An official call to ban Maverikk.
Author |
Message |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Clearly you aren't reading the full posts.
'He didn't mean it' is in reference to Mav's comments on not wanting to be a member of the site.
If you are going to argue and berate people in the thread, please devote the time to actually reading other peoples posts.
_________________
|
Thu May 17, 2007 1:31 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
I mean everything I say.
If Mav doesn't mean everything he says, then it's just another of many unlikeable characteristics of him.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Thu May 17, 2007 1:36 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Banning him would be better for the forum. Anyone who wants to talk to him either does so already through other means or still could through PM.
But, this site is pretty laxxxx about bannings and rules, so yeah, if you don't ban him, I'll just have to ignore him, post less, whatever. I don't have the time or energy for Maverikk's bullshit anymore.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 6:55 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
Sigh. Ban him and be done with it.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 7:03 am |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
First, I don't feel comfortable with people always mentioning Libs' name with Maverikk's name in these arguments.
Second, my name can be mentioned, because I honestly do have an issue. If someone says that they feel KJ is a community that is slowly self-destructing and that they want to stay away from such a bad place, then why don't they? Why does Mav care what anyone says about him? No, I don't agree with people baiting him into a discussion, but he also shouldn't give a damn, if he really does hate KJ. Actually, he shouldn't be reading any of it if he hates the place.
He left KJ a few months ago to talk on Box Office Mojo to real people who don't have grudges against him. Then, he stopped posting on BOM because people like Shack were following him there, and he didn't want to deal with that on BOM as well. So... isn't the logical answer to... move as far away from this forum? He did the exact opposite! I don't care what he does, but that's really silly if he hates some of us so much.
Plus, it wasn't right to use the blatantly homophobic words that he used last night, in reference to zennier. The "14-year-olds on mommy's computer" lines are cool. I'm sure most get a kick out of them. But has it really come to calling someone a queer? An insecure queer sheep?
And I realize that I said I have a problem with Mav, while expressing how I don't agree with people baiting him into discussion. I'm two-faced on the issue. Big whoop.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Thu May 17, 2007 8:17 am |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
IMO a lot of people here are pussies. Geez, how about ignoring him? i do get the feeling many of you follow him everywhere on this site just to spite him and make him blow up.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 10:56 am |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
neo_wolf wrote: IMO a lot of people here are pussies. Geez, how about ignoring him? i do get the feeling many of you follow him everywhere on this site just to spite him and make him blow up.
And why doesn't he ignore us? If this community sucks so much, why does he bother coming here anymore? I'm sure he has the e-mail addresses of people he enjoys talking to. He doesn't need KJ.
It goes both ways here.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Thu May 17, 2007 11:13 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
This is why I strongly support the all-loved IGNORE button.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Thu May 17, 2007 11:46 am |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
book wrote: This is why I strongly support the all-loved IGNORE button.
That would def help the most and i think would solve this problem 100%.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 11:58 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40262
|
I'm on the side of "Let's just ban him already and be done with it"
Sorry, but he isn't a regular poster anymore. NONE of his posts are non-fight related. He goes away, secretly reads this forum, and then as soon as his name is mentioned he jumps in and provokes people. Or, for instance in the AI thread, he'll come in and gloat.
He's a fucking troll. Not a negative poster, a TROLL. He's here to create animosity. Half the forum wants him gone. Can't we just do it already? This is much less than what Goldie was. I think it's simple democracy. There are about 10 people who want him banned. There are just as many who say he's a useless poster who should just be ignored at every post. Let's just get rid of him, please.
If we don't ban him, he'll go away for 2 weeks, then pop right in as soon as he can start shit. It happens again and again and again. He made blatent homophobic comments, pleassse... let's finish this.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu May 17, 2007 1:22 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40262
|
Seriously, after this http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 9&start=50 thread, how can you not ban him? The only thing stopping Mav from getting the axe is that he's had a long history with most of the users here, from BOM and etc. If someone else was making those comments, it wouldn't be a problem to dump him immediatley.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu May 17, 2007 1:27 pm |
|
 |
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm Posts: 4632
|
Let the mods decide. A call for banning is just fucking stupid. Unless he's ruining your experience (which he shouldn't be, because it's much too easy to ignore someone on a website) then I think you should mind your own damn business whether or not he's a douchebag.
