| Author |
Message |
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
 Clinton on Iran Clinton further displayed tough talk in an interview airing on Good Morning America Tuesday, ABC News' Chris Cuomo asked Clinton what she would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.
"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president we will attack Iran," Clinton said. "In the next ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them." http://www.abcnews.go.com/WN/Vote2008/s ... 059&page=1So she'd kill 70 million people in retaliation for an attack on Israel.
|
| Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:52 pm |
 
|
|
|
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Cambridge, England.
|
Re: Clinton on Iran dumb bitch
_________________
|
| Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:43 pm |
|
|
|
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
|
Re: Clinton on Iran Nuking Iran wouldn't go over very well with certain parts of the world. It could also set off another cold war with Russia and China since they both are in bed with Iran.
|
| Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:31 pm |
|
|
|
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
|
Re: Clinton on Iran nuking anyone probably wouldnt go over very well
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:02 am |
|
|
|
Anita Hussein Briem
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
|
Re: Clinton on Iran Jedi Master Carr wrote: Nuking Iran wouldn't go over very well with certain parts of the world. It could also set off another cold war with Russia and China since they both are in bed with Iran. A "cold" war would be a best-case scenario. Hillary is blatantly and unambiguously threatening nuclear war. 
_________________
(hitokiri battousai)
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:14 am |
|
|
|
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
|
Re: Clinton on Iran Angela Merkel wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: Nuking Iran wouldn't go over very well with certain parts of the world. It could also set off another cold war with Russia and China since they both are in bed with Iran. A "cold" war would be a best-case scenario. Hillary is blatantly and unambiguously threatening nuclear war. i mean at least we'd go out in a blaze of glory....................
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:41 am |
|
|
|
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Re: Clinton on Iran Can you imagine the reaction if Bush or Obama said that? Just goes to show how in the time since the last primary she has gone from "probably not going to win" to "we're just going to ignore her and hope she goes away." She's mismanaged her campaign from the jump, this should be her nomination, shall be an interesting general election.  _________________
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:09 am |
|
|
|
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
Re: Clinton on Iran Archie Gates wrote: Clinton further displayed tough talk in an interview airing on Good Morning America Tuesday, ABC News' Chris Cuomo asked Clinton what she would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.
"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president we will attack Iran," Clinton said. "In the next ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them." http://www.abcnews.go.com/WN/Vote2008/s ... 059&page=1So she'd kill 70 million people in retaliation for an attack on Israel. I've come to senses now. If and when Israel or my country bombs Iran's nuclear site(s) then Iran will have every right as a sovereign nation to retaliate and defend itself. Case closed.
_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN
45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:19 am |
|
|
|
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Re: Clinton on Iran loyalfromlondon wrote: That's to be expected though, isn't it, regardless of who throws the first punch. The idea is to incapacitate Iran to such a degree that it wouldn't have much, if anything left to retaliate with.
It's all a moot point anyway. Israel would clean Iran's clock if there was a nuclear exchange. The only way the US is involved is if a country other than Iran is involved. Israel has more than enough strength to deal with Iran. Yeah, because we've been outfitting them for decades. _________________
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:46 pm |
|
|
|
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
|
Re: Clinton on Iran The fact anybody worries about a nuclear conflict in the Middle East is amusing to me.
_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
| Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:51 pm |
|
|
