Author |
Message |
gotdane
Iron Man
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 1:55 am Posts: 622 Location: AMC
|
almost famous wrote: Could anyone explain why We Are Marshall has 6,64 weekend gross and 7,745 total?
Sneak Previews a week ago?
|
Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:34 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
alex young wrote: MadGez wrote: And the only date flick. Add to that - films like Failure to Launch are making more money. Its just strange. And its a good film too. Perhaps its the fact that its over 2 hours long which could be restricting showtimes as well. This is a major stumbling block for women who are busy shopping before Christmas. It will pick up after Christmas but it may be a bit too late. Romantic comedies tend to be more successful if it has a strong male lead like Matthew McConaughey, Jack Nicholson, Will Smith, Mel Gibson, etc. Jude Law and Jack Black seem to be only supporting characters in this film so they won't draw. I'm not sure if this is because females want some male eye candy or if males are more willing to go with some kind of male protagonist in the movie.
I wouldn't classify Ralph Fiennes as a strong male lead/draw either...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:38 pm |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Squishy wrote: MovieDude wrote: Well the cast really wasn't nearly as stellar as people were making it out to be. Two of the stars are box office poison, and Jack Black's audience wouldn't want to see a film like that. Also, it looked too fluffy - there wasn't really much of a plot, just two women switch houses and have a really good time hooking up with guys. apparently you think everyone is box office posion. The entire point of the cast was bringing varied audiences together. Kate Winslet fans arent exactly the same people as Jack Black fans. I believe The Holiday should have been released earlier.
Show me evidence that Cameron Diaz and Jude Law aren't poison. Cameron Diaz is probably the second most overpaid actress working today after Nicole Kidman, and Jude Law has just been in one bomb after another - especially the films he's tried to anchor.
Varied audiences? I'm sure that was the idea, but The Holiday attracted 65% women, 57% over the age of 25. The only guys who went were on dates, hoping they could get some action. When would have been a better time to release it, the date worked out perfectly for previous rom coms, and there hadn't been one in ages. Even if this doubles it's run from here (and I kinda doubt it, though it's not impossible I suppose) it still had a ridiculously high 85 million budget. It's a woops, plain and simple.
|
Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:53 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
There wasn't a better time to release this film. It was the perfect spot.
Guys, We Are Marshall made $7.7m this weekend, not $6.6m.
|
Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:18 pm |
|
 |
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm Posts: 4632
|
Holiday's plot/storyline/subject matter whatever you want to call it was not appealing or even noticeable enough to make people want to go see it...Women switch houses...That's still all I know about the movie. Stars don't guarentee success.
|
Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:33 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
For the record, The Holiday was awesome. Go see it.
Also: It will probably end with a bit more than Family Stone, about $65-70M perhaps. This isn't terrible, it's just a little less than people expected. It, like many other films, will turn a profit on DVD (I remember Rumor Has It doing well when it was released on DVD despite its middling $43M box office total).
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:05 am |
|
 |
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am Posts: 12119 Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Gotta love the "it'll turn a profit on DVD" excuse.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:26 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
The Dark Shape wrote: Gotta love the "it'll turn a profit on DVD" excuse.
I don't see it as an excuse as much as...the truth?
I mean...it will. So what's the problem?
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:36 am |
|
 |
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
The Good Shepherd did very solid.  I'm happy.
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:36 am |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
I gotta agree with Darkshape. I dont like Plan B arguments, first it was "nonsense of course its not going to track well in certain areas because they arent the demographic it caters to" and then its "it will have good legs" and when that doesnt go well they say "it will do great on dvd". Heck you dont see me arguing with BKB about Rocky and using the dvd/leg excuse about its opening week
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:54 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Libs wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: Gotta love the "it'll turn a profit on DVD" excuse. I don't see it as an excuse as much as...the truth? I mean...it will. So what's the problem?
It's not that you're wrong, but it seems like whenever a movie is significantly overpredicted, "the real money is in DVD sales" argument is one of the first things to be said. Yeah it'll make a bit more then The Family Stone, but it also costed almost five times as much. If it ends up in the black, it's still a pretty big dissapointment considering how it'll be coming in at much less then many similar rom coms that were far cheaper. Dec. 8th - 10th had a lot of financial blunders open. Not one of the four releases will make back their budget domestically.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:55 am |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
El_Masked_fuerte_grande wrote: I gotta agree with Darkshape. I dont like Plan B arguments, first it was "nonsense of course its not going to track well in certain areas because they arent the demographic it caters to" and then its "it will have good legs" and when that doesnt go well they say "it will do great on dvd". Heck you dont see me arguing with BKB about Rocky and using the dvd/leg excuse about its opening week
'Tis true.