Which I think he is.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:07 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
I think Mr. X made a good point about something here (not trying to get you in trouble with the Mavinator, though!). Why is it that everyone says, "just ignore him"? Like, does that not go both ways? Maverikk needs to ignore our comments about him while he's "gone," especially when he claims to be such an "adult" who pays bills.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:45 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
I don't want him to be banned by any means, but the guy needs to grow up. His remarks to zennier were kind of blatant and
really hateful and [may] have upset some people. However if you're not gay, I don't see how you can comment either. That's my 2c.
Also the mob-mentality that some of you show is kind of ridiculous.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 2:52 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40262
|
For me the thing that solidifies why he should be banned, is that he doesn't contribute to this board in any other way than pissing people off. He's trolling, plain and simple. How many chances does he get.
Let's runthrough some of the rules Mav has been breaking:
Quote: 1. The administrators’ most important responsibility is monitoring the health of the forum. If the administrators feel that someone or something is having a negative effect on the forum, they will address the issue and will rectify it. They will employ the use of the moderators and will also ask the forum members for assistance and cooperation.
Unhealthy to the forum? Check. Quote: 6. Language:. Members will be requested to be civil towards each other and not engage in any kind of racial slurs whatsoever. The moderators realize that there are occasions where certain undesirable words may be used in a discussion topic. The moderators will reserve the right to judge if it will pass for an offense or not. In addition to that, members are requested to be respectful towards one another. If constant attempts by a member to spite others for the sake of fun are noticed by the administrators or moderators, the member’s actions will be addressed. As mentioned above, the administrator’s main responsibility is the health of the forums. If a member is purposely trying to ‘piss’ others off, it effects the health of the forum!
Racial(well... homophobic is in the same boat) slurs? Check. Quote: 8. Posting style and behavior: We do not dictate how a person should and should not post a message or where they should post a message. But sometimes, a member’s actions pose a threat to the health of the forums. A word of advice is to be tactful and respectful about how you post. We are all from different places here and have a different way of conversing. We find different things offensive. Joke around with who you know will take a joke. Also learn to take a joke from others. But if a member is purposely found bothering a poster again and again just because you feel they think they have the right to say what they feel like, it will not fly well with the moderators and administrators here. Action will be taken against that member.
9. Personal Attacks: Flame wars are a part of forums. The moderators and administrators will keep a check on any disagreements taking place between certain members here. The moderators will encourage ways to sort out the problems. As long as the discussion pertains to the subject at hand, the discussion is fine. If a moderator notices that a purely healthy discussion is turning into attacks on a person’s character or issues that are in no way relevant to the topic at hand, the moderators will step in and warn users from engaging in this type of behavior. Bottom line: Do not attack a person’s character, looks, and/or social life if it has no connection at all to the topic at hand.
Random unprovoked attacks? Check. Quote: 10. Exceptional cases: Sometimes, members develop problems with each other, turning into long term grudges. If moderators and administrators notice these grudges effecting the otherwise healthy discussions in threads, they will step in and take action. We will not tolerate attacks between these members for no relevant reason. If you do not like one member here, do not purposely start a fight with them. If you have a legitimate reason to answer their post especially with some negativity, keep it related to the topic and make it so it is not confrontational. If you’re attacked for no reason whatsoever by a member you have issues with, contact a moderator or an administrator, don't reply back and start a fight and destroy a completely nice thread.
Starting grudges with half the forum and blowing up threads? Check. Quote: 11. Member input: Please advise the moderators and administrators of the site of your concerns. This may be regarding the behavior of another member, problems with the site or anything that may concern the forum directly.
Half the forum wanting him gone? Check.
I'm just sick of this going on for years and years, and every time having people step in and say "No... no banning... you guys are taking this too far" YEARS AND YEARS. Over and over and over. We ignore him for a couple weeks, he comes back and does it again. He is never going to grow up and he is never going to change, his mind is far too stubborn and off-base for that. If half the forum want him banned and half the forum agree he's useless and we should just ignore all his posts, it's clear nobody wants him here. God.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu May 17, 2007 3:09 pm |
|
 |
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm Posts: 4632
|
I just think it's wrong if everyone takes on the role of moderator and feels they have the right to declare who should and should not be banned; we have no authority to create threads for the sole purpose of trying to get someone banned. I don't even remember who started this thread, and I'm too lazy to check, but why couldn't you have just PMed a mod or two? Hmm...I really can't think of any other reason except you knew you had a lot of people of your side and it'd make you look good.
