Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 6:37 am



Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Night at the Museum 

What grade would you give this film?
A 12%  12%  [ 3 ]
B 48%  48%  [ 12 ]
C 16%  16%  [ 4 ]
D 20%  20%  [ 5 ]
F 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 25

 Night at the Museum 
Author Message
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post Night at the Museum
Night at the Museum

Image

Quote:
Night at the Museum is a 2006 fantasy adventure-comedy film based on the 1993 children's book with the same name by Milan Trenc. It follows a divorced father trying to settle down, impress his son, and find his destiny. He applies for a job as a night watchman at New York City's American Museum of Natural History and subsequently discovers that the exhibits, animated by a magical Egyptian artifact, come to life at night.

Released on December 22, 2006 by 20th Century Fox, which presented the 1492 Pictures/21 Laps Entertainment Production in association with Ingenious Film Partners, the film was written by Robert Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon of Comedy Central's Reno 911! and MTV's The State and produced and directed by Shawn Levy. Also producing for 1492 Pictures were Chris Columbus and Michael Barnathan. The cast includes Ben Stiller, Carla Gugino, Dick Van Dyke, Mickey Rooney, Bill Cobbs, Jake Cherry, Ricky Gervais, and Robin Williams. A new novelization of the screenplay by Leslie Goldman was published as a film tie-in.

A sequel titled Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian was released on May 22, 2009.


Last edited by Nebs on Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:04 pm
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
The movie had neat special effects (although you've seen most of them from the trailers), and while cute and amusing, wasn't very memorable. The only reason I remember the opening credits is because they blatantly rip off Panic Room's. Ben Stiller kept more of his dignity then in other endeavours, but that's not saying much at all. Either way, he wasn't very funny. Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan were the stand outs, great chemistry between those two. The script was a pretty big mess, and was desperately in need of a rewrite. It was inconsistent and had no problem using all the deus ex machinas in the world to solve whatever problem arose. Going ahead and having every inhabitant of the museum suddenly be able to understand everything Stiller says is lazy screenwriting enough. Having the pharoh be able to just get every single creature back into the museum by saying a few magic words... I was really shocked that was the best they could come up with. I still wish Stephen Sommers had directed this instead, Shawn Levy should stick to low-brow family comedies.
C+


Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:42 am
Profile
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5823
Post 
B+, fun movie that delivers exactly what it advertises. I didn't have any problem with the script, which requires as much a suspension of reality as most other adventure/fantasy films. Like other Ben Stiller movies, while he isn't a good comedian all alone by himself, he is hilarious when reacting to other people/animals around him. While the visual effects were fine, the sound-effects editing are top-notch and deserves awards consideration.


Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:32 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
The movie had neat special effects (although you've seen most of them from the trailers), and while cute and amusing, wasn't very memorable. The only reason I remember the opening credits is because they blatantly rip off Panic Room's. Ben Stiller kept more of his dignity then in other endeavours, but that's not saying much at all. Either way, he wasn't very funny. Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan were the stand outs, great chemistry between those two. The script was a pretty big mess, and was desperately in need of a rewrite. It was inconsistent and had no problem using all the deus ex machinas in the world to solve whatever problem arose. [spoil]Going ahead and having every inhabitant of the museum suddenly be able to understand everything Stiller says is lazy screenwriting enough. Having the pharoh be able to just get every single creature back into the museum by saying a few magic words... I was really shocked that was the best they could come up with. [/spoil]. I still wish Stephen Sommers had directed this instead, Shawn Levy should stick to low-brow family comedies.
C+


Yes! The screenplay was brimming with sloppiness. Character motivations and plot dynamics shifted throughout, obviously to provide exits from corners the film was written into.

Otherwise, I thought it was fairly enjoyable. B-.


Last edited by David on Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:51 pm, edited 3 times in total.



