Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 7:29 pm



Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 Tea Parties?? 
Author Message
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Groucho wrote:
For some reason, the right doesn't think it's that big of a deal.


Wait until it's revealed that some prominent Republican was wire-tapped. Then they'll be all over it. It's like the DHS monitoring. They were all for it when it was targeting anti-war protestors and environmentalists. The milisecond they mentioned "right-wing extremists," the wingnuts went apeshit.


Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:49 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Tea Parties??
If you people are still wondering why I'm just sort of eyerolling at this whole thing, which I tend to do towards political things in the first place, here's Rick Perry being an idiot:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/1 ... 87490.html

I'm starting to wonder if the party is only getting more extreme, like edging into 1990s-militia-group extreme.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:55 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jedi, what tax bracket are you in? Does anyone here, other than Groucho and Krem, even pay federal income taxes? And I do not mean file, I mean pay.


Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:41 pm
Profile WWW
The Original
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am
Posts: 9808
Location: Suisse
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Save money
Inflation
Taxes


Obama seems not to want save money or he cant (with all the programs running)

So taxes is still better than inflation. At least when you have some fix taxes you can make your budget.


Here in Switzerland it seems we go the save money way to fix the mess. Also not funny.

_________________
Libs wrote:
FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.


Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:49 pm
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Caius wrote:
Jedi, what tax bracket are you in? Does anyone here, other than Groucho and Krem, even pay federal income taxes? And I do not mean file, I mean pay.


I start paying federal income tax in about 2 months once I start my job.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:10 am
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Caius wrote:
Jedi, what tax bracket are you in? Does anyone here, other than Groucho and Krem, even pay federal income taxes? And I do not mean file, I mean pay.


I pay. And I'm self-employed which means I pay both the individual and employer payroll taxes as well.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:19 am
Profile WWW
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Beeblebrox wrote:
Caius wrote:
Jedi, what tax bracket are you in? Does anyone here, other than Groucho and Krem, even pay federal income taxes? And I do not mean file, I mean pay.


I pay. And I'm self-employed which means I pay both the individual and employer payroll taxes as well.


Do you feel you pay around the right amount?

Tax Year 2008 was the first year, since I have been old enough to work, that I did not pay federal income taxes. I had no job. Thankfully you taxpayers paid the interest accrued on my loans.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:26 am
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Caius wrote:
Do you feel you pay around the right amount?


I don't have a sense of what the right amount is. Do I feel burdened by them? Not really. Do they make me want to make less money so I pay fewer taxes? On the contrary.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:56 am
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: Tea Parties??
I have no problems with the wiretapping, so long as it helps keep the country safe. They can come listen in on me anytime.

_________________
Image


Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:48 am
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 8684
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Beeblebrox wrote:
Caius wrote:
Jedi, what tax bracket are you in? Does anyone here, other than Groucho and Krem, even pay federal income taxes? And I do not mean file, I mean pay.


I pay. And I'm self-employed which means I pay both the individual and employer payroll taxes as well.


just a point.....but your taxes are lowered greatly by business expenses....depending on how agressive you are with your return.....sure hope there are no personal expenses mixed in there.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:23 am
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Whatever valid message some protesters have against the current tax and spending policies of the US is sorta undermined when they also have nutters saying Texas should secede from the Union.

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:08 pm
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: Tea Parties??
gulli you're not from america so you may not know but Texas has always been sort of an odd place.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:17 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Caius wrote:
Jedi, what tax bracket are you in? Does anyone here, other than Groucho and Krem, even pay federal income taxes? And I do not mean file, I mean pay.


I am a poor graduate student right now so I don't pay income taxes. Although, I had to take money out of retirement fund and lost some of that money. I didn't mind paying it though. I Also we all pay taxes so its really a mute point. About Texas give me a break, the Civil War proved the govt can stop succession. Let Texas try it we would kick their ass.
I have one other thing to add, I am tired of this garbage saying the founding fathers were for limited government. Most of them weren't not sure there is Jefferson, but all the federalists from Washington, Adams, and Hamilton were for big goverment and actually raised taxes when they got into office.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:18 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jim Halpert wrote:
gulli you're not from america so you may not know but Texas has always been sort of an odd place.

Yeah that is the other, there is still a Texas Succession party, so I don't take their threats very seriously.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:23 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Isn't it strange that South Carolina was always the first to secede? You'd think it'd be Texas...

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:37 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jim Halpert wrote:
gulli you're not from america so you may not know but Texas has always been sort of an odd place.


Odd place or not, did Gov Perry or the GOP ever pass a resolution declaring Texas sovereignty during the 8 years Bush was in charge?


Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: Tea Parties??
AnJon Lyrik Chigurh wrote:
Isn't it strange that South Carolina was always the first to secede? You'd think it'd be Texas...


Not really SC talked about succeeding back in the 1820's with John C Calhoun.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:36 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
AnJon Lyrik Chigurh wrote:
Isn't it strange that South Carolina was always the first to secede? You'd think it'd be Texas...


