Author |
Message |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22182 Location: Places
|
 Re: Ohio debate
Hillary made herself look likea fool, no doubt.
"why am i always asked questions first???"
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:36 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Ohio debate
I thought they both did well. Hillary's comments about foreign policy were good, and Obama spoke well as always. Hillary needed a knock out punch though to keep Obama from rising so much, and I don't think she got one.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:36 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Ohio debate
Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points.
|
Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:38 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Ohio debate
redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. There's an editorial in today's Time encouraging her to drop out for not only the good of the party but to keep her ... well, I'm not sure what word to use. Image? Popularity?* The idea is that by dropping out and endorsing Obama, she will endear herself to all democrats and will heal whatever split is happening in the party, whereas if she continues to fight to the end, it will just cause people to be angry with her... * You can tell I'm a published author and successful attorney by my magnificent mastery of the language. Shut up.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:43 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Ohio debate
Groucho wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. There's an editorial in today's Time encouraging her to drop out for not only the good of the party but to keep her ... well, I'm not sure what word to use. Image? Popularity?* The idea is that by dropping out and endorsing Obama, she will endear herself to all democrats and will heal whatever split is happening in the party, whereas if she continues to fight to the end, it will just cause people to be angry with her... * You can tell I'm a published author and successful attorney by my magnificent mastery of the language. Shut up. If she drops out before March 4th it would definitely help her reputation in the party. It makes her a potential candidate in 2012 or 2016. If she digs her heels in and still loses, her Presidential hopes are gone forever.
|
Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:47 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: Ohio debate
redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. Gee?? If the voting process in the General Election enabled voters to text message their vote like they had for last night's debate, you all could vote more than 1 time for the same candidate which is how it was last night which is why they said Pope Obama was at 70% over Clinton at 30% cause Clinton clearly held her own far better than Obama and her answers to Russert's questions showed she had more experience than Obama, but at this point, I suppose it doesn't matter right??.. Face it: You all had your minds made up to text message Obama more than 1 time as winning the debate whether the debate took place or not..
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:39 am |
|
 |
jujubee
Forum General
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:45 pm Posts: 6447
|
 Re: Ohio debate
BKB of Solace wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. Gee?? If the voting process in the General Election enabled voters to text message their vote like they had for last night's debate, you all could vote more than 1 time for the same candidate which is how it was last night which is why they said Pope Obama was at 70% over Clinton at 30% cause Clinton clearly held her own far better than Obama and her answers to Russert's questions showed she had more experience than Obama, but at this point, I suppose it doesn't matter right??.. Face it: You all had your minds made up to text message Obama more than 1 time as winning the debate whether the debate took place or not..BKB, never stop being so adorable.
_________________ ......
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:43 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: Ohio debate
jujubee wrote: BKB of Solace wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. Gee?? If the voting process in the General Election enabled voters to text message their vote like they had for last night's debate, you all could vote more than 1 time for the same candidate which is how it was last night which is why they said Pope Obama was at 70% over Clinton at 30% cause Clinton clearly held her own far better than Obama and her answers to Russert's questions showed she had more experience than Obama, but at this point, I suppose it doesn't matter right??.. Face it: You all had your minds made up to text message Obama more than 1 time as winning the debate whether the debate took place or not..BKB, never stop being so adorable. I promise you I won't, but it is true.. 
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:52 am |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Ohio debate
BKB of Solace wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. Gee?? If the voting process in the General Election enabled voters to text message their vote like they had for last night's debate, you all could vote more than 1 time for the same candidate which is how it was last night which is why they said Pope Obama was at 70% over Clinton at 30% cause Clinton clearly held her own far better than Obama and her answers to Russert's questions showed she had more experience than Obama, but at this point, I suppose it doesn't matter right??.. Face it: You all had your minds made up to text message Obama more than 1 time as winning the debate whether the debate took place or not..Or you can face this: I didn't text message at all so don't blame me. I don't ever participate in text message voting. I'm too much of a cheapskate for that.
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:56 am |
|
 |
insomniacdude
I just lost the game
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 pm Posts: 5868
|
 Re: Ohio debate
BKB of Solace wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Yeah, she didn't land anything on him. That hug with Chelsea says it all I think. She knows she's done. The best thing for her will be to drop out when she loses the delegate count (and possibly the popular vote) in Texas and only wins Ohio by 5-8 points. Gee?? If the voting process in the General Election enabled voters to text message their vote like they had for last night's debate, you all could vote more than 1 time for the same candidate which is how it was last night which is why they said Pope Obama was at 70% over Clinton at 30% cause Clinton clearly held her own far better than Obama and her answers to Russert's questions showed she had more experience than Obama, but at this point, I suppose it doesn't matter right??.. Face it: You all had your minds made up to text message Obama more than 1 time as winning the debate whether the debate took place or not..I'm pretty sure nobody here actually texted in their "votes".
_________________
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:38 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Ohio debate
I agree, Hillary had a right to ask why she was always being asked first, but hey, the Liberal media is a very powerful tool and I think they've clearly selected their candidate.
_________________
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:18 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
 Re: Ohio debate
Wow, I've finally found a use for the ignore function on this forum. Never thought I'd ever use it.
Peace, Mike
|
Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:34 pm |
|
|