Author |
Message |
film-lover
Star Trek XI
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:26 am Posts: 382 Location: The Grind House
|
Zingaling wrote: Also, did anyone else think the movie was too long? I usually don't have problems sitting in long films, especially entertaining ones like Spider-Man 3, but I just felt exhausted afterwards.
I kind of agree. I left feeling a bit depressed as well.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 12:53 am |
|
 |
Speevy
Veteran
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:12 am Posts: 3139
|
film-lover wrote: Zingaling wrote: Also, did anyone else think the movie was too long? I usually don't have problems sitting in long films, especially entertaining ones like Spider-Man 3, but I just felt exhausted afterwards. I kind of agree. I left feeling a bit depressed as well.
Wouldn't the depression be more due to the movie itself? It didn't exactly have a happy ending.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 12:54 am |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
I was hoping this would be nominated for an Oscar, to crown the whole trilogy the way ROTK's win did LOTR.
Do you guys think there's still a chance of that?
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun May 06, 2007 1:04 am |
|
 |
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am Posts: 12119 Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Um, no.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 1:05 am |
|
 |
Speevy
Veteran
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:12 am Posts: 3139
|
Box wrote: I was hoping this would be nominated for an Oscar, to crown the whole trilogy the way ROTK's win did LOTR.
Do you guys think there's still a chance of that?
Not sure if that was a joke but the Spider-man movies were never Best Picture contendors. It will be nominated for a couple technical Oscars but not Best Picture or Best Director.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 1:07 am |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote: Jmart007 wrote: I saw it again today with a friend. I hated it even more. The first half which I tolerated yesterday actually wasn't as good as I remember it being. And the Bruce Campbell scene wasn't funny. It's replay value won't be very good.
C- You saw it again today after you hated it the 1st time.. Where's the logic in that?? If you didn't like the movie at all the 1st time, what would compel you to shell out $$$ to see it again, even with a friend??? Could it be that maybe you really did enjoy the movie more than your willing to admit??? That settles it folks: There's too much overexagerration in hate for this movie, even the reactions some of you post over the movie and people hating is overexagerrated so hang it up.... Speevy wrote: What exactly is the logic in watching a movie that you give a C- to twice?
I didn't pay for it on both occasions, so I didn't lose money one way or the other.
The first time I saw the movie I gave it a C (Way to read up on that). Second time I around I figured I was going to like it a little bit more or hate it a little bit more. I went the other way. As a matter of fact, on the second time I made fun of the movie even a little bit more and laughed throughout the entire thing with my friend. That's the best way to enjoy horrible movies.
I'm so sorry to disappoint the Raimi brown-nosers.
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 1:34 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21895 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
I dont know if I ever mentioned this before, but it was a treat for me to see an ex lady friend of mine in the film. We used to act together in high school, but no college for her, she went right into acting. She was a blonde girl in a few scenes when Tobey was dancing in his montage on the street. She had lines too, but they were cut from the film.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sun May 06, 2007 1:45 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15571 Location: Everywhere
|
film-lover wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: I would give the movie a B. I think the biggest problem with the film is there is one too many villains. They should have either got rid of Sandman or saved Venom for the next sequel. I think they just tried to get too much into the movie. I did like the Harry part of the film. And his death was sad although, I liked how he redeemed himself. He sure got a better death than he did in the comic books. Same for me. I thought Franco gave the least effective performance of all the villans, but his character worked in a few ways. They could have done more with Sandman and saved Venom for another movie. I also thought it could have done without Gwen Stacey(although I will admit Howard looked the best she's ever looked in any movie here). They could have had either the landlords daughter or even Betty Brandt take her place. P.S. Does anyone else think the J.K. Simmons as Jameson is the best casting idea that ever could have happened to this franchise? All of his scenes are comedic gold(the audience lost it during the medication scene, the end battle where he tried to get the camera from the girl, and when he told he Peter "I didn't hire you for this position").
Yeah, he was really the main thing to get me to laugh during the movie. He was the only character I really liked besides Brock.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 2:28 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
The Dark Shape wrote: Pirates 2 is a much better movie than Spider-Man 3.
Agreed, and I thought Pirates 2 was a big disappointment.
At least I still have Shack, jmart, loyal, and Gulli on my side of the "this is a terrible movie" argument. 
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun May 06, 2007 2:29 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40589
|
The Dark Shape wrote: Pirates 2 is a much better movie than Spider-Man 3.
Most definitley.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun May 06, 2007 2:35 am |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
Shack Your Booty, Love wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: Pirates 2 is a much better movie than Spider-Man 3. Most definitley.
Sadly.
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 2:41 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
It really saddens me to see Zingy give this a higher grade than Children of Men... 
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun May 06, 2007 2:43 am |
|
 |
STROKER ACE
Speed Racer
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 7:07 pm Posts: 199
|
Showing my stupidity here, but what is this "emo" Peter thing everyone keeps referring to?? What does "emo" mean?
|
Sun May 06, 2007 3:29 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15571 Location: Everywhere
|
trixster wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: Pirates 2 is a much better movie than Spider-Man 3. Agreed, and I thought Pirates 2 was a big disappointment. At least I still have Shack, jmart, loyal, and Gulli on my side of the "this is a terrible movie" argument. 