Sat Dec 23, 2006 12:28 am
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40541
Post 
My review for BOF:

In Night of the Museum, Ben Stiller plays Larry Daley, a divorced middle aged man who has gone through failure after failure, spending his life always attempting schemes to make it as something big, but never succeeding. After being freshly evicted, he finally settles for a fall-back job, for his 10-year old son. He ends up taking a job at a Museum of Natural History as a night guard, a seemingly safe and mellow position... seemingly. After receiving instructions from the trio of elderly workers who were employed previously to him, he begins his duty, at which point the surprise comes. The entire museum comes to life at night.

Night at the Museum is on occasion, a charming and enjoyable film to watch, particularily in the second half when the pace picks up dramatically. However, it has its fair share of problems, which end up hurting the film. Before it gets to the second half, it begins with an act displaying Larry's personal life, which is a nice attempt at humanizing this guy, but ends up being unbelievably stale and forgettable. A few years back Stiller branded himself forever as the king of silly with Zoolander, and later followed that up with Starsky & Hutch and Dodgeball among cameos in other Frat Pack comedies, but along with that, he has always tried to play sentimental roles as well, with Keep the Faith, Along Came Polly, Duplex, Envy, and now this. But the reality is, he's just not good at it, and he always seems to play the exact same character, and it never works. He bumbles, he fidgets, he trys his dorky thing, but he fails to show any emotional depth in the character or at all, he is completley bland in the role, and while he is not immediatley dislikable, he is forgettable along with every aspect of the character's personal life in the film.

The true highlights of Night at the Museum, and really its saving grace from being awful, are easily the toys, artifacts, and statues in the museum itself, brought to life absolutely splendidly with top notch CGI and visual effects. As well, not only in the visuals do they shine, but in the actors, there is a joy to the way the high-profile cast and other extras just have fun fooling around in their roles as figurines and statues around the museum. Owen Wilson as a miniature cowboy is as charasmatic as he has been, and Steve Coogan as his Roman general counterpart is no worse. Together they are able to form a formidable pair with great chemistry, both playing their time period roles strongly, they both bring life and depth to their characters, despite being toys on screen. But best of all is Robin Williams, who gives one of his best performances in recent years as the wax version of Teddy Roosevelt, he is surprisingly very good at showing both charm and heart in his guiding role. The rest of the artifacts in the museum including a fossilized T-Rex, an Easter Island statue, an Attila the Hun brought to life, and some fire craving cave men, are all entertaining and fun to watch run wild.

The film itself in particular, as mentioned, picks up a great amount steam and pace in the second half of the film, once it focuses on the artifacts' situation and the mission they end up taking, it seems to drop Stiller's character and focus and the pure fun. But that can't overcome the film's flaws, such as the blandness of the lead character, and without giving away too much, there are a few illogical holes dealing with the characters and their motivations in the film. Also Shawn Levy's direction is a bit weak, at times it seems he doesn't capture the beauty of the lively museum world enough, and he seems to paint the film in the same sentimental light of all others of its kind.

Night at the Museum is a decent way to pass the time, but nothing more.

B-/C+

...

Sigh, I need to practice reviews more, I'm a n00b... I couldn't put the flair I wanted to in that.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:01 am
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14623
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
I'd give this a solid B. I actually thought the first hour was the best, and in the second half it actually started going downhill. The revelation of the villains felt forced and unbelievable and the screenplay kind of fell apart after that as well. Nonetheless, this is quite a fun family film anchored by strong comedic performances from Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Steve Coogan and especially Robin Williams. I'd definitely recommend it. It's an entertaining time waster.


Sun Dec 24, 2006 3:17 am
Profile YIM
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
A big-budget, brilliantly-casted crappy Sunday afternoon TV movie.

Watching it, all I kept thinking was how good it would've been with a few more months spent on the script and a substantially better director. Imagine what it could have been with a plot that wasn't just a mish-mash of other family films and without Shawn Levy calling the shots?