_________________ See above.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:01 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
El_Masked_fuerte_grande wrote: I gotta agree with Darkshape. I dont like Plan B arguments, first it was "nonsense of course its not going to track well in certain areas because they arent the demographic it caters to" and then its "it will have good legs" and when that doesnt go well they say "it will do great on dvd". Heck you dont see me arguing with BKB about Rocky and using the dvd/leg excuse about its opening week
Yes, but you also don't particularly like me or anything I have to say, so I'm inclined not to listen to your thoughts.
Merry Christmas
Bwahahaha
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:26 am |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
Libs wrote: El_Masked_fuerte_grande wrote: I gotta agree with Darkshape. I dont like Plan B arguments, first it was "nonsense of course its not going to track well in certain areas because they arent the demographic it caters to" and then its "it will have good legs" and when that doesnt go well they say "it will do great on dvd". Heck you dont see me arguing with BKB about Rocky and using the dvd/leg excuse about its opening week Yes, but you also don't particularly like me or anything I have to say, so I'm inclined not to listen to your thoughts. Merry Christmas Bwahahaha
You're welcome and I already had that vibe from your condescending reply even when Im not addressing you at all.But you do have a tendency to respond more to my posts than I do to you so pretty much its the other way around where you dont want me around.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:02 am |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12197
|
Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174
4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758
6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057
12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163
8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808
4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:39 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
O wrote: Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174 4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758 6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057 12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163 8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808 4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs.
Fur? Birth? The Human Stain? Dogville? I know they weren't meant to make much at the box office, but the highest paid actress out there should be able to push these films past the level they reached. That said, I'll agree that Cameron Diaz is even more overpaid.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:46 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Kind of surprised but not entirely that The Holiday didn't do better. I finally saw it yesterday and while decent (Winslet is a very good actor) some of the lines are so corny and false that one wonders how Myers didn't see that sometime during the process of making the movie. Plus, knowing all we know about Jude Law, it's awfully hard to accept him as a guy who reads parenting books, let alone is the one raising two kids. In real life, it seems he would be more likely to run out on his wife, leaving her to take care of the kids. Jack Black was actually fine in the movie, although he did get annoying at times. Eli Wallach and Winslet fared the best.
Plus, didn't anyone have a problem with Diaz/Law having sex the first time they meet? A little irresponsible, no?
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:48 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
MovieDude wrote: O wrote: Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174 4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758 6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057 12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163 8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808 4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs. Fur? Birth? The Human Stain? Dogville? I know they weren't meant to make much at the box office, but the highest paid actress out there should be able to push these films past the level they reached. That said, I'll agree that Cameron Diaz is even more overpaid.
The Holiday is indeed burdened with a grossly overpaid actor in Diaz. What has she done to deserve it?
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:49 am |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12197
|
MovieDude wrote: O wrote: Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174 4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758 6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057 12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163 8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808 4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs. Fur? Birth? The Human Stain? Dogville? I know they weren't meant to make much at the box office, but the highest paid actress out there should be able to push these films past the level they reached. That said, I'll agree that Cameron Diaz is even more overpaid.
Bankability doesn't play as big a role in some of those smaller films, where being able to open a picture with mainstream audiences isn't as important, as having an actual GOOD film for indie audiences. Thus, the bigger factor at play for those smaller films is quality, which is more influential for those types of films. And I'm sure she doesn't get the same paycheck for some of those films. But in terms of her mainstream films, which go wide, she does deliver openings, for a broad range of genres, that alot of other actresses can't. But she really needs to pull a monster box office success soon if she wants to remain a player.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 3:13 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15573 Location: Everywhere
|
the french man wrote: Holiday's plot/storyline/subject matter whatever you want to call it was not appealing or even noticeable enough to make people want to go see it...Women switch houses...That's still all I know about the movie. Stars don't guarentee success.
I think that's pretty much it. I never thought the movie had a chance at 100m. I agree with MovieDude, the cast is overpaid and the budget shouldn't have been that high.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 3:20 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
MovieDude wrote: O wrote: Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174 4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758 6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057 12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163 8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808 4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs. Fur? Birth? The Human Stain? Dogville? I know they weren't meant to make much at the box office, but the highest paid actress out there should be able to push these films past the level they reached. That said, I'll agree that Cameron Diaz is even more overpaid.
Tom Hanks couldn't make Ladykillers a bigger hit than it was. The end. Some films simply can't do any well at the box-office and those you listed are the ones that fall into that category. Kidman is currently the 2nd biggest female draw out there, behind Foster (considering Roberts doesn't make films currently).
