Author |
Message |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals.
Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:19 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals. Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer.
But he's been in Daddy Day Care! 
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:36 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals. Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer. But he's been in Daddy Day Care!  That was oscar worthy compared to Pluto Nash.
Dude hasnt made a good film in i'd say 7 years or so ( unless you count Shrek ), I enjoyed Life and Bowfinger. He doesnt deserve his billions though. He's very charismatic, but other then that, MEH.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:43 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals. Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer. But he's been in Daddy Day Care! 
So?
They wouldn't be nominating him for Daddy Day Care.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:48 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals. Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer. But he's been in Daddy Day Care!  So? They wouldn't be nominating him for Daddy Day Care.
No one deserves to win an Oscar within 10 years of starring in Daddy Day Care. The end.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:53 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: But he's been in Daddy Day Care! 
He was ok in it, I thought.
There are two films that I feel he should have been nominated for in the past. He should have won for his performance in The Nutty Professor! Was there a more challenging part? He pulled those characters off with perfection, and that was the best thing I saw that year. I also thought he was Oscar worthy (for a nomination) for his performance in Life. He's got the chops to pull anything off if the material is good.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:54 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Maverikk wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: But he's been in Daddy Day Care!  He was ok in it, I thought. There are two films that I feel he should have been nominated for in the past. He should have won for his performance in The Nutty Professor! Was there a more challenging part? He pulled those characters off with perfection, and that was the best thing I saw that year. I also thought he was Oscar worthy (for a nomination) for his performance in Life. He's got the chops to pull anything off if the material is good.
I mean not only get nominated but actually should've WON for those performances 
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:58 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Killuminati510 wrote: I mean not only get nominated but actually should've WON for those performances 
I mean that he should have won for Nutty Professor because of the superior performance it took to pull it off. A nomination only for Life. No win.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:01 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Maverikk wrote: Killuminati510 wrote: I mean not only get nominated but actually should've WON for those performances  I mean that he should have won for Nutty Professor because of the superior performance it took to pull it off. A nomination only for Life. No win. Ohhhhhhhhhh that makes alot more sense now
.
.
.
.
.

_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:03 am |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
With Eddie Murphy's past in film, if he was going up for lead actor I would say probably not (at least without jumping a lot of hurdles), but people can be a bit more nutty in their choices for supporting, so I don't think his history necessarily plays against him.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:10 am |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals. Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer. But he's been in Daddy Day Care!  So? They wouldn't be nominating him for Daddy Day Care. No one deserves to win an Oscar within 10 years of starring in Daddy Day Care. The end.
Matt Dillon was nominated for Crash in the same year he appeared in Herbie: Fully Loaded. Charlize Theron was nominated for North Country the same year she appeared in Aeon Flux.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:47 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
triple post
Last edited by Atoddr on Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:48 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
triple post
Last edited by Atoddr on Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:48 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Atoddr wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Maverikk wrote: Why are y'all so sure about Dreamgirls being a lock? Just curious, I'm out of the loop. It killed at Cannes. Early buzz is deafening, early reviews are very positive. Looks like both Murphy and Hudson are locks for noms and wins. Condon has the magic touch when it comes to musicals. Thanks! I'll have to look that one up and read about it. I would pull so hard for Murphy to win!!! I've been an enormous fan of his since he started. I would consider him to be a top 3 all around talent of all time in entertainment, for sure, and I think he could pull off the performance he needed to. He's a good enough screen presence and has been acting for 25 years professionally, so it's not a stretch to believe he's got ability as an actor/performer. But he's been in Daddy Day Care!  So? They wouldn't be nominating him for Daddy Day Care. No one deserves to win an Oscar within 10 years of starring in Daddy Day Care. The end. Matt Dillon was nominated for Crash in the same year he appeared in Herbie: Fully Loaded. Charlize Theron was nominated for North Country the same year she appeared in Aeon Flux.
Hmm, this is a good point about Herbie. However, DDC is far far inferior to Aeon Flux. They at least tried with that one.
Oh and none of the two won anyway.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:32 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Murphy is due for at least a career nom, kinda like with Depp and Pirates. He's one of the most recognizable actors of the last 25 years, and was at one point probably the bankable comedian in Hollywood. And critics actually liked him.
