Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 5:56 pm



Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 The Simpsons Movie 

What grade would you give this film?
A 52%  52%  [ 32 ]
B 31%  31%  [ 19 ]
C 13%  13%  [ 8 ]
D 3%  3%  [ 2 ]
F 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 62

 The Simpsons Movie 
Author Message
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post 
Gullimont wrote:
Thegun wrote:
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
s snack wrote:
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
Pretty good -- about the same funny/filler ratio as the show nowadays. Too long though, they coulda tightened it up by about 15 minutes and gotten rid of some of the mushy stuff. I still watch every new episode on Sunday nights, and I would say it's worth seeing for the fans...

3 out of 5.

15 minutes off and it would have been an hour long. I thought it needed 15 minutes more to feel more like a movie actually.

An hour woulda been just about right, imho -- that's three episodes long, which still woulda been a challenge for the writers to sustain -- I'm a believer in movie length suiting the material (I don't have a problem with paying full price for a 60 minute film, though I know some people would)...


I Loved the movie, and felt the "Mushy" stuff is what brought it to another level.


Yes a "oh God they have run out of idea's and are re-cycling the same repetitive nonsense" level.

That stuff doesn't work when Homer has become a stupid pastiche of himself.

I agree. Back in the best of the shows, the sentimentality that often closed each episode was honest, character-driven, and meaningful.

(But -- Hey! -- I still liked it, I laughed, I gave it 3 out of 5 for goodness sakes!)


Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:22 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
I don't see where the raves are coming from. It's a good movie, and I'm as glad it didn't suck as everyone else, but there are hardly any belly-laughs, the supporting characters might as well not be in the movie and it still has too many of the crappy Family Guy-type jokes that have been plaguing the last several seasons. Still, there are so many jokes period that there was hardly a time I wasn't giggling, and I'm glad it was made.

If there's a sequel, they should call up Conan and kick out Maxtone-Graham and Scully.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:20 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11582
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post 
Sun Ra wrote:

If there's a sequel, they should call up Conan and kick out Maxtone-Graham and Scully.


A sequel will probably be much better. And my dream sequel would be directed by Brad Bird.

_________________
Image


Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:17 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21856
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
I'd love a sequel to bring back some characters from the school and of course Mr. Burns and the Power plant.

I'd love something as eventful as Who Shot Mr. Burns on the big screen. Another type of huge mystery would be awesome.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:27 pm
Profile
life begins now
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post 
AgentX wrote:
It was shortly after the credits started and it had Mr. Burns asking Smithers if he would commit suicide because Mr. Burns might find it funny.

'You know I don't believe in suicide, but would you do it Smithers? I think it would be funny to watch'

It's not exactly that, but it's along those lines. I'll have to see it again to get the exact wording down.


Haha...I loved that.

The movie was great, something I didn't expect even two weeks ago. It wasn't a masterpiece by any means, but it was more than I could have hoped for.

A-


Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:29 pm
Profile YIM
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11582
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post 
This one was hilarious, but it didn't dwell on the human drama as well.

_________________
Image


Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:47 pm
Profile
The 5th B-Sharp
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:48 am
Posts: 1506
Post 
Sun Ra wrote:
I don't see where the raves are coming from. It's a good movie, and I'm as glad it didn't suck as everyone else, but there are hardly any belly-laughs, the supporting characters might as well not be in the movie and it still has too many of the crappy Family Guy-type jokes that have been plaguing the last several seasons. Still, there are so many jokes period that there was hardly a time I wasn't giggling, and I'm glad it was made.

If there's a sequel, they should call up Conan and kick out Maxtone-Graham and Scully.



No way kick out Jean and Scully, Maxtone-Graham and Selman are the only good writers left.


Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:49 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
Eh, I think we can all agree on getting Conan for the next one, though. He wrote some of the very best episodes in the series (Marge Vs. The Monorail, Homer Goes To College), though admittedly, his tenure was really brief.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:09 pm
Profile
The 5th B-Sharp
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:48 am
Posts: 1506
Post 
Sun Ra wrote:
Eh, I think we can all agree on getting Conan for the next one, though. He wrote some of the very best episodes in the series (Marge Vs. The Monorail, Homer Goes To College), though admittedly, his tenure was really brief.



Yes but honestly Conan if he accepted would have very little time on writing it.


Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:14 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 19368
Location: San Diego
Post 
Somewhat forgettable, but I think it's the most fun (along with Hairspray) I've had in theatres this year. The movie goes by really quickly, but it's overall satisfying, both in humor and story. [though, not completely satisfying]

A strong B+/A-, I hope it holds up on a 2nd viewing.


Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:17 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
What about Greg Daniels then? Hell, even Larry Doyle.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:43 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11582
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post 
If Brad Bird was given the job I would expect a Sideshow Bob or Krutsy the Clown-esque story about individualism and the terrony of society, can't go wrong with that.

_________________
Image


Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:46 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21856
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
The Thing about Conan and many of the earlier writers. Its not like they each wrote an episode entirely, it was a collective group that many ideas were used throughout, whoever came up with the stories usually got the credit for the episode, but Conan was supposedly a joke magnet like many of the others.

I mean David Silverman was arguably the best director of the show, he had a knack for how things should look on screen. 11 writers wrote the movie remember. Conan could help, but it would still be a highly collective film. Then again, when Conan returned in 2002 the ep he wrote wasn't that memorable if I remember correctly.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:49 am
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11582
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post 
Nope Brad Bird was the best.

_________________
Image


Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:08 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21856
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Darth Indiana Bond wrote:
Nope Brad Bird was the best.


I don't see all the love for Brad Bird, he was more of a producer on the show then anything

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:31 am
Profile
The 5th B-Sharp
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:48 am
Posts: 1506
Post 
Darth Indiana Bond wrote:
Nope Brad Bird was the best.


Brad Bird is a great director, but his tenure on The Simpsons was much too brief to be consider the best. He only directed 2 episodes
Krusty gets Busted and
Like Father, like clown
good episodes but nothing really special to consider him the best after two episodes.


Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:12 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Thegun wrote:
Darth Indiana Bond wrote:
Nope Brad Bird was the best.


I don't see all the love for Brad Bird, he was more of a producer on the show then anything



All this talk about Bird has more to do with The Iron Giant, The Incredibles and Ratatouille than with The Simpsons.


Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:23 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
Image

Not good but not really awful either. I'm not an active watcher of the show, though I do enjoy watching it once in awhile. I didn't think this was that funny and I only chuckled a few times. It seemed a lot longer than 85 minutes too. :p I couldn't wait for it to be over. Still, it was slightly entertaining at times and overall it was just alright.

6/10 (C+)

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:20 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Squee

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm
Posts: 13270
Location: Yuppieville
Post 
movies35 wrote:
Image



I shall bring up another point...

Remember when crowds in The Simpsons used to have people you DIDN'T know? Characters that haven't shown up in the show before?

Im sorry, but Bumblebee Man doesnt have to be i every crowd, dressed like Bumblebee Man. (though somehow he isnt in this picture, oddly enough).

I think it's just another bad mark on The Simpsons creativity.

_________________
Setting most people on fire is wrong.
Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee."

:glare:


Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:53 pm
Profile
2.71828183

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: please delete me
Post 
Mr. Burns had the best scenes in the film, it was very meh for me. I sort of laughed, otehr times i kind of smiled, but I jst recall things like Who Shot MOnty Burns that were a thousand times funny and more clever then this.

Homer has lost alot as a character for me.

its ok, I wouldn't reccommend to anyoen that the rush out and see it in the theater.


Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:35 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21856
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
SqueezeMePlease? wrote:
movies35 wrote:
Image



I shall bring up another point...

Remember when crowds in The Simpsons used to have people you DIDN'T know? Characters that haven't shown up in the show before?

Im sorry, but Bumblebee Man doesnt have to be i every crowd, dressed like Bumblebee Man. (though somehow he isnt in this picture, oddly enough).

I think it's just another bad mark on The Simpsons creativity.


There was plenty of people in the crowd that were never seen before. No really new characters introduced apart from the villain, Tom Hanks, and Schwarzenegger, but there were many new ones out there.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:58 pm
Profile
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post 
What's the deal with Schwarzenegger? Why no Rainier Wolfcastle?

_________________
---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--


Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:51 pm
Profile WWW
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post 
Nebs wrote:
What's the deal with Schwarzenegger? Why no Rainier Wolfcastle?


More pointless celebrity nods of course!


Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:54 pm
Profile
Squee

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm
Posts: 13270
Location: Yuppieville
Post 
Gullimont wrote:
Nebs wrote:
What's the deal with Schwarzenegger? Why no Rainier Wolfcastle?


More pointless celebrity nods of course!


But Rainier Wolfcastle IS the celebrity nod.

I don't get it either. They are the SAME PERSON! Why isnt it Ranier Wolfcastle? Is Rainier even in the movie? Does he make an appearence for the sake of a joke?

_________________
Setting most people on fire is wrong.
Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee."

:glare:


Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:57 pm
Profile
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post 
He might be in a movie somewhere, but I haven't noticed him.

_________________
---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--


Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:12 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.