I'm with you, although I've always disliked the franchise.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 3:46 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
How on Gods Green Earth can you compare a comicbook movie like SPIDERMAN 3 to POTC 2??? Where's the similarities here??? Apples and oranges folks..
|
Sun May 06, 2007 9:32 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Jayhawk wrote: BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote: Jmart007 wrote: I saw it again today with a friend. I hated it even more. The first half which I tolerated yesterday actually wasn't as good as I remember it being. And the Bruce Campbell scene wasn't funny. It's replay value won't be very good.
C- You saw it again today after you hated it the 1st time.. Where's the logic in that?? If you didn't like the movie at all the 1st time, what would compel you to shell out $$$ to see it again, even with a friend??? Could it be that maybe you really did enjoy the movie more than your willing to admit??? That settles it folks: There's too much overexagerration in hate for this movie, even the reactions some of you post over the movie and people hating is overexagerrated so hang it up.... i've seen movies more than once that i disliked many times. Movies to me are a social thing so if i've seen it once and a couple of my friends who havnt seen it give me a call and ask if i want to go, i'll see it again or if my dad wants to see it i'll go see it with him. Hell i saw Bad News Bears more than once in theaters. I remember having to sit through The New Guy i think 4 times in theaters.
I'm sorry but I don't buy into your philosophy 1 bit.. If you dislike a movie and you see it several times over?? Then you liked the movie, plain and simple.. No one is stupid enough to see a movie once, come out of it supposedly hating it then turn around and shell out $$$ to see 2 more times.. No way and anyone else who does this needs to have their heads examined..
|
Sun May 06, 2007 9:40 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Zingaling wrote: Also, did anyone else think the movie was too long? I usually don't have problems sitting in long films, especially entertaining ones like Spider-Man 3, but I just felt exhausted afterwards.
If it weren't as long as what it was, you can sure bet people would've bitched about that to saying there was too much to cover and not enough time.. When one comes ut of a movie like this exhausted, to me, that's a good thing cause it held your attention the whole time..
|
Sun May 06, 2007 9:42 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
in that case, they should have tried to cover less in less time
|
Sun May 06, 2007 9:55 am |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote: How on Gods Green Earth can you compare a comicbook movie like SPIDERMAN 3 to POTC 2??? Where's the similarities here??? Apples and oranges folks.. Exactly. And Apples (SM3) are delicious, while Oranges (Pirates2) are disgusting. Pirates is about one seventy-first the film SM3 is - and that's based on my initial disappointment, not my new-found love because people in this thread are insane. :O :O
|
Sun May 06, 2007 10:10 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
Just discovered last night that in the scale of entertainment.
Fast and the Furious 3 > Spiderman 3. Yup its that depressingly bad.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sun May 06, 2007 10:12 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Tonight ... YOU! wrote: in that case, they should have tried to cover less in less time
If they did that, you all still would've complained.. Follow the trend here??? No matter how Raimi would've done this movie as great as it was already, you never would've been happy.. Hardcor* comic fans really are too nitpicky with stuff like this..
|
Sun May 06, 2007 10:13 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
BKB_THE_DEPARTED wrote: Tonight ... YOU! wrote: in that case, they should have tried to cover less in less time If they did that, you all still would've complained.. Follow the trend here??? No matter how Raimi would've done this movie as great as it was already, you never would've been happy.. Hardcor* comic fans really are too nitpicky with stuff like this..
nope
i wouldn't have.
i've already said that somewhere in that movie i saw friday night was a kik ass spiderman film. it needed no additions, no modifications .. just a lot of bad bits taken out.
i'm with moviedude on this one. i love the great parts but hate the bad parts.
i still love the butler though
|
Sun May 06, 2007 10:15 am |
|
 |
Mr. Inc
Veteran
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:50 am Posts: 3350
|
I dont think I posted my view in here but I will now
B+/A-. Hate it or whatever, I really enjoyed myself. I found the first two to be really overrated but this finally brought some emotion into the film. I dont love Spider-Man because they try to make him too relateable but whatever, here he had emotion and it worked. THe action was incredible, Sandman's first scene in the streets was amazing. The acting from Franco got much better. Dunst, is okay. There is no plot really, just a lot of subplots. I loved Venom. And I FINALLY really loved Jamerson, he has the least screen time in all of the 3 but this was his funniest moment.
|
Sun May 06, 2007 10:35 am |
|
 |
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am Posts: 1011 Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
The first time I see a movie, I am usually generous toward it grade-wise. I gave POTC 2 a C on initial viewing (a subsequent DVD viewing has brought it down to a D) and I gave Doom a C- just because the FPS scene was so damn cool despite everything else sucking hard, but I cannot forgive this movie. I just can't bring myself to do it.
Now, I'll admit that after the first 45 minutes or so, I was all ready to support BKB and say that you guys are nitpickers who should lighten up and enjoy the movie. But what follows in the remaining 2 hours is one of the most painfully horrid moviegoing experiences I have ever witnessed. It was like I had fallen into the Twilight Zone, where time slows to a still and no matter how long you think it's been since you last looked at your watch, only 2 minutes have elapsed. This movie is mindnumbingly horrid and not even a solid opening can save it. Now, if you would excuse me, I'm going to try and repress this movie from my mind like I did with *shudder* Crank.
D
_________________
|
Sun May 06, 2007 11:05 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
trixster wrote: It really saddens me to see Zingy give this a higher grade than Children of Men... 
It saddens me that you expected otherwise. 
|
Sun May 06, 2007 11:16 am |
|
|