| Author |
Message |
|
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
 James Bond sequel planned for 2-007 Originally posted at femalefirst.co.uk (!), but linked from CommanderBond.net:
Quote: ames Bond bosses want to release the sequel to new movie 'Casino Royale' next year - because the date ends in 007. Producers are keen to take advantage of the numerical significance with the suave spy's special agent number and want to start work on the project as soon as shooting has finished on the current film. A source told Britain's Daily Express newspaper: "The next one will be in 2007 - Bond's year. It will mean back-to-back shooting but then the next film will pick up where 'Casino Royale' leaves off anyway." However, the decision will mean new Bond Daniel Craig will not have a break between movies and will have to juggle promotional commitments for 'Casino Royale' with filming. Since Craig was announced as the latest actor to don the secret agent's famous tuxedo he has faced a barrage of criticism. Some angry fans of the franchise even started an online petition, found on website http://www.craignotbond.com, urging movie goers to boycott the new film.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 1:56 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa
I think everyone involved understood how significant 2007 was, it's probably been on the forefront of their marketing strat since 1995 or earlier.
But back to back films with an unproven Bond. Not to mention an apparent series story arc?
god no. NO NO NO.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:01 pm |
|
|
|
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Look what terror The Omen has wrought! Damn you, 6-6-06, DAMN YOU.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:05 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hmmmmm, it is very risky, but it could pay off.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:06 pm |
|
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21634
Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Since the new one is coming out in late 2006, they might as well just push the release dat a couple of months to 2007. I know the Bond films used to be released a year apart, but that was grueling for Connery even when the productions were shorter. I think Craig will do good, but I think they should just push back the new one than rushing a 2nd on into production, especially if this one is suppose to be very good anyhow
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:07 pm |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
I feel confident in Casino Royale after that teaser, but it's really a risk to take on a second Bond within one year with an actor that hasn't proven that he can be a good Bond.
Despite the '2007' release date, if people don't accept Craig in Casino Royale, this might not do well.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:10 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
Not to mention, SMERSH, SPECTRE, and key characters aside, 007 films are stand alone.
As interesting as it would be for Pierce's Bond to talk about how hot Bambi and Thumper were, there just isnt any spill over story wise.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:17 pm |
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
loyal, you just dont understand bond.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:18 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
bABA wrote: loyal, you just dont understand bond. clearly
(goes back to staring at 007 tattoo.)
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 2:54 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: bABA wrote: loyal, you just dont understand bond. clearly (goes back to staring at 007 tattoo.) You mean the lame 007 on your arm?  _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 4:45 pm |
|
|
|
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Not to mention, SMERSH, SPECTRE, and key characters aside, 007 films are stand alone. This is true, but the series needs a blood transfusion. Deviating from the age-old formula is a good start. If the news is true, I think a story arc is a good thing.
_________________
k
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 4:58 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
oh no you didn't Munky
oh my god, I just realized you can see my nuts
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 4:59 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
OMG loyal   _________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 5:03 pm |
|
|
|
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
|
hehehe nuts....
So its true what they say about brown people.... 
Last edited by zennier on Thu May 04, 2006 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 5:04 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
seriously, they're huge.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: seriously, they're huge. Indeed 
or not. ill give you the benefit of the doubt: it was cold out
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 5:06 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
lennier wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: seriously, they're huge. Indeed or not. ill give you the benefit of the doubt: it was cold outI changed my avatar to that of the crying baby wearing a wig.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 5:08 pm |
|
|
|
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
|
Aww, hehe, sorry to offend "little" Loyal......
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 5:23 pm |
|
|
|
DP07
Homo Dperious
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 14474
Location: Everywhere
|
It might be a bit risky, but I'm now getting the feeling that people are underestimating Casino Royale. I'm not worried.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 7:26 pm |
|
|
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
|
If this was on their radar, why didn't they just push Casino Royale to 2007? It would have made more sense then trying to do back-to-back Bonds. If they had delayed Casino Royale a year, they would have got the double whammy of having both Fleming's first book back in movie form and 2-007. Plus the new Bond. Hell, if they had pushed it back a year, maybe they could have found a better Bond.  It just doesn't make sense to have another Bond movie next year. It'll do really poorly. _________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 8:34 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
|
why dont they just push casino royale back...its being rusched anyways.-till like, febuary 2007...it would amek the same...140-150 million dolar gross and would hit at a rather unsuspecting time.
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 11:16 pm |
|
|
|
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
|
Re: James Bond sequel planned for 2-007 The Dark Shape wrote: Originally posted at femalefirst.co.uk (!), but linked from CommanderBond.net: Quote: ames Bond bosses want to release the sequel to new movie 'Casino Royale' next year - because the date ends in 007. Producers are keen to take advantage of the numerical significance with the suave spy's special agent number and want to start work on the project as soon as shooting has finished on the current film. A source told Britain's Daily Express newspaper: "The next one will be in 2007 - Bond's year. It will mean back-to-back shooting but then the next film will pick up where 'Casino Royale' leaves off anyway." However, the decision will mean new Bond Daniel Craig will not have a break between movies and will have to juggle promotional commitments for 'Casino Royale' with filming. Since Craig was announced as the latest actor to don the secret agent's famous tuxedo he has faced a barrage of criticism. Some angry fans of the franchise even started an online petition, found on website http://www.craignotbond.com, urging movie goers to boycott the new film. 
|
| Thu May 04, 2006 11:18 pm |
|
|
