Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 4:12 am



Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
 Thunderball 

What grade would you give this film?
A 29%  29%  [ 2 ]
B 57%  57%  [ 4 ]
C 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 7

 Thunderball 
Author Message
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68359
Post Thunderball
Image

Quote:
Thunderball (1965) is the fourth spy film in the James Bond series after Dr. No (1962), From Russia with Love (1963) and Goldfinger (1964), and the fourth to star Sean Connery as the fictional MI6 agent James Bond. It is an adaptation of the novel of the same name by Ian Fleming, which in turn was based on an original screenplay by Jack Whittingham. It was directed by Terence Young with screenplay by Richard Maibaum and John Hopkins.

The film follows Bond's mission to find two NATO atomic bombs stolen by SPECTRE, which holds the world ransom for £100 million in diamonds, in exchange for not destroying an unspecified major city in either England or the United States (later revealed to be Miami). The search leads Bond to the Bahamas, where he encounters Emilio Largo, the card-playing, eye-patch wearing SPECTRE Number Two. Backed by the CIA and Largo's mistress, Bond's search culminates in an underwater battle with Largo's henchmen. The film had a complex production, with four different units and about a quarter of the film consisting of underwater scenes.

Thunderball was associated with a legal dispute in 1961 when former Ian Fleming collaborators Kevin McClory and Jack Whittingham sued him shortly after the 1961 publication of the Thunderball novel, claiming he based it upon the screenplay the trio had earlier written in a failed cinematic translation of James Bond. The lawsuit was settled out of court and Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman, fearing a rival McClory film, allowed him to retain certain screen rights to the novel's story, plot, and characters.

The film was a success, earning a total of $141.2 million worldwide, exceeding the earnings of the three previous Bond films and breaking box office records on the first weekend of opening in France and Italy. In 1966, John Stears won the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects and production designer Ken Adam was also nominated for a BAFTA award. Thunderball is, to date, the most financially successful movie of the series, and, adjusting for inflation, made the equivalent of $966.4 million in 2008 currency. Some critics and viewers showered praise on the film and branded it a welcome addition to the series, while others complained of the repetitively monotonous aquatic action and prolonged length. In 1983, Warner Brothers released a second film adaptation of the novel under the title Never Say Never Again.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:39 pm
Profile WWW
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Fiona Volpe might be my favorite Bond girl of all time. Yummy!

I never get tired of this one.

A


Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:22 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
Fantastic movie. The action scenes, especially the underwater sequences are briiliant for a movie made in 1965.

A+

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:43 pm
Profile WWW
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
Not a huge fan. I have trouble sitting through this one, though I like the underwater scenes. The scenery wasn't as sweeping for the most part. My least favorite Connery bond (unless we count Never Say Never Again)

B-/C+


Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:20 pm
Profile
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
It works for me up till a certain point. In the last half hour the film becomes tedious and boring. That saying, the first two hours or so more than make up for it. I'd say this was Connery's last great outing as Bond.

A-

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:42 am
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
A big step down from the previous two in the series. Connery is great, as always, but the story is mishandled and the supporting characters are mostly weak. It also suffers from some of the worst editing I've ever seen in a major motion picture. Some scenes are completely out of order, characters appear and disappear, and huge leaps of logic are made in the plot. Other than the bad Bond girl, there isn't a single intriguing character - other than Bond himself, of course - and the villain isn't especially threatening. Still, the action scenes are terrific, especially the underwater scenes, even though this was the beginning of gadget overload in the series (ex. the jet pack). It's a deeply flawed film but still fun to watch.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Last edited by trixster on Thu Nov 06, 2008 1:22 am, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:57 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
Not as good as Goldfinger, but entertaining enough. I thought the underwater battle at the end was just a little too long.
My grade: B+.


Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:09 pm
Profile WWW
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Thunderball
Let's just cut right to the chase with this one. As pretty as it is to look at, there's way too much underwater footage. I think I read somewhere that 1/4 of the film uses underwater footage. That's just too much. That's not to say that all of it is bad though. The climax of the film doesn't really work though. We've got two armies fighting each other underwater and yet everything.....just.....moves.....so.....slowly. I think that could be the reason why Peter Hunt (the editor) chose to speed up the film and make quick cuts. Well, that doesn't exactly work out well either. It becomes too distracting in the end. The last 30 seconds of the film though when Bond and Domino are on the raft is just pure James Bond.

Yet despite my complaints I still like the film thanks to Connery. And Claudine Auger as Domino is certainly easy on the eyes. And most of the film is good. But compare it to the three films that came before, and it's a step down. It just needed to spend a little more time out of the water.

***

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:58 am
Profile WWW
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11616
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: Thunderball
In my personal opinion, this over Goldfinger is the quintessential Bond due to its plot

A

_________________
Image


Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:20 pm
Profile
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Thunderball
Jmart wrote:
Let's just cut right to the chase with this one. As pretty as it is to look at, there's way too much underwater footage. I think I read somewhere that 1/4 of the film uses underwater footage. That's just too much. That's not to say that all of it is bad though. The climax of the film doesn't really work though. We've got two armies fighting each other underwater and yet everything.....just.....moves.....so.....slowly. I think that could be the reason why Peter Hunt (the editor) chose to speed up the film and make quick cuts. Well, that doesn't exactly work out well either. It becomes too distracting in the end. The last 30 seconds of the film though when Bond and Domino are on the raft is just pure James Bond.

Yet despite my complaints I still like the film thanks to Connery. And Claudine Auger as Domino is certainly easy on the eyes. And most of the film is good. But compare it to the three films that came before, and it's a step down. It just needed to spend a little more time out of the water.

***


Yeah, my opinion didn't really change on this one. The only thing I have to add is this is what sometimes happens with excess. Thunderball apparently had the budget of the previous three films combined. Yet it does very little with it. We get underwater scenes that go...on....forever.....and.....ever, and the plot just meanders there in the middle.

Yet as I said before, it's still fun.

*** (B)

1. Goldfinger (1964) - ***** (A+)
2. From Russia with Love (1963) - ****½ (A)
3. Thunderball (1965) - *** (B)
4. Dr. No (1962) - *** (B)

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:41 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: Thunderball
Thunderball is one of the biggest hits and most popular Bond films...

I think this is a very nice to watch film with great locals and pretty women in all directions.

The storyline is pretty grand and the underwater scenes are pretty cool at FIRST..

The film is pulled down by the water scenes going on far far too long.
Even, so I like this and Goldfinger the most of the older Bond films.

B+

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:56 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68359
Post Re: Thunderball
I prefer Never Say Never Again.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:37 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.