So you're saying that voting Obama is wrong!

Thanks for that.

Nice logic.

77 Senators, and 296 House members voted FOR it.

That's 77% and 69%

Well. You said the popular opinion was wrong for voting for the war. And then you said the popular opinion was wrong when wanting Hilary.

So... NOW the popular opinion will get it right?!

HAH! Doubtful!

Yeah, that's because 70-80% of the country's population was fooled by the lies. I wasn't, my dad wasn't, my sister wasn't, and plenty of my friends weren't. I've been against this crap all along and the Congress people who have been against it from the beginning are to be commended.

He hasn't even used the words change and hope, you dolt. The debate has been boring as hell with a bunch of specific policies. Perhaps you need to open your ears.

Why don't you actually watch the debate and look for substance yourself rather than relying on Fox News for your opinions?

I always go to Fox News for my democratic information, just like I go to the YES network when I want to get fair and unbiased news about the Red Sox.

What is with the constant whining regarding Fox News? If you don't like it, don't watch it. Its not like any of you guys watch the channel and note the biased slant.

I prefer CNN but realize there are problems with it just like every network.

Because they are a propaganda arm of the Republican party and not a legitimate news source.

Chill out, it's just a text message vote. Ron Paul won all of the Republican debates because of it. Of course it's biased towards the youth voters' favorite candidate.

I'll have to do some further analysis and research on the situation, but it seems that official polling isn't for another 7 months. These results seem to be a wee bit too early, and, somehow, slanted to represent more of the people who watched the debate, not necessarily the public at large. I'll do a bit of number-crunching and experimentation...

So, looks like Obama sits over some Senate committee on the war in Afghanistan and has done SHIT since he started his campaign because he's "too busy." How bout them apples?

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton has actively overseen two committee while campaigning for her life.

Hmm.. I ask again, who can do this job better?

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/27/clinton-camp-says-obama-too-busy-to-fulfill-senate-duties/

Obama really will be rather useless if US faces security problems...

He's too busy becoming the next President while Ms Clinton will stay forever in the Senate and whine about things.

Hmmm, I seem to recall saying this, but when I say it, I'm accused of not knowing what I'm talking about.. Perhaps it's because today's generation is to wrapped up in the Pope Obama pop culture to actually realize this and are too busy fainting to every word he spews??

Maybe it's because you continue to say shit like this:

In a crisis, presidents rely on the people they've appointed, cabinet heads and such. Obama has so far shown that he'll surround himself with experienced intelligent people, so I'm not worried about that.

Hillary is more scary, because she's shown she values loyalty over competence.

I've done that already, but you, of course, like to ignore facts that don't support your pre-conceived ideas. Seriously, the idea that a majority of the democratic party, including many of its leaders, are so stupid as to be completely duped is just laughable. So I'm not going waste any more time on it.

I already see people buying into the Jimmy Carter comparison with Obama. I guess republicans and Hillary supporters make that stupid comparison because they see both Obama and Carter as nice people. I also agree with Obama's poilcy on not treating the whole world as enemies and willing to make talks with China unlike Hillary