Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:20 pm



Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
 Down in the Valley 

What grade would you give this film?
A 33%  33%  [ 1 ]
B 33%  33%  [ 1 ]
C 33%  33%  [ 1 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 3

 Down in the Valley 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Down in the Valley
Down in the Valley

Image

Quote:
Down in the Valley is a movie starring Edward Norton, Evan Rachel Wood, David Morse and Rory Culkin. The film made its debut in the Un Certain Regard section at the 2005 Cannes Film Festival on May 13, and made its limited theatrical release in North America in May 2006.


Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:27 pm
Profile
Teenage Dream

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
Post 
This is a tough one to grade. The first hour and a half are staggering in their brilliance. The films loses it's way during the final act, though, when it stops being a deeply disturbing and haunting character study and degenerates into a series of strange, surreal shoot out scenes. The direction and performances are absolutely sublime throughout, so it's a shame they both had to be letdown by a weak screenplay at the end. Edward Norton proves once again why he is probably this generation's greatest actor, as he is able to make our opinion of his character change on a dime without losing our total sympathy. Evan Rachel Wood is absoluely stunning here, too. I was expecting her to fall into the archetype character she portrayed in Thirteen yet again, but she displays an amazing amount of depth here. She also has somes incredibly brave (and extremely intense) sex scenes with Norton. Perhaps the best (and biggest surprise) performance, though, is given by David Morse, who plays Wood's father. Rory Culkin also shows the talent he dispalyed in Signs was no fluke, as he is great here aswell. This is easily the best ensemble of the year.

The director, David Jacobson, displays a strikingly poetic eye. The film is littered with beautiful images that will haunt you for days. Malick was a very clear and obvious influence, especially his work on Badlands. It's a shame that Jacobson's screenplay is not on par with his films visuals. It continously lets the character's down in the final twenty minutes, and it's the one thing that prevents the film from becoming an out and out masterpiece. I would love to see a different version of this film that remains quite and heartbroken throughout it's run time.

With that said, the climax isn't a complete unmitigated disaster, as it still has surreal visuals (the sequence in the completely dark forest is particularly striking) and smart commentary to bring to the table. Still, it's frustrating to know as a filmgoer that I was so close to a flawless film going experience, only to be letdown in the end.

Down In The Valley rates as an A-.

BTW - The best soundtrack of the year, easily. Peter Salett is a genius. The music compliments the visuals on screen to an extent I don't think I've ever seen. If you're a fan of alt-country/indie rock, check it out.


Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:49 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
makeshift is pretty much on the money with his review i'd say. The film kinda lost me at the end, the hour and a half before that was just great though.

Grade - B+

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:50 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
The film had potential but fell apart the longer it went. Edward Norton is a good actor, but he really needs to do something lighter occasionally. Did anyone else notice Norton's constantly changing facial hair? My grade: C+.


Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:15 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8626
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
This was a good movie that completely fell apart in it's third act. It was really out there, and just got annoying to watch. Before the last half hour, my grade was a 9/10 (A-). Evan Rachel Wood was great as always, and what happened to her character was disappointing since her performance was really so great. Recommended.

7/10 ( B )

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:58 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.