The creation of this thread is almost as immature as Maverick himself. Once again I'm not defending him, I just think people are getting a little loopy over here.
Shack, frankly, you suck. I've never read one thing on this board that would make it become more of a positive experience for me, or anyone else for that matter. You're flat out boring, immature, and not very bright, and yet for some reason you think these traits make you better than everyone else. But you don't see me spending precious time coming up with a whole fuckin' checklist of why you should never be allowed to speak again here. I just deal with it. So why can't you put up with Mav for now, and wait for the mods to handle it themselves? (which shouldn't be much longer)
|
Thu May 17, 2007 3:47 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Maverikk wrote: Positive* Jon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Positive* Jon wrote: When you have me, Zingaling, da torri, Shack, Michael (Michael!), Libs, Mr X., Snrub, Archie and Getluv (Freaking Getluv!) all united on an issue, you know that issue is a strong one. Uh...when exactly did Libs give you permission to speak for her about me? You're actually right there. I deleted her from the original post. So now you just have me, Zingaling, da torri, Shack, Michael, Mr X., Snrub, Archie, Getluv, KGay and all the other posters that are giving you the silent strike. Mighty impressive how you unite the forum like that Maverikk! KGAY? So now Zack is KGAY? If you are referring to Rod, Christian, Tim, etc... I don't think any of them would be able to tell you of a time that I talked to them with anything but respect. Zack doesn't represent THEM, but nice try. My comments to Zack were in reference to another confrontation I had with him when he got upset because I didn't want James Bond to have a gay scene. I was labeled a gay basher. That's all he sees me as, so that's what I figured I'd give him.
The James Bond schtick has little or nothing to do with anything. I could care less about James Bond being gay... you were simply being a dick (a refreshing change of pace for you...) and I called you out. Unlike you, I don't hold grudges. The comments stem from the fact that I really have no tolerance for you at this point. Absolutely none. I'm not even particularly close to this group that is ragging on you (rightfully so) and I still feel impassioned to speak out against you.... you bring out the best in me. I simply don't like you or the way you wonder the boards nagging people. While people might bate you, it's long been established that you're the antagonistic troll with some serious social retardation.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 4:17 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Zack, wipe your pussy if you are so sensitive. Maybe it will help.
French man. Are you still 33 years old? You really have no place to call anybody a douche when you don't have any honor and your word is shit.
Mr. X - You are worse that a gossipy old woman. Do you ALWAYS have to add your opinion, as if anybody cares? After what you did at BOM, you are the last person who should ever question anybody else, but you are always running to be first in line. Again, your two faced nature is why I've never given you a free pass.
Shack - HALF the forum? I see you still lie and talk yourself into believing those lies. Get some help... If anybody has destroyed these forums, it's you and your ilk. Haven't you noticed how nobody intelligent cares to carry on a conversation with you? You also suck at box office predicting, and as for your awards knowledge...well...let's just say that anybody with a modicum of knowledge about it can see that you are clueless. That's not MY fault. Don't get all self righteous and use the 'rules" when they are conveient for you, because you and all your little buddies break them all the time.
neo_wolf - you are a lot smarter than the rest of these jokers.
Eagle - You know, word does get back to me whenever a shitty comment is made about me. As anybody can see, there wouldn't be a problem if the troublemakers here were actually held accountable, but they never are. I don't accept the blame for standing up for myself after yet another unprovoked attack by the same handful of people. (who, according to Shack's math, represents HALF of the forum.)
Banning me would just be a needless headache. You know that I have a dynamic IP address, and I also have two computers, so I could post anytime I wanted, banned or not, and if my only purpose here was just to come here and post a few antagonistic insults every once in awhile, a ban isn't exactly going to stop that.
Here's my advice:
Tell your members to keep their yaps shut about me or don't whine when they get EXACTLY what they wanted. Haven't both Zingy and torrino said that they like arguing with me? We all know they did, yet here is this thread started by the two of them Can you see what I'm getting at?
|
Thu May 17, 2007 5:23 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40262
|
the french man wrote: I just think it's wrong if everyone takes on the role of moderator and feels they have the right to declare who should and should not be banned; we have no authority to create threads for the sole purpose of trying to get someone banned. I don't even remember who started this thread, and I'm too lazy to check, but why couldn't you have just PMed a mod or two? Hmm...I really can't think of any other reason except you knew you had a lot of people of your side and it'd make you look good.
