Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 10:23 am



Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
 Resident Evil: Apocalypse 

What grade would you give this film?
A 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
B 9%  9%  [ 1 ]
C 27%  27%  [ 3 ]
D 55%  55%  [ 6 ]
F 9%  9%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 11

 Resident Evil: Apocalypse 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Resident Evil: Apocalypse
Resident Evil: Apocalypse

Image

Quote:
Resident Evil: Apocalypse is a 2004 science fiction-action-horror film directed by Alexander Witt, from a screenplay written by producer Paul W.S. Anderson. It is the second installment in the series of film adaptations based on the Capcom survival horror game series Resident Evil. Borrowing elements from the video games Resident Evil 2, 3: Nemesis, and Code: Veronica, Resident Evil: Apocalypse follows heroine Alice, who has escaped the underground Umbrella facility, who must band with other survivors including Jill Valentine and escape Raccoon City alive.

It is the second film in the Resident Evil film franchise, preceded by Resident Evil (2002) and followed by Resident Evil: Extinction (2007) and Afterlife (2010) with a fifth film titled Resident Evil: Retribution scheduled for 2012.


Freakin' awesome flick.

A-


Last edited by zingy on Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:16 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 19422
Location: San Diego
Post 
Fun, fun, fun.

The first Reisdent Evil is one of my biggest guilty pleasures, and this one is even better thankfully. Sure it is dumb and the plot's good but kind of weak... But it gets the job done for an action movie, it's fun and entertaining as hell.

- B+


Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:19 pm
Profile
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Weak plot, weak writing, but awesome action. One of the better movies of the fall, and beats its predecessor hands down. B

_________________
See above.


Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:36 pm
Profile
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
Before you read my grade, I promise I DID SEE IT! :? :wink:




And I thought it was horrible. Eww. I will refrain from a letter grade.

1.5/4

:x


Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:37 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5823
Post 
Disappointing compared to the greatness of the first one. But still a B-.


Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:59 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
yes it was Fun seeing this movie, but it really was a disappointment for me, i expected a Horror movie not action, pretty lame plot and acting
no where near as good as the first

C+


Fri May 06, 2005 3:06 am
Profile
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
Is it stupid? Yes.

Is it entertaining? Yes.

Is it fun? Yes.

I thought it was better than the first. For one the special effects are better. The story seems more drawn out, and more excuted in this sequel. It's pacing is damn near perfect. It never gets boring, or uninteresting. I thought it was a fun ride, and I was entertained throughout.

B-


Fri May 06, 2005 3:17 am
Profile YIM WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
I give it a C+ because it is entertaining in a very retarded way and unintentionally funny. The whole Nemesis thing was stupid as hell, it didnt follow the game at all, both RE movies have barely anything to do with the games, they just use the name to get the publics attention. I cant wait for Silent Hill it sounds much more true to the game, plot wise.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Fri May 06, 2005 3:29 am
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
Is it stupid? Yes.

Is it entertaining? No.

Is it fun? No.

Is it appalling that the movie gets better grades on this board than, say, Citizen Kane? Definitely.

F


Fri May 06, 2005 5:20 am
Profile
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13299
Location: Vienna
Post 
Levy wrote:
Is it stupid? Yes.

Is it entertaining? No.

Is it fun? No.

Is it appalling that the movie gets better grades on this board than, say, Citizen Kane? Definitely.

F


It's getting soooo old...


Fri May 06, 2005 5:24 am
Profile WWW
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
Riggs27 wrote:
Levy wrote:
Is it stupid? Yes.

Is it entertaining? No.

Is it fun? No.

Is it appalling that the movie gets better grades on this board than, say, Citizen Kane? Definitely.

F


It's getting soooo old...


What is?


Fri May 06, 2005 5:35 am
Profile YIM WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Bad, bad movie. Even worse than the first film, which is saying something. I can't even enjoy the action scenes because it's so stupid. Horrible.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Last edited by trixster on Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon May 08, 2006 5:12 pm
Profile
Post 
Agreed with first three lines in Levy's post. One of the worst movies I've ever seen.


