Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 7:51 pm



Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
 Bowling for Columbine 

What grade would you give this film?
A 33%  33%  [ 5 ]
B 53%  53%  [ 8 ]
C 7%  7%  [ 1 ]
D 7%  7%  [ 1 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 15

 Bowling for Columbine 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Bowling for Columbine
Bowling for Columbine

Image

Quote:
Bowling for Columbine is a 2002 documentary film written, directed, produced, and narrated by Michael Moore. The film explores what Michael Moore suggests are the causes for the Columbine High School massacre and other acts of violence with guns. Moore focuses on the background and environment in which the massacre took place and some common public opinions and assumptions about related issues. The film looks into the nature of violence in the United States.

The film brought Moore international attention as a rising filmmaker and won numerous awards, including the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature, the Independent Spirit Award for Best Documentary Feature, a special 55th Anniversary Prize at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival and the César Award for Best Foreign Film.


Excellent documentary. Didn't love it as much as Fahrenheit 9/11, but it was great stuff.

B+


Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:38 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 19419
Location: San Diego
Post 
Excellent. I haven't seen many documentaries but this is by far my favorite.

A


Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:49 am
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40537
Post 
A-/B+

Better than Fahrenheit 9/11. Very funny.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:52 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
I liked it until I found out how much of it was incorrect. The opening in the Michigan bank was staged. Some of the NRA footage was not in the time period Moore said. My initial grade would have been a B+, but now it's a C.


Sun Sep 04, 2005 4:09 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
B


Very much incorrect at times and Michael Moore once again comes off as someone who really has little idea of the subject he is "documenting", but at the same time the movie manages to be very entertaining and it made me laugh more often than I would have imagined. I guess the loss of facts is the price for entertainment instead of dry documenting.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:48 am
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Very entertaining, often funny, and sometimes very moving, but never very good at documenting the facts. As a movie, it's very well told, but as a documentary, it leaves something to be desired. Still, it's an excellent film.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:20 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post 
Bowling for Columbine - Moore's 3rd Best Movie!


Bowling for Columbine gave me lots to think about and it's premise (Fear Sells!) is presented in a very entertaining manner, however I would have to say it is Michael Moore's overall weakest movie (my favourite is The Big One). I think it's key weakness is pacing and it would have been a much better film with perhaps 30 minutes cut out of it's 2 hour running time. Nonetheless, it is a must see in the theatre because you know this sort of material is not going to be seen on TV any time soon.

3 out of 5.

(Note: Review written before Fahrenheit 9/11, which I would also rate higher than Bowling for Columbine, but not to say it's not worth seeing. I'm looking forward to Sicko, too - once he finally gets it done...)


Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:02 am
Profile
life begins now
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post 
Very good and better than Fahrenheit 9/11. Very funny.

A-


Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:36 pm
Profile YIM
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
Not as funny, but probably pound-for-pound the better film than Fahrenheit 9/11. Roger & Me is still my favorite Moore picture.

_________________
k


Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:18 pm
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
It doesn't really have much of a focus or a purpose and meanders a bit. Interesting but misleading (the NRA footage did not take place right after Columbine and was taken from various times, the bank thing was staged, and one of the kids who did the bullet "protest" actually feels he was misrepresented). Moore doesn't seem to want to make much of a point but wants to vilify many and use the "culture of fear" which he promotes in the film to sell his own movie.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:34 pm
Profile WWW
Some days I'm a super bitch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
Post 
Interesting.

I liked it. Although I felt the interview with Charelton Heston to be very unprofessional, and quite frankly, unethical, on Moore's part.

B


Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:31 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
A very good film as far as filmmaking and storytelling go but Moore is not a good documentor in any way. He misrepresents, skews, slanders, edits falsely and completely changes what people say.

Not that I don't agree with some of his points/thoughts in the film, but this really isn't a documentary, its more of an op-ed piece.

Anyway, an interesting film to watch. But that is about it. B+

_________________
See above.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:52 pm
Profile
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5823
Post 
D-, Michael Moore's worst film. It's a complete failure as an op-ed piece because the basis of its argument consists soley on fabricated manipulation without regard to the truth.


Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:22 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68341
Post Re: Bowling for Columbine
Superb documentary. Not really an eye-opener, more just reaffirms what I already knew, but it's a brilliant and gripping film despite its one-note reporting. But the final part with Charlton Heston is great film-making. A-

Look forward to watching Fahrenheit 911 now I've seen this, to watch more dumb Americans doing dumb shit.


Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:33 pm
Profile WWW
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23357
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Bowling for Columbine
Even though I'm not a fan of Moore's antics in recent years - Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 911 and Sicko are all very good and importantly also entertaining.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Wed Oct 31, 2018 8:07 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 15 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.