathers were very imperfect men. She is a slightly left moderate and I don't see her being a problem.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 6:21 pm |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Umm, here's what she said: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15judge.htmlIt's not about her background going into how she legislates, it's about her thinking her background is better than others'.
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue May 26, 2009 7:12 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
With cases related to those experiences, wouldn't her background be better than others? Her background gives her experience that your typical SCJ simply doesn't have, situations where she can apply that experience on the court certainly are situations where she is better capable than those lacking those experiences.
I think people blow these comments way out of proportion. She is simply saying that her past experiences give her a unique window into a life that others in her position do not have, that window gives her a better view into the situation than someone staring at a wall.
As for the laws are made comment, it's also the truth. Laws are framed in the legislative branch, but they are chiseled into context through the appeals process. I like her.
_________________
|
Tue May 26, 2009 7:32 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
As for her experience, isn't it basically the same as all the other justices at the time of their appointment? Ivy League law school? Check. (Only Justice Stevens went to, gasp, Northwestern) Court of Appeals judge? Check Middle aged? Check. No legislative experience? Check.
|
Wed May 27, 2009 10:49 am |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
Caius wrote: As for her experience, isn't it basically the same as all the other justices at the time of their appointment? Ivy League law school? Check. (Only Justice Stevens went to, gasp, Northwestern) Court of Appeals judge? Check Middle aged? Check. No legislative experience? Check. Well she has been on the bench longer that is the only difference. I am for someone with experience like her. I take her over the two non judges that were considered.
|
Wed May 27, 2009 12:07 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
I would have rather had Elena Kagen. I am sick of court of appeals judges being nominated.
The best thing about Sotomayor is that she has district court experience. At least she will know how evidentiary and jurisdictional issues affect day-to-day litigants.
|
Wed May 27, 2009 12:47 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court
A wise choice politically, especially since she was first nominated to the federal bench by the first President Bush and was approved by Republicans then. She's pretty moderate, which is good because she's replacing a moderate. If a conservative had resigned and Obama tried to replace a conservative with a liberal, the GOP would have a better argument, but here, they just look obstinant.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Wed May 27, 2009 2:16 pm |
|
|