Mon May 08, 2006 8:18 pm
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
It may not be doing a favor to say that the movie was so damn entertaining because it was (mostly) unintentionally funny. But either way, the result is a film so overdramatic and goofy that it becomes a guilty pleasure. I don't know, sometimes I hate these types of movies, but it's hard for me to be really harsh on a movie that has this much carefree energy.


Tue May 09, 2006 8:58 am
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post 
When compared to movies like 28 days later this really does look bad

Even the sight of Milla Jovavich cannot save this pile.

D

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Wed May 10, 2006 12:52 am
Profile
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post 
C+

It's a film that can only be watched once because that's when you realise how bad it is.


Wed May 10, 2006 1:15 am
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:57 am
Posts: 4669
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post 
The most Action packed movie ever, kinda stupid but very entertaining

B+

_________________
My Most anticipated films of 2015


Image


Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:59 am
Profile
The Original
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am
Posts: 9808
Location: Suisse
Post 
Less crappier than the first one but still not good!
5/10

_________________
Libs wrote:
FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.


Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:29 pm
Profile
problem?

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
Post 
Homo Eroticus wrote:
Less crappier than the first one but still not good!
5/10


Really?Mostpeopleseemtolikethefirstonemore,sinceitwasmoreseriousandahorror/thriller, whenApocalypsewasjustanactionpackedthrillride.

Ilikeboth,butI'vefoundthatRE1getsbetterwitheachrepeatviewingandApocalypsegetsworsewitheachview.

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:59 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Still havent seen it, the first was just so bad. Now that the third is out I may check it out at blockbuster. the first wasn't scary, didnt have particularly any good action (apart from that room with lazers that sliced people) and the acting was horrible. I hear this one is better so I may check it out.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:25 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: Resident Evil: Apocalypse
Jeez I take back what I said earlier. It was kinda funny the first time around, but on second viewing the film really is pretty fucking bad. The editing in particular stood out as atrocious. Watching the first film immediately before this, I gotta say losing that film's score drags it down in a big way too. At least the musical cues in the first one were creepy and exciting, not utterly forgettable.


Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:38 am
Profile
problem?

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
Post Re: Resident Evil: Apocalypse
It really does get worse with each viewing. I think the reason it's so goofy/bad is that it's.. following the plot of a freaking video game. Video games do not have good enough plots to be taken seriously in film. Well, the Silent Hill series, definitely. But they fucked that movie up. But yeah, this is my least fav of the series. It doesn't compare at all to RE1 or RE3, both of which I heart.

_________________
Image


Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:52 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Resident Evil: Apocalypse
Finally saw it, and I would say its much better than the wretched first and better than the latest, but the third is still there.

The first was not scary, had nothing to do with the games, and the action was very weak as well. C- it is just a bad adaptation, but now knowing PW Anderson, its what one should expect.

With the second I can at least say its the only one in the series that tried to be the most like the games. You have strong characters in a zombie filled world. Has some cool moments of action and zombie survival, and had the whole, split up and missions aspect that none of the others have had. Nemesis is cool with about as good if cheesy back story it could have had. And Carlos and Jill Valentine are awesome, can't believe they didn't return except to limited roles in 2 films. I actually am glad Anderson did not direct this one. B

The third film is the only one that drops most of the baggage of the the games and goes for a genre Mad Max meets Zombie film, and its pretty decent on that side of things. It also helps that it has the most competent of directors. Though I say that with the slightest of praises as Highlander was his best film and while I love that film, it was 20 years ago and was followed by a lot of trash. B+

Part 4 is not as bad as 1 as we now expect the Resident Evil Franchise will never be as good as the games, but this one while combining things that work with 2 and 3, Anderson really just is a shitty director and the use of slow motion is a killer. Also a terrible ending, and Wesker might be the worst adaptation of a Resident Evil character yet (The Slow motion and him are probably the worst Matrix ripoffs I've seen yet) C

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:35 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Shack, zwackerm and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.