Author |
Message |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Excel officially predicts Spidey 3 to suck
I mean literally I think a lot of people will simply hate it. They really seem to be pulling a batman n robuin and overdoing it in every sense of the word.
i forsee an enormous dissappointment of a movie. the fact theres no more interest because theyve released so much shit! its not that i wanna see the movie cause i know what happens now from the freaking ads. its just..dumb.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:14 am |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
check yaself boi, das strike two
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:26 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
I felt braincells dying reading this.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:28 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
*Makes fun of excel for making this stupid thread*
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:28 am |
|
 |
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm Posts: 4110 Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
Wow. Just wow.
Excel, between BOM, BOF, and here, you've said a lot of crazy stuff, but this takes the cake. There's not a chance in hell this movie will suck.
_________________ This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:56 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40611
|
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27145
Excel I'm completley with ya
The 3rd superhero film curse feels mighty strong with this one.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:07 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Shack wrote: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27145
Excel I'm completley with ya
The 3rd superhero film curse feels mighty strong with this one.
Both you and Excel need to lay off the pipe.. I can't imagine for 1 minute WHY this movie would suck and as a matter of fact, I predict after this, Sam Raimi will be the King of Director's when it comes to comicbook franchises for having not only 2 highly successful movie's in the series at over a Billion dollars, but the 3rd one will be the charm.. Every post I've read about the trailer being with "300" said it was excellent, especially when the claws reached down and pulled Spiderman up.. I haven't seen 300 now, but can anyone confirm this??? Also at 156 minutes running time, Raimi seems to be wanting to tie alot of things up which is good cause bitter negative fanboys complained it wouldn't be long enough..
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:47 am |
|
 |
Mesjarch
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am Posts: 2388 Location: Poland
|
Spiderman 3 will be 156 minutes long?
Oh shit that's 126 minutes of bullshit and 30 minutes of something worth watching 
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:46 am |
|
 |
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm Posts: 25035 Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
This is the first spidey film im not pumped for, advertising sucks. Im very disappointed, this is the first of the franchise I am not 100% anticipating. Ill be there opening day perhaps, but I dont think Im going to the midnight showing this time around.
_________________The Force Awakens
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:20 am |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:24 pm |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
I've been saying this for like...a year now? Maybe longer.
For once, Excel, I agree with you.
_________________ See above.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:32 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
it is entirely possible though i don't see it happening. If you hear all the reports about Sam Raimi not being happy, Maguire ready to leave and not wanting to work with Dunst. It just sounds like a dysfunctional set and nobody gives a damn about the movie.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:04 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
me thinks thier pulling an x3 n trying play up angle that it might be the last movie.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:07 pm |
|
 |
choubachou
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 1796
|
I remember, with Spidey 2, a bunch of idiots on the Net complaining that they had seen way too much thanks to trailers and shit.
_________________ Best of 2014: 1- Apes 9.5/10 2- Noah 9.0/10 3- Lone Survivor 8.5/10 4- Captain America 8.0/10 5- 300: 8.0/10
|
Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:46 pm |
|
 |
PresidentPalmer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 2:34 am Posts: 1956
|
Yeah whatever not going to happen so stop dreaming. Spiderman will once again reign supreme.
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:43 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
After this thread was created, for some odd reason, I now feel that Spider-Man 3 will be the best one yet.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:46 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Mesjarch wrote: Spiderman 3 will be 156 minutes long? Oh shit that's 126 minutes of bullshit and 30 minutes of something worth watching 
Yeah?? Then don't see the movie, but somehow you will just like every other film elitist bent on nagging anything and everything that is this movie..
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:00 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
BJ wrote: This is the first spidey film im not pumped for, advertising sucks. Im very disappointed, this is the first of the franchise I am not 100% anticipating. Ill be there opening day perhaps, but I dont think Im going to the midnight showing this time around.
And I'm sure Sam Raimi will lose sleep knowing your not going to be at the Midnight show for this movie.. Oh no.. 
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:03 am |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
no hes sleeping very soundly now that hes done with the franchise.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:23 am |
|
 |
Riggs
We had our time together
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am Posts: 13299 Location: Vienna
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: Shack wrote: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27145
Excel I'm completley with ya
The 3rd superhero film curse feels mighty strong with this one. Both you and Excel need to lay off the pipe.. I can't imagine for 1 minute WHY this movie would suck and as a matter of fact, I predict after this, Sam Raimi will be the King of Director's when it comes to comicbook franchises for having not only 2 highly successful movie's in the series at over a Billion dollars, but the 3rd one will be the charm.. Every post I've read about the trailer being with "300" said it was excellent, especially when the claws reached down and pulled Spiderman up.. I haven't seen 300 now, but can anyone confirm this??? Also at 156 minutes running time, Raimi seems to be wanting to tie alot of things up which is good cause bitter negative fanboys complained it wouldn't be long enough..
Where have you read that the movie is 156 minutes long??
BTW; This is easily my most anticipated movie for this year and I think it's going to be great.
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:35 am |
|
 |
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm Posts: 25035 Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
CASINO_BKB wrote: BJ wrote: This is the first spidey film im not pumped for, advertising sucks. Im very disappointed, this is the first of the franchise I am not 100% anticipating. Ill be there opening day perhaps, but I dont think Im going to the midnight showing this time around. And I'm sure Sam Raimi will lose sleep knowing your not going to be at the Midnight show for this movie.. Oh no.. 
I doubt it, why whould he care what i think 
_________________The Force Awakens
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:37 pm |
|
 |
film-lover
Star Trek XI
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:26 am Posts: 382 Location: The Grind House
|
Excel, I laugh at you. This is almost as dumb as the time on BOF you created those "their fudging the numbers. Happy Feet will be number 1, not Apocalypto in the end" and "Happy Feet will gross more than Charlotte's Web this weekend" threads.
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:48 pm |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
boxofficelover wrote: Excel, I laugh at you. This is almost as dumb as the time on BOF you created those "their fudging the numbers. Happy Feet will be number 1, not Apocalypto in the end" and "Happy Feet will gross more than Charlotte's Web this weekend" threads.
Filmlover?
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:53 pm |
|
 |
Timayd
The 5th B-Sharp
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:48 am Posts: 1506
|
Gullimont wrote: boxofficelover wrote: Excel, I laugh at you. This is almost as dumb as the time on BOF you created those "their fudging the numbers. Happy Feet will be number 1, not Apocalypto in the end" and "Happy Feet will gross more than Charlotte's Web this weekend" threads. Filmlover?
Yeah BOF's down
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:57 pm |
|
 |
film-lover
Star Trek XI
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:26 am Posts: 382 Location: The Grind House
|
Gullimont wrote: boxofficelover wrote: Excel, I laugh at you. This is almost as dumb as the time on BOF you created those "their fudging the numbers. Happy Feet will be number 1, not Apocalypto in the end" and "Happy Feet will gross more than Charlotte's Web this weekend" threads. Filmlover?
That be me. 
|
Sun Mar 11, 2007 3:01 pm |
|
|