I think he's a lock for at least a nomination, assuming Dreamgirls isn't some Producers-esque disaster.
|
Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:53 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Hollywoodland is moving way down the list, if not completely off. It received not-so-positive reviews from both Variety and The Hollywood Reporter (scored 60 and 50 at metacritic, respectively). The Pianist is the only film I can remember to grab a BP nomination while getting thumbs down from the two, and it had an overall average of 8.2 at RT; Hollywoodland is at 5.8.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:35 pm |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5818
|
xiayun wrote: Hollywoodland is moving way down the list, if not completely off. It received not-so-positive reviews from both Variety and The Hollywood Reporter (scored 60 and 50 at metacritic, respectively). The Pianist is the only film I can remember to grab a BP nomination while getting thumbs down from the two, and it had an overall average of 8.2 at RT; Hollywoodland is at 5.8.
This makes Catch a Fire an even stronger contender than before, since Focus will devote sole attention to campaigning it over Hollywoodland.
|
Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:01 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
I really feel as though Factory Girl is gonna surprise, especially if what im hearing about Sienna Miller as Edie Sedgwick and Guy Pearce as Andy Warhol being very oscar worthy, I can see this becoming the small indie film contender.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:14 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
My post Venice/Toronto rankings:
1. Dreamgirls
No film came out of Venice and Toronto with the kind of revelation that Brokeback Mountain or even Good Night and Good Luck generated, so Dreamgirls remains at the top. Surefire box office hit.
2. Good German
Tobey Maguire's buzz for supporting actor suddenly surged during the last couple of weeks, making me think the early words on Soderbergh's film are at least good. Among the films not shown in the festivals, this feels like the safest bet.
3. United 93
There are so many director candidates for that BP/BD spot (or two), so I don't believe Greengrass will end up being the one. award groups, not just NY/LA/NBR, but more broad ones such as BFCA and GG, will carry the film to a nomination.
4. Babel
Will have critics support, but what about general public? A 7.0 average with 525 votes isn't a great start. Need to score better box office number than 21 Grams.
5. Last King of Scotland
Some are calling it the best of the year. Has the aura of "importance" with historical characters. Has a Best Actor nomination locked up, unlike Don Cheadle, and with an earlier and better-managed campaign than Hotel Rwanda (if it turns out to be the case), it could be enough.
6. The Departed
Good early words, even if there is always that "no chance at BP" sentence somewhere in the review. Great box office potential comparing to other contenders. Tech supports in editing and other categories should be there, and if it can score two acting and director nods, hard to imagine it will miss BP. Will know a lot more soon.
7. Volver
One of the biggest stars of Toronto with Cruz attending. Foreign language is the biggest obstacle. I see Almodóvar and Scorsese as two prime candidates for the lone director spot. Both can make it as well.
8. The Queen
Mirren has locked up a nomination. Strong contender in screenplay and a couple of tech categories as well.
Potentially a crowd pleaser, and that will move it up on the chart.
9. Little Children
The opinions are somewhat divisive on Todd Field's effort. There appears to be a segment in the film that could turn academy voters off. The attentions are more centering around performances.
10. Flags of Our Fathers
I know it's Spielberg + Eastwood + Haggis + WWII, but somehow I just don't feel it. Eastwood is due for a slip, and both Million Dollar Baby and Mystic River are critic-darlings, something I don't see happening with the support that United 93, Little Miss Sunshine, and others have got.
Others
Little Miss Sunshine: its BP chance is pretty much over in correlation with the box office momentum being stopped.
The Good Shepherd: too much unknown, and unlike Eastwood, De Niro has little track record as director.
Bobby: one of the most divisive films of the year. Its chance is fading fast.
Goya's Ghost: no distributor. Don't believe it will be released this year.
|
Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:15 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
United 93
The Good German
Babel
The Last King of Scotland
(another film that isn't Dreamgirls)
Not in that order, but those are the four/five.
|
Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:07 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40500
|
My analysis:
1. Babel
2. Flags of Our Fathers
3. Dreamgirls
4. The Departed
5. United 93
6. The Last King of Scotland
7. Little Children
8. The Good German
9. Running With Scissors
10. The Good Shepard
11. The Queen
12. Bobby
13. Factory Girl
God what an awesome lineup.
Babel seems to be the "hottest" movie to me right now, though the top 3 are oh so very close. I have a feeling that it has a better chance of cleaning up in the critics circles than say Dreamgirls, rising up like the Brokeback of this year possibly. The director is strong enough, the cast is big and can headline shows and red carpets, it's only obstacle is box-office I think, but the academy won't be afraid to award a smaller film the prize if Dreamgirls and The Departed are making enough money and headlines to draw in viewers anyways. Inarratu is pretty much a lock for a BD nom, and should be one of the frontrunners for the win, as Flags and Dreamgirls look like solid bets for the split BP/BD-ers if they end up taking the win.