Making Dick Van Dyke, Mickey Rooney and Bill Cobbs the villains was an awful decision. And the Liar Liar/Mrs Doubtfire broken family dynamic rip-off was incredibly lazy plotting. The cast was superb but badly used (Ricky Gervais in particular was awful - and why was Carla Gugino even in it? Her character serves absolutely no purpose.), about the only people who came off well were Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan - who, on this evidence, deserve their own film together.

D


Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:25 am
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Snrub wrote:
A big-budget, brilliantly-casted crappy Sunday afternoon TV movie.

Watching it, all I kept thinking was how good it would've been with a few more months spent on the script and a substantially better director. Imagine what it could have been with a plot that wasn't just a mish-mash of other family films and without Shawn Levy calling the shots?

Making Dick Van Dyke, Mickey Rooney and Bill Cobbs the villains was an awful decision. And the Liar Liar/Mrs Doubtfire broken family dynamic rip-off was incredibly lazy plotting. The cast was superb but badly used (Ricky Gervais in particular was awful - and why was Carla Gugino even in it? Her character serves absolutely no purpose.), about the only people who came off well were Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan - who, on this evidence, deserve their own film together.

D


Yeah, I still say Stephen Sommers should have directed this - if nothing else, it would have been much more entertaining.


Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:16 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
Snrub wrote:
A big-budget, brilliantly-casted crappy Sunday afternoon TV movie.

Watching it, all I kept thinking was how good it would've been with a few more months spent on the script and a substantially better director. Imagine what it could have been with a plot that wasn't just a mish-mash of other family films and without Shawn Levy calling the shots?

Making Dick Van Dyke, Mickey Rooney and Bill Cobbs the villains was an awful decision. And the Liar Liar/Mrs Doubtfire broken family dynamic rip-off was incredibly lazy plotting. The cast was superb but badly used (Ricky Gervais in particular was awful - and why was Carla Gugino even in it? Her character serves absolutely no purpose.), about the only people who came off well were Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan - who, on this evidence, deserve their own film together.

D


Yeah, I still say Stephen Sommers should have directed this - if nothing else, it would have been much more entertaining.


Screw Stephen Sommers (who I love - Deep Rising represent!). Imagine a Darabon-scripted Spielberg version? Or hell, even a John August-scripted Joe Johnston version. It's not that it's a bad film, it's that it could've been so much better.


Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:37 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
B+

Really enjoyed it. Was worried at first by other's comments, I'd advise to go in with a low expectation. They do show a lot of the stuff in the trailers, a large gripe. I thought Ben did a fantastic job, as well as Owen Wilson, who has a larger part than I thought he would.


Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:28 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post 
Carla Gugino was a complete waste (and she is one of my favorite actresses) and if you want to talk lazy script writing, the way they handled the resolution to the three old men plot line was stupid as hell and was shown during the damn credits!

Paul Rudd is setup as some sort of perfect/nerdy/yuppie foil to Ben Stiller and he just disappears midway through the film making me wonder why he was put in the film. Perhaps he was originally going to steal the pharaohs junk, but was written out and replaced with the three old men.

Anyway, C+. I'm sure I would have laughed more if I was perhaps 8-11 years old.


Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:06 pm
Profile WWW
Artie the One-Man Party

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm
Posts: 4632
Post 
A few things:

I 100% agree that the film is okay, but could have just been SO much better if handled by a more talented and able and visionary director; and the script is just TERRIBLE

-Totally forgot Paul Rudd was even in this film. He did disappear didn't he? The whole family set-up was pretty much dropped, why introduce the mother the step-father and so on? None of it had much effect on the ending

-Hated how DVD, Mickey Rooney, and Cobbs were used. A waste, and if Rooney called Stiller a totally unoffending name like 'lunchbox' or 'hotdog' one more time, I was going to walk out, just because it was really getting to me. Seriously.

-I liked Stiller, although it's a rehash of older characters he's played, he was still fun.

-Robin Williams, well, he was good, but I thought they'd have him in more of a funny type of role rather than as a mentor.

-Owen Wilson and Coogan were great, I want to see Coogan in more films.