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:02 am |
|
 |
Bryan_smith
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm Posts: 2120
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: MovieDude wrote: O wrote: Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174 4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758 6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057 12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163 8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808 4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs. Fur? Birth? The Human Stain? Dogville? I know they weren't meant to make much at the box office, but the highest paid actress out there should be able to push these films past the level they reached. That said, I'll agree that Cameron Diaz is even more overpaid. Tom Hanks couldn't make Ladykillers a bigger hit than it was. The end. Some films simply can't do any well at the box-office and those you listed are the ones that fall into that category. Kidman is currently the 2nd biggest female draw out there, behind Foster (considering Roberts doesn't make films currently).
Foster? I beg to differ...
And since when does Roberts not make movies anymore? She was in the last Oceans 12 just about two years ago, and also is currently the voice in Charlotte's Web.
Let's not even mention her early career, which ofcourse included Pretty Woman and look at the past decade of films she has starred in .... (and keep in mind, some of these totals are from 10 years ago, and would adjust much higher total)
My Best Friend's Wedding -- 127.1 million
Conspiracy Theory -- 75.9 million
Stepmom -- 91.1 million
Notting Hill -- 116 million
Runaway Bride -- 152 million
Erin Brockovich -- 125 million
The Mexican -- 66.8 million
America's Sweetheart -- 93.6 million
Ocean's Eleven -- 183 million
Mona Lisa Smile -- 63. 9 million
Closer -- 33.9 million
Ocean's Twelve -- 125 million
A pretty impressive list if you ask me, and certainly making her the most bankable actress of the past ten years...
_________________ spaces.msn.com/members/metropolis19
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:19 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Bryan_smith wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: MovieDude wrote: O wrote: Nicole Kidman is not as badly overpaid as Diaz is. Kidman has chosen some poor roles lately, but she opens the pictures regardless.
6/24/05 Bewitched Sony $63,313,159 3,188 $20,131,130 3,174 4/22/05 The Interpreter Uni. $72,708,161 2,814 $22,822,455 2,758 6/11/04 The Stepford Wives Par. $59,484,742 3,057 $21,406,781 3,057 12/25/03 Cold Mountain Mira. $95,636,509 2,802 $14,574,213 2,163 8/10/01 The Others Mira. $96,522,687 2,843 $14,089,952 1,678
Diaz:
10/7/05 In Her Shoes Fox $32,880,591 2,840 $10,017,575 2,808 4/12/02 The Sweetest Thing Sony $24,718,164 2,670 $9,430,667 2,670
Charles Angels was a ensemble, heavily nostalgic dependent franchise. I don't think they were the best indicators of her star power. But at least Kidman can open a film. She just needs to choose better roles, for films that might possibly have better legs. Fur? Birth? The Human Stain? Dogville? I know they weren't meant to make much at the box office, but the highest paid actress out there should be able to push these films past the level they reached. That said, I'll agree that Cameron Diaz is even more overpaid. Tom Hanks couldn't make Ladykillers a bigger hit than it was. The end. Some films simply can't do any well at the box-office and those you listed are the ones that fall into that category. Kidman is currently the 2nd biggest female draw out there, behind Foster (considering Roberts doesn't make films currently). Foster? I beg to differ... And since when does Roberts not make movies anymore? She was in the last Oceans 12 just about two years ago, and also is currently the voice in Charlotte's Web. Let's not even mention her early career, which ofcourse included Pretty Woman and look at the past decade of films she has starred in .... (and keep in mind, some of these totals are from 10 years ago, and would adjust much higher total) My Best Friend's Wedding -- 127.1 million Conspiracy Theory -- 75.9 million Stepmom -- 91.1 million Notting Hill -- 116 million Runaway Bride -- 152 million Erin Brockovich -- 125 million The Mexican -- 66.8 million America's Sweetheart -- 93.6 million Ocean's Eleven -- 183 million Mona Lisa Smile -- 63. 9 million Closer -- 33.9 million Ocean's Twelve -- 125 million A pretty impressive list if you ask me, and certainly making her the most bankable actress of the past ten years...
Voice acting doesn't count and neither do small supporting roles. Her last real film was Closer, not quite huge and before that Mona Lisa Smile.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:51 am |
|
 |
Bryan_smith
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm Posts: 2120
|
"At No. 7, "We Are Marshall" stars Matthew McConaughey in the fact-based story of a coach who rallies a small town after its college football team is killed in a 1970 plane crash. Including group sales, the total for the Warner Bros. release stands at $7.7 million. A spokesman for the Time Warner Inc.-owned studio said he had hoped for a stronger opening, but was heartened by enthusiastic exit polling."
Including groups sales? I've never heard that term used before, and what is it, because it accounted for 1.1 million of We Are Marshall's sales...
_________________ spaces.msn.com/members/metropolis19
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:52 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
I think i remmeber someone sayuing that films on New Year's Weekend increase. Is that true? So are we expecting to see NATM make more than 30 mill next weekend?
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:35 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Barrabás and 76 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|