Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jun 15, 2024 5:10 pm



Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
 The Sum of All Fears 

What grade would you give this film?
A 21%  21%  [ 3 ]
B 43%  43%  [ 6 ]
C 29%  29%  [ 4 ]
D 7%  7%  [ 1 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 14

 The Sum of All Fears 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post The Sum of All Fears
The Sum of All Fears

Image

Quote:
The Sum of All Fears is a 2002 American action film/political thriller directed by Phil Alden Robinson and based on a book of the same name by Tom Clancy. Starring Ben Affleck and Morgan Freeman it was released by Paramount Pictures in the United States on May 31, 2002.

This fourth film in the Jack Ryan film series is a reboot set in 2002, with Ryan portrayed as younger than in the 1990 film The Hunt for Red October (set in 1984), and that film's sequels, Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger.


I didn't find it all that great. C+


Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:12 pm
Profile
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
WOW!! it was so boring!, bad acting, ummm..... dont know i dont like the film

C-/D+


Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:56 am
Profile
Teenage Dream
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:13 pm
Posts: 10677
Post 
C

Boring and bad. The only exciting thing was the explosion.


Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:08 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
Hmm, I'll give this movie a compliment. I was actually surprised when I saw this because I thought Ben Affleck actually made a very effective Jack Ryan. And I don't like Affleck in movies usually. It's been a while so I don't remember it very well, but I remember enough to say it's about a B-.


Fri Jun 10, 2005 5:49 pm
Profile WWW
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
I agree, Atoddr.

It was a decent film, probably unloved here due to lack of 'spolsions. But fun, all the same. I don't really care for Affleck either, but he worked nicely here. Good suspense leading up to the detonation and a great storyline.

B


Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:44 pm
Profile YIM WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
B


Decent flick. Ben Affleck isn't even half as bad in it, as many make it seem. Entertaining throughout, but nowhere near the Jack Ryan masterpiece Clear and Present Danger. It would also rank it below Hunt for the Red October and on the same level as The Patriot Games.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Last edited by Dr. Lecter on Wed May 16, 2007 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:21 pm
Profile WWW
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
Very good suspense thriller, about on par with say Crimson Tide. Liev Shrieber was so popular and effective in his small part that I'm dumbfounded that they didn't spin off his character (There are Clancy books about that guy) into his own franchise.

Affleck is good and Bridget Moynihan was never better, before or since. It suffers from a lack of action is the main problem, and by action I dont mean explosions but real person to person conflict. But it has suspense and moves crisply from scene to scene, that's a kind of action that too many movies don't have.

I really don't get why they didn't make another Affleck Ryan movie after this. It seems like actors who take this role, including Baldwin, brush off the success and don't realize how much it helps their career.

B+


Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:13 am
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32139
Location: the last free city
Post 
A :D simply cause the nuke went off.

_________________
Is it 2024 yet?


Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:16 am
Profile
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
revolutions wrote:
A :D simply cause the nuke went off.

Yeah gotta give them credit for that, it was ballsy.


Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:17 am
Profile WWW
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post 
Hard movie to judge. Everything before the bomb goes off is average but the sequences after are thrilling and capture the more free flowing aspects of Clancys novels perfectly. So C for before the nuke A for after averaged out.

B

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:32 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21657
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Horrible Movie, Affleck killed future Jack Ryan films, because well hes Ben Affleck. It also singlehandidly crippled Fords career, for not doing this, due to so many rewrites, he left and signed the 2 picture deal of K19 and Hollywood Homicide.

Clear and Present Danger- A
Hunt For Red October- A
Patriot Games- A-
Sum of All Fears- C-

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:48 am
Profile
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
Affleck really kills the character of Jack Ryan. The rest of the cast is solid and most of the exchanges are good. The script probably could have been touched up again. The score is quite haunting and memorable. It's a solid way to spend an afternoon, though it probably insults our intelligence every so often... it's intriguing for those that like spy thrillers, though it isn't exactly suspenseful.

B-/C+ due to the weak lead.


Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:46 pm
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post 
D- sk; ;motehr fcukcin affelersch is the worst ats er oardudn


Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:14 am
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
The movie was fine. Affleck was fine. Liev Schreiber needs a spy franchise. It was, frankly, better than either Harrison Ford Jack Ryan flick, which weren't that good to begin with.

Red October is the King.

_________________
k


Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:23 pm
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post 
C-. Just not very good.


Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:56 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
The second-best Jack Ryan film, bested only by Red October. Ben Affleck is no Alec Baldwin or Harrison Ford, but he's fine in the role, and he's surrounded by a great supporting cast and a stellar script. The story is smart and plays out nicely, even if the villains are kinda one-dimensional. The build-up is great and everything after the nuke goes off is pure excitement. Liev Schreiber is terrific, but there's also great performances from Morgan Freeman, Bridget Moynahan, and especially CiarĂ¡n Hinds as the Russian prez. The effects are solid and the suspense amps up throughout the flick. Not a classic, just a smart, entertaining thriller.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Tue May 15, 2007 5:20 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.