Flags, well I'm just going off paper here, but anyways unlike you I do have faith that the Easthaggisberg machine will deliver a contender, it just seems like too much of a powerful combo to ignore. Nobody has seen it yet, so it's still completley up in the air, but my inching is that it will make it.
Dreamgirls looks like a solid bet, and the reactions have been great, but I'll need a bit more evidence to declare it as more than a fun audience pleaser. I have no doubt that people will like this movie and it'll make a lot of money, but is it Best Picture good? I don't know yet. I also have 0 faith in Condon, just a personal thing, he's reminded me of James Mangold from the beginning. Kinsey as a past project resides in a similar camp as Girl, Interrupted, IMO.
The Departed is the one I'm cheering for, other than Scorsece getting his due, I think a big loud audience movie like this is something that would do the awards good. I have no doubt it'll be a boxoffice hit, so hopefully that'll begin the momentum, and things can be taken from there. I actually think Scorsece has a good chance at winning, if he can pick up enough steam. They won't give it to Eastwood, for obvious reasons. I also don't think they'll give it to Condon, as he's not that special of a director, and Dreamgirls doesn't require much in the direction area anyways(however I'll admit there is a slim chance he pulls it off.) If either of those win BP, I'm guessing that it'll be a BP/BD split more than likely. So that leaves Inarritu vs Scorsece, it could be the former's year if Babel ends up running the show, but if not, would finally giving Marty his due seem like that much of a stretch? Yes, he's up there.
United 93 should push the reviews and importance card to a nom, by a hair. Critics seem to be passionate enough about this movie, the BP without BD seems like a nice slot. No chance at winning anything, even with the director nom, it'll just be a critical darling with not much more. I wish it would miss the show completley, heh, but I see it popping up by a hair.
The Last King of Scotland, I agree with what xiayan said pretty much, the actor steam is there and the movie looks like quality too, like Capote. The competition might be too strong this year though, unlike in that movie's case. I see it duking out with U93 for the last spot when all is said and done, and it should be very close, but for now I'll say United has the upper hand for now.
Little Children isn't getting as much raves as I expected, but it's still should be in there. Best Actress powerhouse and some other nods should put it in the race, outside chance of stealing a nom.
The Good German... I haven't heard enough about it yet, and I don't trust Soderbergh. Will need to be a critical darling as the bo for it is going to suck, I'm expecting good reviews but not raves.
Running With Scissors is the token comedy choice, and I love the cast, but it needs no less than a Sideways reception. Mayyybeeee. Should definitley be a solid bet for screenplay and some supporting nominations though.
The Good Shepard seems like it'll be too long and boring. I suspect the reaction to it will be similar to Syriana's. Ok reviews, a nod or supporting win even, nothing in the BP race.
The Queen has Helen Mirren, but I don't see the movie itself kicking up steam. A better reviewed Ms. Henderson Presents.
Bobby won't get the reviews, Emilio doesn't have enough in the tank for this type of movie.
Factory Girl is still completley unknown and a wildcard, I see possible buzz for Miller and Pierce, the movie itself though... not likely.

_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:13 pm |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
If Children of Men had that Sept. 29th release date I'd still include it... For now:
Babel
The Departed
Dreamgirls
The Good German
United 93
Replace either The Good German or The Departed with Flags of Our Fathers if it gets over 80-85% on RT and over 60 million at the box office.
|
Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:15 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Here's how I see Flags.
Critics love to humble filmmakers who've had great success in the recent past. Just as much as they love to herald filmmakers who haven't had success in many years.
Simply put, they love to be in control.
If Flags is anything less than one of the best WWII films ever made, they will tear it apart.
That then leads to whether or not Flags is critic proof. It is not.
It's a heavy burden for Eastwood/Haggis/Spielberg to bear. I think they're up to the challenge.
I'm really interested to see how this pans out.
|
Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:43 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
I'm curious as to who's been preaching that Bobby is in trouble? I'm just not seeing it. Sure, I expect the very nature of the film to devide some, but I haven't seen anything alarming at all. Agendas at work, but that's par for the course.
|
Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:04 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Here's how I see Flags.
Critics love to humble filmmakers who've had great success in the recent past. Just as much as they love to herald filmmakers who haven't had success in many years.
Simply put, they love to be in control.
If Flags is anything less than one of the best WWII films ever made, they will tear it apart.
That then leads to whether or not Flags is critic proof. It is not.
It's a heavy burden for Eastwood/Haggis/Spielberg to bear. I think they're up to the challenge.
I'm really interested to see how this pans out.
Out of question, was Spielberg really THAT involved with this one?
|
Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:02 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|