Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 2:34 am



Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
 The War of the Worlds (1953) 

What grade would you give this film?
A 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
B 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
C 50%  50%  [ 1 ]
D 50%  50%  [ 1 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 2

 The War of the Worlds (1953) 
Author Message
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post The War of the Worlds (1953)
The War of the Worlds

Image

Quote:
The War of the Worlds (also known promotionally as H. G. Wells's The War of the Worlds) is a 1953 science fiction film starring Gene Barry and Ann Robinson. It was the first on-screen loose adaptation of the H. G. Wells classic novel of the same name. Produced by George Pal and directed by Byron Haskin from a script by Barré Lyndon, it was the first of several adaptations of Wells's work to be filmed by Pal, and is considered to be one of the great science fiction films of the 1950s. It won an Oscar for its special effects.


Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
This film is an argument against anyone who says that remakes can't be better than the original. Spielberg's film had its problems, but it's nothing compared to the mess that is this one. It's so hopelessly a '50s film that, watching it today, one can't help but feel sorry for the moviegoers of that era - they had no idea what they were missing. I'm not the kind of guy that hates old films just because they're old, but I'm also not the type that loves them for the same reason. I loved The Day the Earth Stood Still despite its flaws, and I hated this. Well, maybe not hated. But definitely disliked it. The effects are groundbreaking, I'm sure, and there are some interesting themes and ideas that are brought up, but everything is wasted because of the terrible dialogue and even worse acting. There are some scenes and lines that are repeated in the remake, but they're interesting only for that reason in this film; much of this film is a throwaway. There are no interesting or even believable characters, there's no clear and concise plot to speak of, and there's a vicious right-wing slant on the whole thing. Fits right into the stereotype of terrible alien invasion flicks from the '50s, despite a better pedigree and reputation.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:02 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
I actually liked it better than the remake. I'd give it somewhere in the range of B+/A-.


Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:42 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.