Not really SC talked about succeeding back in the 1820's with John C Calhoun.


Was that when they actually seceded for a little bit until Andrew Jackson went down and kicked their asses?

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:25 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
I have one other thing to add, I am tired of this garbage saying the founding fathers were for limited government. Most of them weren't not sure there is Jefferson, but all the federalists from Washington, Adams, and Hamilton were for big goverment and actually raised taxes when they got into office.


I am not sure what you mean by this. If you read the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights plus the 11th Amendment, it certainly seems to me that they were for a limited government.

The Federal Gov't cannot establish a religion, abridge free speech, most have probable cause to issue a warrant, cannot quarter troops, due process generally, etc.

Plus Madison, the "father" of the Constitution, thought of our tripartite governmental structure as providing "checks and balances" such that the branches would limit the power of the other branches.

Now they might have had different positions on tariffs and the First National Bank, but I think that hardly means they were for in favor of some sort of unlimited government that you are inferring from their acts.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:59 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22182
Location: Places
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Gulli wrote:
Whatever valid message some protesters have against the current tax and spending policies of the US is sorta undermined when they also have nutters saying Texas should secede from the Union.


texas is full of people like that; it wont ever happen.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:05 pm
Profile
The Original
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am
Posts: 9808
Location: Suisse
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
gulli you're not from america so you may not know but Texas has always been sort of an odd place.

Yeah that is the other, there is still a Texas Succession party, so I don't take their threats very seriously.



And who do they want to join? Mexico? Not really....or?

_________________
Libs wrote:
FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:23 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Tea Parties??
FILMO wrote:
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
gulli you're not from america so you may not know but Texas has always been sort of an odd place.

Yeah that is the other, there is still a Texas Succession party, so I don't take their threats very seriously.



And who do they want to join? Mexico? Not really....or?

Knowing Texans, they would want to start their own republic. Similar to their existence from 1836-1845. It actually used to be its own independent nation.


Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:43 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Caius wrote:
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
I have one other thing to add, I am tired of this garbage saying the founding fathers were for limited government. Most of them weren't not sure there is Jefferson, but all the federalists from Washington, Adams, and Hamilton were for big goverment and actually raised taxes when they got into office.


I am not sure what you mean by this. If you read the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights plus the 11th Amendment, it certainly seems to me that they were for a limited government.

The Federal Gov't cannot establish a religion, abridge free speech, most have probable cause to issue a warrant, cannot quarter troops, due process generally, etc.

Plus Madison, the "father" of the Constitution, thought of our tripartite governmental structure as providing "checks and balances" such that the branches would limit the power of the other branches.

Now they might have had different positions on tariffs and the First National Bank, but I think that hardly means they were for in favor of some sort of unlimited government that you are inferring from their acts.

Ask any colonial historian. I discussion with one and he said they were mostly for Big govt, especially the Federalists. Hamilton wanted something like England had but with more elections. Also the Tripartite government really came from John Adams, Madison borrowed it from (Adams devised the same thing in the Mass. Constitution). Also that had nothing to do with small government that was to keep the power from being controlled by one part of government, although Hamilton hated the idea and wanted a weak legislature and a strong executive branch. Madison wanted that in there to keep the country from becoming a monarchy. It isn't like the check and balances are gone either, you still see each branch have about the same amount of power that the constitution devised, except for the Executive branch which got that power really starting with Lincoln. Finally, our forefathers are the best examples anyways since if we went back to their principals, African-Americans would be enslaved, Native Americans slaughtered, and women have no rights. They were 18th century people, we need to move into the 21th century.


Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:44 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: Tea Parties??
AnJon Lyrik Chigurh wrote:
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
AnJon Lyrik Chigurh wrote:
Isn't it strange that South Carolina was always the first to secede? You'd think it'd be Texas...


Not really SC talked about succeeding back in the 1820's with John C Calhoun.


Was that when they actually seceded for a little bit until Andrew Jackson went down and kicked their asses?

Yep, that was when it came to pivotal point in 1832 I think.
Caius wrote:
FILMO wrote:
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
gulli you're not from america so you may not know but Texas has always been sort of an odd place.

Yeah that is the other, there is still a Texas Succession party, so I don't take their threats very seriously.



And who do they want to join? Mexico? Not really....or?

Knowing Texans, they would want to start their own republic. Similar to their existence from 1836-1845. It actually used to be its own independent nation.


Only crazies would want that now, 75% of Texans wouldn't want to be independent. It wouldn't survive on its own. It has no real big industry for it to survive.


Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:49 am
Profile WWW
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Tea Parties??
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
Only crazies would want that now, 75% of Texans wouldn't want to be independent. It wouldn't survive on its own. It has no real big industry for it to survive.


Oil is a fairly large industry plus Texas it has lots of cattle and tech is a pretty large industry there. It also has ocean access. Texas has a fairly large population and decent size geographically. Roughly the size of France. As long as the U.S. left them alone, I don't see why they couldn't survive on their own.

Plus my response was based on Filmo's question, not the actual feelings of Texans.


Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:35 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.