The creation of this thread is almost as immature as Maverick himself. Once again I'm not defending him, I just think people are getting a little loopy over here.
Shack, frankly, you suck. I've never read one thing on this board that would make it become more of a positive experience for me, or anyone else for that matter. You're flat out boring, immature, and not very bright, and yet for some reason you think these traits make you better than everyone else. But you don't see me spending precious time coming up with a whole fuckin' checklist of why you should never be allowed to speak again here. I just deal with it. So why can't you put up with Mav for now, and wait for the mods to handle it themselves? (which shouldn't be much longer)
I love you too frenchie
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu May 17, 2007 5:38 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Maverikk wrote: Here's my advice:
Tell your members to keep their yaps shut about me or don't whine when they get EXACTLY what they wanted. Haven't both Zingy and torrino said that they like arguing with me? We all know they did, yet here is this thread started by the two of them Can you see what I'm getting at?
lol, you're in no position to give advice. No one cares.
And yeah, it's a bit fun to argue with you, but I'd take your absence over your presence any day of the week.
Also, for the love of God, get off people's dicks when they agree with you. If neo_wolf changed his opinion tomorrow, you'd come up with a million stupid reasons to hate neo_wolf ("You've always been a fucking punk... blah blah blah").
|
Thu May 17, 2007 6:11 pm |
|
 |
Korrgan
problem?
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am Posts: 15515 Location: Bait Shop
|
the french man wrote: I just think it's wrong if everyone takes on the role of moderator and feels they have the right to declare who should and should not be banned; we have no authority to create threads for the sole purpose of trying to get someone banned. I don't even remember who started this thread, and I'm too lazy to check, but why couldn't you have just PMed a mod or two? Hmm...I really can't think of any other reason except you knew you had a lot of people of your side and it'd make you look good.
The creation of this thread is almost as immature as Maverick himself. Once again I'm not defending him, I just think people are getting a little loopy over here.
I agree with everything, but the Shack comments. Which was kinda... wtf frenchie?
It's kinda lame, people calling to ban him. Just seems dumb. What's with da torri, though? He seems obsessed.
_________________
|
Thu May 17, 2007 6:33 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Maverikk wrote: Mr. X - You are worse that a gossipy old woman. Do you ALWAYS have to add your opinion, as if anybody cares? After what you did at BOM, you are the last person who should ever question anybody else, but you are always running to be first in line. Again, your two faced nature is why I've never given you a free pass.
Gossipy old woman? What I did at BOM? Two-faced? Oh my god, I'm so darn angry!!!
But not really. I don't care. So why do you care so much what others think of you? Or what they say about you? Again, you can move on just as much as Shack, Zing, torri, etc. Just let it go already. Ignore those people. Ignore me. Why don't you? You can't. No matter what, no matter how little my opinion supposedly matters, you can't ignore us. I don't understand why. Be better than we are, and ignore us.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Thu May 17, 2007 6:59 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Ban the fucker.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 8:38 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
well i think i got in an argument with maverikk once over on bom but other than that i've never had a run in with this dude. the comments he made are immature and frankly offensive. However, making this thread is pretty immature as well. Every month there seems to be a new thread asking for ban on this dude and its from the same exact people. In case you havn't noticed, it aint going to happen. You can bitch and bitch and bitch and then maybe even bitch some more but he aint going to get banned, just move the fuck on. There are people on boards i just cannot stand, well actually just one or two people but not the point.
This part is mainly towards shack. Shack you know ur my boy and all but grow the fuck up. You ran BOF for fucks sake and u did a damn good job. But pissing and moaning about this dude just makes you look like a little bitch. You gotta quit being so damn hurt when things are said and grow a thicker skin. Shit happens and you move on. Come on now buddy.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 11:20 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Korrgan wrote: It's kinda lame, people calling to ban him. Just seems dumb. What's with da torri, though? He seems obsessed.
At the risk of Zingy telling me to get off your dick (which I apparently do when I'm in agreement with somebody  ), you're very level headed and observant.
|
Thu May 17, 2007 11:24 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|