Author |
Message |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
 Saw IV gets NC-17
Obviously it'll be appealed, but interesting indeed.
Quote: I know a lot of you schmoes are over the SAW series, but I'm still so totally there. Still, I don't really know how to take the news that the impending bloodfest, SAW IV has been given a NC-17 rating by the MPAA. Still, as is speculated the creative team behind the movie may still go back and make the cuts required to earn their hard R-rating.
http://www.joblo.com/saw-iv-gets-nc-17
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:11 am |
|
 |
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm Posts: 8202
|
 Re: Saw IV gets NC-17
Zingaling wrote: Obviously it'll be appealed, but interesting indeed. Quote: I know a lot of you schmoes are over the SAW series, but I'm still so totally there. Still, I don't really know how to take the news that the impending bloodfest, SAW IV has been given a NC-17 rating by the MPAA. Still, as is speculated the creative team behind the movie may still go back and make the cuts required to earn their hard R-rating. http://www.joblo.com/saw-iv-gets-nc-17
all their movies get NC-17 and then they have to edit stuff to bring it down to R.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:15 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Where do they go from #3? Theres probably some testicle and penis rippage in this one.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:20 am |
|
 |
Timayd
The 5th B-Sharp
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:48 am Posts: 1506
|
El Pollo Loco wrote: Where do they go from #3? Theres probably some testicle and penis rippage in this one.
There was some in Hostel Part 2, it was short but it still got an R.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:40 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
They should keep it, it'd get a whole lot of buzz if it did, at least double what it would otherwise. And most of the audience is over 17 anyway. And the NC-17 rating needs a movie that can show that the rating isn't poison.
They'll certainly appeal it though.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:47 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
Positive* Jon wrote: They should keep it, it'd get a whole lot of buzz if it did, at least double what it would otherwise. And most of the audience is over 17 anyway. And the NC-17 rating needs a movie that can show that the rating isn't poison.
They'll certainly appeal it though.
Studios usually won't market or release an NC-17 film, that's why the rating is seen as the death knoll for any film.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:46 am |
|
 |
Timayd
The 5th B-Sharp
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:48 am Posts: 1506
|
trixster wrote: Positive* Jon wrote: They should keep it, it'd get a whole lot of buzz if it did, at least double what it would otherwise. And most of the audience is over 17 anyway. And the NC-17 rating needs a movie that can show that the rating isn't poison.
They'll certainly appeal it though. Studios usually won't market or release an NC-17 film, that's why the rating is seen as the death knoll for any film.
and some theater chains may not carry it with the rating.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:55 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
The R rating has become almost useless when it comes to informing a person of a films content.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:05 am |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
these films are terrible and i don't see how people can watch them.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:49 am |
|
 |
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm Posts: 8202
|
Mannyisthebest wrote: these films are terrible and i don't see how people can watch them.
My freind who loves such films says "It makes you want to eat more after watching the movie becasue your stomach feels empty"
moron.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:14 pm |
|
 |
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am Posts: 12119 Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Yeah, it got an NC-17. Just like the last three did. There's no way it's going out without an R rating.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:57 pm |
|
 |
coolmoviedude999
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:20 pm Posts: 1108
|
This is probably a publicity stunt to gain attention. The "come see Saw 4 because it's so shocking" shtick. A little bizarre this news breaks during Comic Con; also, with the questionable "toture-porn" cloud over the film this year and the audience starting to shift. We're basically heading for a new trend in horror.
A resurrection of the slasher maybe (seems to happen once every decade)? Maybe anthology/creepshow/ghostly type horror? In any matter (no matter what it is), there is going to be a shift, and it's going to start to happen within the year.
As far as the rating goes... This rating will never stick. I've been super shocked before, but I highly doubt it.
I still stick with my prediction. Saw 4 will do well, and then Saw is over... and out... Saw 5 will see the massive drop, and that will either be the end of it, or it will be limited in its audience.
I'm sticking with that, and if I'm wrong, oh well. Not the end of the world. I'm ready for new trends myself, because, honestly, I didn't much care for the old ones these last years. Creepy Chinese girls and tied up ice cube women just didn't do much for me.
_________________ 99.7% of the people involved in air and auto accidents ate bread within 6 months preceding the accident.
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:17 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23385 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
coolmoviedude999 wrote: This is probably a publicity stunt to gain attention. The "come see Saw 4 because it's so shocking" shtick. A little bizarre this news breaks during Comic Con; also, with the questionable "toture-porn" cloud over the film this year and the audience starting to shift. We're basically heading for a new trend in horror.
A resurrection of the slasher maybe (seems to happen once every decade)? Maybe anthology/creepshow/ghostly type horror? In any matter (no matter what it is), there is going to be a shift, and it's going to start to happen within the year.
As far as the rating goes... This rating will never stick. I've been super shocked before, but I highly doubt it.
I still stick with my prediction. Saw 4 will do well, and then Saw is over... and out... Saw 5 will see the massive drop, and that will either be the end of it, or it will be limited in its audience.
I'm sticking with that, and if I'm wrong, oh well. Not the end of the world. I'm ready for new trends myself, because, honestly, I didn't much care for the old ones these last years. Creepy Chinese girls and tied up ice cube women just didn't do much for me.
Your spot on. Torture horror is about to die. Saw IV will make less than the original one and I see the real horror winner being Trick R Treat this year. Already audiences are shifting to a different type of horror with the sucess of Disturbia and 1408. The Mist looks to be another in this new trend that could be a success.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:59 pm |
|
|