-I actually liked Gervais, even though it obviously was a waste of talent. But the material there was shit and he did pretty well with it.

-I agree with I think Moviedude it was, about the damn resolution involving the Pharaoh. I just sat there and went, 'wait, did that ACTUALLY JUST HAPPEN?' (Mostly because there was about a minute where they all panic about how they were going to get things back in the mueseum, and I was anticipating a big funny scene where they try to lure them all back, and instead it took the extremely easy and boring way out...


Imagine the box-office prospects if this were actually the outstanding movie it could have been...(with perhaps a Spielberg involved)


Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:57 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
A very big fluffy thing that most kids will eat up.

As for me, pretty much all the actors are wasted up, Paul Rudd, ricky Gervais, and even Robin Williams, though he was actually endearing rather than real funny here.

Owen Wilson was hysterical, and suprisingly Mickey Rooney is still entertaining. But man, there is nothing that you wouldnt expect, happy ending, noone dies, everyone makes up in the end.

A throwaway piece that really needs no more viewings, but allright to watch once. Stiller at least held it together.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:15 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
Thegun wrote:
A very big fluffy thing that most kids will eat up.

As for me, pretty much all the actors are wasted up, Paul Rudd, ricky Gervais, and even Robin Williams, though he was actually endearing rather than real funny here.

Owen Wilson was hysterical, and suprisingly Mickey Rooney is still entertaining. But man, there is nothing that you wouldnt expect, happy ending, noone dies, everyone makes up in the end.

A throwaway piece that really needs no more viewings, but allright to watch once. Stiller at least held it together.

The caveman suffered a grisly sand fate... one of the few things that caught me off guard in the movie, was very quick instead of making it dramatic.


Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:23 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
Thegun wrote:
A very big fluffy thing that most kids will eat up.

As for me, pretty much all the actors are wasted up, Paul Rudd, ricky Gervais, and even Robin Williams, though he was actually endearing rather than real funny here.

Owen Wilson was hysterical, and suprisingly Mickey Rooney is still entertaining. But man, there is nothing that you wouldnt expect, happy ending, noone dies, everyone makes up in the end.

A throwaway piece that really needs no more viewings, but allright to watch once. Stiller at least held it together.

The caveman suffered a grisly sand fate... one of the few things that caught me off guard in the movie, was very quick instead of making it dramatic.


Aha, I did forget about that, which confused me for the longest time, I though Roosevelt said that if one of them was left outside, they would all turn to dust?

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:08 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Thegun wrote:
MG Casey wrote:
Thegun wrote:
A very big fluffy thing that most kids will eat up.

As for me, pretty much all the actors are wasted up, Paul Rudd, ricky Gervais, and even Robin Williams, though he was actually endearing rather than real funny here.

Owen Wilson was hysterical, and suprisingly Mickey Rooney is still entertaining. But man, there is nothing that you wouldnt expect, happy ending, noone dies, everyone makes up in the end.

A throwaway piece that really needs no more viewings, but allright to watch once. Stiller at least held it together.

The caveman suffered a grisly sand fate... one of the few things that caught me off guard in the movie, was very quick instead of making it dramatic.


Aha, I did forget about that, which confused me for the longest time, I though Roosevelt said that if one of them was left outside, they would all turn to dust?


I could've sworn I heard him say that too. I put it down to me not paying attention.

Also, did anyone else find it odd that Ricky Gervais was more angry about the all the foam in the caveman exhibit than he was the fact one of the cavemen had gone missing? Or that he fired Ben Stiller for the antics on the news rather than for the damage done to the museum (i.e., smashing the glass in the indian girl exhibit). Lazy, lazy, lazy film making.


Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:27 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
Snrub wrote:
Also, did anyone else find it odd that Ricky Gervais was more angry about the all the foam in the caveman exhibit than he was the fact one of the cavemen had gone missing? Or that he fired Ben Stiller for the antics on the news rather than for the damage done to the museum (i.e., smashing the glass in the indian girl exhibit). Lazy, lazy, lazy film making.

This really bothered me too!! I thought him losing a piece in the museum was going to be a big deal but apparently cavemen costumes are a dime a dozen.


Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:51 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
There were definitely a lot of holes in the film. Did anyone else notice the very small Charlie Murphy role as the cab driver. The whole Dust theory, caveman, Paul Rudd, Pharoah. It hurts the head.

Really though, Steve Coogan and Owen Wilson were great in the movie, I would have loved a spinoff movie just featuring them as two small toys, an Indian in the Cupbord type of remake. and Coogan was in the Indian in the Cupboard.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:49 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Thegun wrote:
There were definitely a lot of holes in the film. Did anyone else notice the very small Charlie Murphy role as the cab driver. The whole Dust theory, caveman, Paul Rudd, Pharoah. It hurts the head.

Really though, Steve Coogan and Owen Wilson were great in the movie, I would have loved a spinoff movie just featuring them as two small toys, an Indian in the Cupbord type of remake. and Coogan was in the Indian in the Cupboard.


Paul Rudd is essentially Cary Elwes's character in Liar Liar. Only not funny.


Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:52 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Oh Wow, neat gift dad!

Thanks Son!

They had a fun little comradery in Liar Liar. I miss Carey Elwes, he used to be so funny. Princess Bride, Hot Shots, Robin Hood

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:11 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post 
This one's strictly by the numbers - perhaps just like that instruction list Stiller was supposed to be following...

Yawn... though it might have been a serviceable kid's movie if they'd chopped off the first half hour and just gotten straight to the fun. The most irritating part, was when Robin Williams let us know that he was aware he was just a mannequin - what kinda idiot wrote that?

2 out of 5.


{PS: I did enjoy that Stiller-monkey slap fight! -- "Who's evolved?, Who's evolved?" :tongue: }


Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:12 am
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post 
Great Premise but horribly executed when be how I'd describe this. Like the rest of you I was really bothered by the gaping plotholes on display and who knew exibits running amok in a museum could be shown in such a way as to bore me after 10 minutes. Coogan and Wilson are the only people who get out of this mess with any praise.

D

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:49 am
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:36 pm
Posts: 1555
Post 
Plot wise, the movie was pretty bad. Making the three old men the villains, on the conclusion of their storyline, was just ridiculous. There were so many holes in the movie, too, that can be hard to get past. His last night in the museum, when all the exhibits run amok, everything is completely destroyed. It's sunrise when the exhibits finally return to their showcases, and Stiller has yet to begin to clean the museum. Somehow, however, when they show the museum goers pouring in in the morning, the museum is in perfect shape. Plus, the museum director never even NOTICES that the third caveman is missing.

Despite all that, however, the movie was really amusing. I saw it with my friend and we were cracking up at various parts. Anything with Owen Wilson was especially funny. It's a pointless movie and makes little to no sense, but it makes you laugh, and for that, I really did enjoy it.

B-


Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:59 pm
Profile WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Wow, what a total surprise.

Absolutely, one of the worst movies I have ever seen! The last five minutes really clinched it for me. The dancing... the mingling... the horror. I just can't believe how bad this movie is.

To be honest, this deserves an F. I think it's actually worse than Date Movie, which was the worst movie of the year for me up until today, but some of the special effects are good. Not amazing, but good.

D-

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:06 pm
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 198
Post 
B.

A Night at the Museum

Robin Williams reprises his role as a sensitive homosexual in this unexpected and baffling sequel to The Night Listener.

No, just kidding. Not bad, fairly funny in parts, fairly predictable and sugary in others. The plot wasn't a strong point. The exhibits weren't the only ones to get "new life," eh? They didn't get "new life", they came to life. You can't phrase it in a weird way to suit the plot. Still, I loved the remote-controlled car explosion and the scene where they let the tires down. Owen Wilson and even Ricky Gervais were quite funny.

Disposable, but at least I wasn't bored. A reasonable way to waste an afternoon.


Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:50 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.